Evaluation narratives from Chicago Bar Association for candidates seeking slating from Cook County Democratic Party

Candidates who had not previously been screened by the Chicago Bar Association but who did not submit a questionnaire will have another opportunity to do so should they actually file for judicial office next year.

However, pursuant to §27.4 of the JEC Resolutions and Procedures, candidates who received an unfavorable rating within the past three years retain that "NOT RECOMMENDED" rating without any further hearing. Favorable ratings also retain in force for some time. This is why some of the narratives you will read below, favorable or unfavorable alike, refer to individuals seeking the office of Associate Judge.

APPELLATE COURT CANDIDATES

JOHN H. EHRLICH – HIGHLY QUALIFIED

Judge John H. Ehrlich is “Highly Qualified” for the office of Justice of the Illinois Appellate Court. Judge Ehrlich was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1988. Judge Ehrlich was elected to the Circuit Court in November 2012. Since 2014, he has been assigned to the Law Division, Motion Section. He previously served in the Chancery Division and Traffic Division. Before being elected, Judge Ehrlich was with the City of Chicago’s Corporation Counsel. Judge Ehrlich is highly regarded by his judicial colleagues and attorneys that have appeared before him for his excellent writing skills, work ethic, fine demeanor, and the breadth and depth of his legal knowledge.

CASANDRA LEWIS – NOT RECOMMENDED

Judge Casandra Lewis is “Not Recommended” for the office of Justice of the Illinois Appellate Court. Judge Lewis was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1991 and elected a Circuit Court Judge in 2002. Judge Lewis presides over major jury trials in the Law Division. Significant concerns about Judge Lewis’s punctuality, diligence, and tardiness in issuing rulings resulted in a “Not Recommended” finding.

DOMINIQUE ROSS – QUALIFIED

Judge Dominque Ross is “Qualified” for the office of Justice of the Illinois Appellate Court. Judge Ross was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1995 and has served as a judge since 2008. Since 2009, she has presided over a trial call in the Domestic Relations Division of Cook County managing complicated domestic relations matters. Judge Ross is well regarded for her legal experience, knowledge of the law, excellent demeanor, and temperament.

DEBRA B. WALKER – HIGHLY QUALIFIED

Judge Debra B. Walker is “Highly Qualified” for the office of Justice of the Illinois Appellate Court. Judge Walker was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1987. She worked in private practice on complex litigation matters prior to becoming a Circuit Court Judge in 2008. She is currently assigned to the Domestic Relations Division, where she presides over financially complex cases. Judge Walker has written extensively for legal publications and spoken widely on legal topics. She is well regarded for her knowledge of the law, legal ability, demeanor, work ethic, and integrity.

CIRCUIT COURT CANDIDATES

DAN BALANOFF – NOT RECOMMENDED

Dan Balanoff declined to participate in the Judicial Evaluation Committee (JEC) screening process and, therefore, according to The Chicago Bar Association’s governing resolution for the JEC, his prior finding of NOT RECOMMENDED is carried over and remains in effect.

DEIDRE BAUMANN – NOT RECOMMENDED

Deidre Baumann is “Not Recommended” for the office of Associate Judge. Ms. Baumann was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1992 and handles a variety of appellate and civil court matters. Significant concerns were raised about Ms. Baumann’s professionalism, diligence, and organizational skills in managing client matters. Additional concerns about Ms. Baumann’s knowledge of the law and knowledge and adherence to court rules and procedures resulted in her “Not Recommended” finding.

HOWARD BROOKINS – PROVIDED QUESTIONNAIRE BUT DIDN’T RESPOND TO MULTIPLE REQUESTS TO SCHEDULE HIS HEARING.

TIFFANY BROOKS – DID NOT SUBMIT A QUESTIONNAIRE

JENNIFER CALLAHAN – QUALIFIED

Jennifer Patricia Callahan is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Callahan was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2006 and is currently engaged in private practice concentrating in insurance defense, criminal law, and administrative law matters. Ms. Callahan also serves as an Administrative Law Judge for the Illinois Student Assistance Commission. Prior to entering private practice Ms. Callahan served as an Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney for 11 years. Ms. Callahan has an excellent temperament and demeanor and is well regarded for her knowledge of the law and legal ability.

MARCIA O’BRIEN CONWAY – QUALIFIED

Marcia O’Brien Conway is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Conway was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1984 and served from 1993-2018 as a Cook County Assistant State’s Attorney in the Real Estate Tax Litigation Unit. Ms. Conway has significant trial experience and is well regarded for her diligence and work ethic.

AUDREY VICTORIA COSGROVE – QUALIFIEID

Audrey Victoria Cosgrove is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Cosgrove was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1990 and has served as a Cook County Assistant Public Defender and in private practice. Ms. Cosgrove is currently serving as Deputy Chief Legal Counsel for the Illinois Department of Labor. Ms. Cosgrove is well regarded for her knowledge of the law, diverse practice experience, and fine demeanor.

ROCELL CYRUS – QUALIFIED

Rocell Cyrus is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Cyrus was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1997. Ms. Cyrus worked for the Cook County State’s Attorney, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Illinois Department of Child ren and Family Services and is currently with the Illinois Commerce Commission. Ms. Cyrus is well regarded by judges and lawyers for her knowledge of the law, litigation and trial skills, and fine demeanor.

ARECELI DE LA CRUZ – QUALIFIED

Araceli De La Cruz is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. De La Cruz was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2001 and served as an Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney from 2001-2009. From 2009-2014, Ms. De La Cruz served as Deputy Chief of Staff, Chicago Transit Authority, Chief Safety and Security Officer with Executive oversight for compliance. From 2014-2016, Ms. De La Cruz served as Chief of General Prosecutions for the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. Since 2016, Ms. De La Cruz has served as General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer for Acero Charter Schools. Ms. De La Cruz is hardworking and well regarded for her knowledge of the law, legal ability, trial and managerial skills, and excellent temperament.

DEBJANI DESAI – QUALIFIED

Debjani Desai is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Desai was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2008. She is currently the General Counsel for the Illinois Office of the Controller. Prior to that she was an administrative law judge at the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services. She began her career as an Assistant State’s Attorney, first in the Child Protection and Enforcement Unit and then prosecuting cases in the Financial Crimes and Public Corruption Unit. Ms. Desai is well regarded for her knowledge of the law, diverse legal experience, and excellent demeanor.

THOMAS MORE DONNELLY – QUALIFIED

Judge Thomas More Donnelly is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Judge Donnelly was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1986. He has been an Associate Judge since 2003. Judge Donnelly has served in a number of divisions of the Circuit Court over his judicial career and is currently assigned to Law Division Jury Trials, a role in which he presides over major jury trials. He also teaches as an adjunct instructor at Loyola University’s law school and is involved in other law-related public service activities. Judge Donnelly is very well regarded for his knowledge of the law, legal ability, work ethic, diligence and excellent temperament.

KATHLEEN DUHIG – DID NOT SUBMIT A QUESTIONNAIRE

JOANNE FEHN - QUALIFIED

Joanne Fehn is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Fehn was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1993. She has experience in both the private sector and government. Ms. Fehn is well regarded for her diverse legal background, knowledge of the law, legal experience, work ethic, and exceptional temperament.

JAMES GLEFFE – NOT RECOMMENDED

James Gleffe is “Not Recommended” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Gleffe was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2007 and has worked for public agencies throughout his career. Mr. Gleffe is currently serving as Deputy Chief of Staff and Labor Counsel for the Cook County Clerk’s Office. Mr. Gleffe has very limited trial and litigation experience. At this point in his career, Mr. Gleffe lacks the depth and breadth of practice experience to effectively serve as a Circuit Court Judge.

DAWN GONZALEZ – QUALIFIED

Dawn M. Gonzalez is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Gonzalez was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1994 and has focused her practice on insurance coverage and insurance defense litigation. She is also active in bar associations and community organizations. Ms. Gonzalez is well regarded for her knowledge of the law, legal experience, integrity, diligence, and excellent demeanor.

COLLEEN GORMAN – DID NOT SUBMIT A QUESTIONNAIRE

RUTH GUDINO – QUALIFIED

Judge Ruth I. Gudino is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Judge Gudino was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1995. After short tenures in the Public Guardian’s Office and UAW-GM Legal Services Plan, she joined the Office of the State’s Attorney in 1998. She tried over 300 cases, including more than 50 jury trials, to verdict. She served as Supervisor of the Juvenile Justice Bureau and of Criminal Prosecutions at the Maywood Courthouse. Judge Gudino was appointed to Cook County Circuit Court Judge in October 2021. Judge Gudino is well regarded for her legal knowledge, extensive trial experience, and excellent demeanor and temperament.

MERIDTH HAMMER – NOT RECOMMENDED

Meridth Hammer is “Not Recommended” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Hammer was admitted to practice law in Indiana in 2001. She was a sole practitioner with a focus on probate, trust, estate planning and real estate. Ms. Hammer became licensed to practice law in Illinois in March 2020. She recently served as Associate General Counsel at the Office of Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County. Ms. Hammer’s failure to disclose personal litigation along with concerns about her limited litigation experience resulted in the “Not Recommended” finding.

RUSSELL W. HARTIGAN – HIGHLY QUALIFIED

Russell W. Hartigan is “Highly Qualified” for the office of the Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Hartigan was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1976 and practiced law from 1977-2010 concentrating in civil trial, workers’ compensation, municipal and appellate practice matters. Mr. Hartigan has handled a number of appeals in both the State and Federal Courts and authored many articles in the ISBA Journal. Mr. Hartigan was appointed to the Circuit Court of Cook County in 2010 and served as a judge until 2017. Mr. Hartigan is currently practicing law with a suburban firm. Mr. Hartigan has extensive experience as a lawyer and as a judge and possesses all the requisite qualifications to serve as Circuit Court Judge.

JOHN N. HOURIHANE, JR. – QUALIFIED

John N. Hourihane, Jr. is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Hourihane was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1998 and is currently engaged in private practice concentrating in commercial litigation, app ellate practice, probate and real estate matters. Mr. Hourihane has extensive experience in commercial litigation and appellate practice and has handled a number of complex legal matters. Mr. Hourihane is well regarded for his knowledge of the law, legal experience, fine demeanor and temperament.

NATALIE HOWSE – DID NOT SUBMIT A QUESTIONNAIRE

NICHOLAS KANTAS – QUALIFIED

Nicholas Kantas is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Kantas was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2004. He works in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office as a supervisor in the Juvenile Delinquency Unit. He previously served in the Office’s Abuse and Neglect Division, Preliminary Hearings Unit, Child Support Division, Civil Division, and the Felony Review Unit, where tried numerous jury trials. Mr. Kantas is well regarded by judges whom he has appeared before and opposing counsel for his calm demeanor, knowledge of the law, legal experience, and fine temperament.

DIANA LOPEZ – QUALIFIED

Judge Diana Lopez is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Judge Lopez was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2001. Prior to being appointed an Associate Judge in October 2021, she was in private practice representing clients in domestic relations and adoption cases. She also acted frequently as a Guardian ad Litem representing children. She is well respected for her legal knowledge, experience, work ethic, integrity, and temperament.

JENETIA MARSHALL – QUALIFIED

Jenetia Marshall is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Marshall was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2004. She practiced at the Office of the Public Guardian in Cook County prior to joining the Department of Children and Family Services in 2019 where she currently serves as Statewide Compliance Administrator. Ms. Marshall is highly regarded by colleagues and judges she has appeared before for her work ethic, diligence, and fine demeanor.

STEVEN MC KENZIE – QUALIFIED

Steven McKenzie is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. McKenzie was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1997. Since 2006, he has been a Supervising Assistant Corporation Counsel, primarily dealing with Housing and Building Code issues. Mr. McKenzie is well regarded for his trial experience, legal knowledgeable and commitment to public service.

PETER McNAMARA – QUALIFIED

Peter McNamara is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. McNamara was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2009. He has had an extensive and varied career as a labor and employment lawyer in the public sector and is currently the Chief Attorney for Labor and Employment at the Chicago Transit Authority. He is well respected for his commitment to public service, his work ethic, his diligence, and his excellent temperament.

JAMES MURPHY-AGUILU – QUALIFIED

James Murphy-Aguilu is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Murphy-Aguilu was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2006. He has experience in both civil and cr iminal litigation from his time in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office and in private practice. He is currently the Inspector General for the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County. Mr. Murphy-Aguilu is well-regarded for his legal experience, diligence and calm demeanor.

MELANIE PATRICK NEELY – QUALIFIED

Melanie Neely is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Neely was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1996 and is currently a Supervisor and Senior Counsel in the Employment Litigation Division of the City of Chicago Law Department. Ms. Neely has considerable litigation experience and is well regarded for knowledge of the law, legal experience, and fine demeanor.

THOMAS NOWINSKI – QUALIFIED

Thomas Nowinski is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Nowinski was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2004 and is currently serving as Supervisor of the Litigation Unit of the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office. Mr. Nowinski has substantial court and trial experience and is well regarded for his integrity, knowledge of the law, and legal experience.

KEVIN OCHALLA – QUALIFIED

Kevin Ochalla is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge . Mr. Ochalla was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2001. He has served as a Public Defender for the past 18 years in Cook County. Mr. Ochalla has extensive jury and non-jury trial experience and is well regarded for his knowledge of the law, legal ability, diligence, and fine temperament.

TRACIE PORTER – QUALIFIED

Judge Tracie R. Porter is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Judge Porter was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1994. Prior to her appointment to the bench in October 2021, Judge Porter worked in private practice i n the areas of real estate, probate, and general litigation. She also worked as a law professor teaching courses in legal writing, real estate, estate planning, and business organizations. Judge Porter is well regarded for her knowledge of the law, legal experience, integrity, diligence, and excellent demeanor.

ASHONTA RICE - QUALIFIED

Ashonta C. Rice is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Rice was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2005 and is currently in private practice concentrating in family law, juvenile Law, and social security. Ms. Rice has an excellent temperament and demeanor and possesses the requisite qualifications to serve as a Circuit Court Judge.

LORI ROPER – NOT REOMMENDED

Lori Ann Roper is “Not Recommended” for the office of Associate Judge. Ms. Roper was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1994 and has served as an Assistant Public Defender in the Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender for 26 years. Ms. Roper is currently a supervisor in the Felony Trial Division. Concerns about the candidate’s candor and judgement regarding personal financial challenges resulted in a “Not Recommended” finding.

ELIZABETH RYAN – QUALIFIED

Elizabeth “Beth” Ryan is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Ryan was admitted to practice law in 2004 and is currently a solo practitioner concentrating in personal injury, corporate litigation, and social security disability law. Ms. Ryan is well regarded by her peers and by the judges before whom she has appeared for her knowledge of the law and legal ability.

PAMELA SAINDON – QUALIFIED

Pamela Saindon is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Saindon was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1995. Ms. Saindon spent her first years in practice as a law clerk for an Illinois Appellate Court Judge and then an Illinois Supreme Court Judge. She has since worked for a government agency and currently works for the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District in the User Charge and Enforcement Division. Ms. Saindon is well -regarded for her legal experience, knowledge of the law and fine temperament.

YOLANDA SAYRE – QUALIFIED

Yolanda Sayre is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Sayre was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1995. Since 1997, Ms. Sayre has served as an Attorney for the Education and Training Division for the Chicago Police Department. In that role, Ms. Sayre is responsible for drafting materials for training police personnel on criminal, civil, and juvenile procedure. Ms. Sayre is also a hearing officer for the Cook County Board of Elections and has conducted over 50 hearings for the Board of Elections. Since 1996, Ms. Sayre has also maintained a general practice and has handled a wide variety of legal matters. Ms. Sayre possesses the legal knowledge, experience, and ability to serve as a Circuit Court Judge.

MONICA SOMERVILLE – QUALIFIED

Monica G. Somerville is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Somerville was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1990. She has varied practice experience and service in the public sector. Ms. Somerville is well regarded for her legal knowledge, temperament, and diligence. She has the requisite experience to serve as a Circuit Court Judge.

SANJAY TAILOR – HIGHLY QUALIFIED

Judge Sanjay T. Tailor is “Highly Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Judge Tailor was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1991 and was engaged in private practice prior to his appointment to the bench as an Associate Judge in 2003. Judge Tailor served in the Chancery Division, Municipal Division, Domestic Relations, and Law Division prior to his current position as Acting Presiding Judge of the County Division. Judge Tailor was appointed as a Cook County Circuit Judge in January 2021. Judge Tailor is highly respected by his fellow judges and the lawyers who appear before him in court. Judge Tailor is an experienced jurist highly regarded for his knowledge of the law, integrity, diligence, work ethic, and excellent demeanor and temperament.

LISA TAYLOR – QUALIFIED

Lisa Taylor is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Taylor was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2001. She has over 20 years of experience, primarily in private practice for several law firms working in insurance, tort, and other civil litigation areas. She is well regarded by judges and adversaries for her legal knowledge, temperament, and integrity.

BRADLEY TROWBRIDGE – QUALIFIED

Bradley Trowbridge is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Trowbridge was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2000 and is engaged in private practice concentrating in family law matters. Mr. Trowbridge has a fine demeanor and temperament and possesses the requisite legal knowledge and experience to serve as a Circuit Court Judge.

RENA VAN TINE – HIGHLY QUALIFIED

Judge Rena Van Tine is “Highly Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Judge Van Tine was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1986, became an Associate Judge in 2001 and was appointed a Circuit Court Judge in February 2021. Prior to becoming a judge, she had extensive litigation experience. Judge Van Tine was assigned to the Child Protection Division for 17 years. She currently sits in the Law Division. Judge Van Tine is an experienced jurist well regarded for her work ethic, integrity, and temperament.

TORRICK WARD – QUALIFIED

Torrick Alan Ward is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Ward was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1998. He has significant litigation experience in several substantive legal areas. He presently oversees labor matters for Cook County. He is well regarded for his legal knowledge, work ethic, temperament, and integrity.

MICHAEL WEAVER – QUALIFIED

Michael Weaver is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Weaver was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2006 and is engaged in private practice at a major Chicago law firm concentrating his practice in civil and commercial litigation. Mr. Weaver handles a variety of complex legal matters and is well regarded for his knowledge of the law, extensive experience, and fine demeanor.

ANTOINETTE WESTON – DID NOT SUBMIT A QUESTIONNAIRE

TIMOTHY WRIGHT, III - QUALIFIED

Timothy Wright III is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Wright was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 1984. Mr. Wright has served in several roles in government and private practice. He has practiced in variety of areas of substantive law. His current practice includes commercial litigation and public finance. Mr. Wright is well-regarded for his legal knowledge and experience, his strong work ethic, and his calm demeanor.

Chicago Bar Association reveals ratings for candidates expected to seek slating next week from the Cook County Democratic Party

Spotted on Facebook today.

This is something I've lobbied for for years now.

I only wish I had something to do with this.

*Sigh*

Anyway, the Chicago Bar Association has released ratings for those judicial candidates expected to present credentials next week at the Cook County Democratic Party's slating meeting. Here is the list (click to enlarge or clarify):

The Chicago Bar Association has released narratives for these candidates. These will be addressed in the next post.

39th Ward Democratic Organization makes recommendations for next week's slating meeting

From an email yesterday signed by State Sen. Ram Villivalam, the 39th Ward Democratic Party Committeeman:

After our thorough Questionnaire and Interview process, the 39th Ward Democratic Organization will recommend the following candidates for slating at the Cook County Democratic Party next week. The 39th Ward Democratic Organization is recommending Federal, Statewide, Countywide, and Judicial candidates at this time. District-specific positions (State Representative, State Senator, Cook County Commissioner, and so forth) will also go through a formal endorsement process at a later date and time.

A note at the end of the email addresses the recent "loyalty pledge" controversy: "The 39th Ward Democratic Organization will not factor whether or not a countywide candidate has signed the endorsed candidate pledge into its decision making process at slating."

In the list that follows, the abbreviation CDS means "Committeeman Discretion at Slating."

Herewith, then, the 39th Ward Democratic Organization's list of preferred candidates:

Federal:
Senator Tammy Duckworth (IL)
Congressman Mike Quigley (IL-5)

Statewide: Governor- JB Pritzker
Lt. Governor- Juliana Stratton
Attorney General- Kwame Raoul
Secretary of State- Alexi Giannoulias
Treasurer- Michael Frerichs
Comptroller Susana Mendoza

Countywide:
Cook County President- Toni Preckwinkle
Cook County Clerk- Karen Yarbrough
Cook County Treasurer- Maria Pappas
Cook County Sheriff- CDS
Cook County Assessor- CDS
Cook County Board of Review (District 2)- Michael Cabonargi

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District:
1. Mariyana Spyropoulos
2. Patricia Theresa Flynn
3. Yumeka Brown
4. Daniel Pogorzelski

Appellate Judge: CDS

Circuit Court Judges:
Rena Marie Van Tine
Araceli De La Cruz
Beth Ryan
Jennifer Callahan
Ruth Gudino
Pam Saindon
Yolanda Sayre
Diana López
Thomas Nowinski
Michael Weaver
Steven Q. McKenzie
Jim Gleffe
John Hourihane
Debjani Desai
Howard Brookins, Jr.
Thomas Donnelly
Ashonta Rice
Lisa Taylor

9th Subcircuit Judge: Sanjay Tailor

There are 18 names on that Circuit Court list. I know of eight countywide vacancies at this point. I may be off by one or two (and would be neither suprised nor embarrassed if I am) but I'm not off by 10.

Five ward committeemen write letter protesting loyalty pledge to Chairman Preckwinkle

FWIW received this copy of this letter, dated December 9, and addressed to Cook County Democratic Party Chairman Toni Preckwinkle and Party Executive Director Jacob Kaplan. The letter is signed by 33rd Ward Committeeperson Iris Y. Martinez, 49th Ward Committeeperson Kelly Cassidy, 26th Ward Committeeperson Angee Gonzalez, 30th Ward Committeeperson Ariel Reboyras, and Raymond Lopez 15th Ward Committeeperson. I have reason to believe that this letter is genuine.

I don't know how many committeepeople object to the loyalty pledge, but this letter certainly suggests that the loyalty pledge has not exactly brought about the enhanced party unity that was intended. At least not so far.

Herewith, the letter in its entirety:

Dear Chairman Preckwincle & Executive Director Kaplan:

We, the duly elected committeepersons indicated below, object to the recent action taken by the Cook County Democratic Party’s Executive Committee.

To wit:

This past Monday, December 6, 2021, the Cook County Democratic Party sent an email to candidates wishing to file nominating papers to run in the Democratic primary election to be held on June 28 of 2022.

First and foremost it should be noted that the document titled “Potential Candidate Agreement, Promise and Pledge (herein after simply referred to as “pledge”) was conceived without the party engaging in due process or transparency in that, except for those members of the party’s executive committee, none of the other 80 Ward and Township Committeepersons were made aware that these meetings and/or deliberations were being held and that they were for the sole purpose of stifling open discourse and competition in the electoral process.

Further, it is ironic that in paragraph 1, sub-section “c”, the party talks about a “coordinated and unified effort including all 80 wards and townships and promulgating a cohesive slate of candidates rich in the diversity within Cook County without regard to race color creed, etc.” And yet, it is interesting to note that based on information and belief, this so-called pledge is designed to do completely the opposite. If, for example, women of color choose not to sign this pledge and submit it to the party bosses no later than 10:00 AM on Friday, it is implied that they will not be able to present their credentials to the Committeepersons for possible slating by the party for the offices they are seeking.

It is one thing for a slated candidate to sign the pledge once he or she has secured the party’s endorsement. It is quite another to not even be able to present their credentials because they did not sign the pledge in advance. This will have a chilling effect on those candidates that do not want to be bound by party rules in the event they are not chosen for slating. Our party does not stand for the stifling of competition. It stands for quite the opposite. An open and fair process to give every candidate the chance to be supported by the party.

Most troubling are the restrictions placed upon them pursuant to paragraph 3, sub-sections (a) and (b) as indicated in the pledge. Without a doubt this will place severe restrictions on their rights to freedom of association and assembly which is guaranteed to them under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. In fact, this kind of speech (political speech) is at the very top of the different types of speech protected under the First Amendment because it is the fundamental to the principles of a Democratic Republic.

Those restrictions in and of themselves are very disturbing to us as Democratic Ward Committeepersons. Our party has always stood as a fierce defender of our first amendment rights and to restrict an individuals rights to associate themselves with any other candidate or campaign is abhorrent to our very sense of democracy.

Therefore, we respectfully ask that the party reverse the decision made by the party’s executive committee and that this unjust and unconstitutional edict be declared null and void.

Sincerely,

Iris Y. Martinez
33rd Ward Committeeperson

Kelly Cassidy
49th Ward Committeeperson

Angee Gonzalez
26th Ward Committeeperson

Ariel Reboyras
30th Ward Committeeperson

Raymond Lopez
15th Ward Committeeperson

The problem of the faithless alternates?

After posting yesterday's story on the Cook County Democratic Party's demand for a loyalty pledge from all prospective countywide candidates, I heard from a Cook County Democratic Party committeeperson who suggested that a motivation for this new demand was that three persons who were slated as alternates for the 2020 election cycle ran against the Party -- and that at least one of these participated in "detailed and sensitive strategy sessions with other members of the slate" (as might be expected of an alternate) before making a run.

I can't speak to whether someone sat in on 'strategy sessions' before making a run, but I can look at my archives and see which slated alternates did or did not run against the Party.

For the 2020 primary, the Cook County Democratic Party selected 10 alternates for potential countywide vacancies.

That's a huge number. In a typical election cycle one or two late vacancies may occur -- and there were none in 2020 -- but never, ever 10.

In theory, being selected as an alternate is good because if a vacancy does occur, the next alternate in line is, if you will, pre-slated. Where there is a realistic chance at winding up being an actual, slated candidate, it may make abundant sense to wait. The first in line would have a good chance of getting on the ballot. Case in point: Vacancies opened up for the first three of the eight alternates selected in the 2018 election cycle and all three ultimately won (two were unopposed).

But being the 10th alternate? That may be the political equivalent of a participation trophy.

With that background in mind, let's take a look at the 10 alternates selected for the 2020 election cycle and what happened to them since:

1. Thomas Nowinski. Did not run against the Party. The fifth alternate in 2018, Nowinski jumped to the head of the line in 2020 because the 2018 alternate ahead of him -- an appointed judge who had to seek election to stay on the bench -- chose to run in a subcircuit. Nowinski appeared for the Party's pre-slating meeting.


2. Travis Richardson. Did not run against the Party. A former appointed judge, Richardson did not appear for the Party's pre-slating meeting.


3. Cristin McDonald Duffy. Ran against the Party for a countywide vacancy. She didn't win, but neither did the slated candidate.


4. Eric Sauceda. Did not run against the Party. Selected as an associate judge this past September.


5. Yolanda Sayre. Did not run against the Party. She did do a little fundraising to give her a leg up on 2022. And she did appear for pre-slating.


6. Frank Andreou. Did not run against the Party. Selected as an associate judge in December 2019.


7. Joseph Chico. Ran against the party for a countywide vacancy. And lost. The Party's slated candidate won.


8. Diane Marie Pezanoski. Did not run against the Party. Selected an associate judge in December 2019.


9. Amanda Pillsbury. Ran against the Party for a countywide vacancy. And lost. To the Party's slated candidate.


10. Ashonta Rice. Did not run against the Party. Did appear for pre-slating in October.

So as my committeeperson source reported, three of the 10 alternates from 2020 did run against the Party. But all three lost.

Which doesn't say much for the value of those "detailed and sensitive strategy sessions with other members of the slate."

And the Party won two of the three races in which an alternate made a challenge -- a .667 batting average -- which was exactly how the Party fared as a whole in all contested countywide judicial races in 2020.

No harm, no foul?

Of the 10 alternates, three have likely forfeited consideration from the slatemakers, at least for the immediate future, on account of their failed 2020 bids for the bench. One may not be running this time. Three more have since become associate judges and may be considered 'off the market.'

That leaves three or possibly four (attendance at the Pre-Slating meeting is not required in order for someone to seek slating) looking to have their loyalty rewarded by receiving a spot next week.

But how many spots are actually open?

Therein lies the pitfall of patience. While the alternates are biding their time, new candidates continue to emerge. The Supreme Court fills many countywide vacancies before slating (at this point, I know of two unfilled countywide vacancies) and the Court's appointees (though not automatically slated) often wind up slated.

There may be more vacancies than I know about. There often are. But can there ever be enough?

And, if there aren't, what is the value of "loyalty" here?

But let's step back a bit: If the problem motivating the loyalty pledge is faithless alternates, why is only one subparagraph (¶3(c)) of the two-page document) devoted to this alleged problem? A "problem" which involves alternates running and losing.

With all due respect to my committeeman source -- who has, of course, asked not to be named -- there must be something more behind this written loyalty pledge than alternates who refuse to stay sidelined.

In his Sun-Times column yesterday, Mark Brown says he was told "the loyalty pledge requirement was enacted because of frustration by party leaders with the large number of judicial candidates especially who seek the party’s backing and then run without it, often successfully."

But nothing in the pledge prohibits a candidate neither endorsed nor named as an alternate from running against the Party. Nor could it.

Brown also quotes candidates and consultants who denouce the pledge as 'bullying' and something "out of the Communist Party playbook."

Brief aside here: Brown actually gets to quote people. By actual name. By contrast, almost anyone who communicates with me starts out with "this is off the record" or "keep my name out of this" or "you didn't hear this from me." Of course, none of the people Brown actually quotes are lawyers. Even if they are involved with judicial campaigns.

There is still the question of whether the pledge potentially puts a judicial candidate on the wrong side of the Code of Judicial Conduct. As I reported yesterday, the Party insists that it does not. Others say differently. But I am still endeavoring to find someone who will speak for the record.

Stay tuned.

Cook County Democratic Party demands written "Agreement, Promise and Pledge" from prospective candidates

The Cook County Democratic Party will hold its slating meeting next week.

At past slating meetings the Cook County Democratic Party has always asked prospective candidates if they will be willing to pay some sort of assessment for common campaign costs ($40,000 or thereabouts), whether they will support the entire ticket if slated, and whether (if rejected by the Party) they will run against the Party.

There's nothing new or especially controversial in that.

What is new -- this year -- and very controversial, at least in some quarters, is that the Cook County Democratic Party is asking all candidates who appear before the slatemakers next week to sign and return a two-page document entitled "Potential Candidate Agreement, Promise and Pledge" by Friday, December 10. The document is set out in full in this post on Page Two. Feel free to read it and come back.

To begin with, the Party says this pledge is not intended as a loyalty oath or litmus test, according to communications FWIW has had with the Party's executive director and its counsel. But some committeemen and political consultants disagree. One committeeperson told FWIW, "If history has taught us anything we should recognize the danger in making people sign oaths or pledges."

A number of committeepersons have charged that the decision to draft and send this pledge document was taken by the Party's Executive Committee without consultation of the "rank and file" committeepersons.

As far as FWIW can ascertain, this allegation is well-founded. But, Party sources insist, the pledge agreement is a natural outgrowth of discussions within the Executive Committee over the course of several years. Issues of internal support and discipline have been of increasing concern for the Party; my sources see this new pledge as a natural consequence of an incremental standardization and formalization process.

Refusal to sign the pledge is not an automatic bar to slating. Candidates who have failed or refused to sign the pledge may still be slated, according to the Party, if they win sufficient numbers of the weighted votes of the 50 ward and 30 township committeemen that ultimately choose the slate. The Party executive director and counsel characterize the pledge as just another data point included in the binders of information given to each committeeman concerning each candidate, along with information regarding the candidate's credentials, financial backing, and so forth.

As with everything political, therefore, it comes down to votes: If enough committeepeople are offended by the demand for a pledge, candidates who refuse to sign may actually have an advantage. We may be able to determine whether there is serious discontent about the pledge request, or how widespread that discontent may be, next week, when the slate is revealed.

But probabaly not.

The 80 committeepeople in the Cook County Democratic Party Central Committee are drawn from diverse backgrounds with widely varying experiences. In other words, most days they probably would disagree on the color of the sky. They may claim unanimity next week -- they will claim unanimity publicly -- but, if history is any guide, some committeemen will be as loyal to the entire slate as Brian Kelly was to Notre Dame. And we won't necessarily know about all of those who break ranks (or for whom) until the votes are counted next summer. And, by then, it won't really matter.

I've said before that the purpose of slating is for the Party to identify and support likely winners. The paramount objective of a political party is to win elections. That is likewise the paramount objective of any political candidate. And, to win, any candidate needs to build a successful, if temporary, coalition of support. Party loyalists are but one component.

I asked whether, pursuant to this new pledge, a slated candidate would jeopardize his or her standing by attending an event where candidates running against the slate are featured. The Chicago Federation of Labor will no doubt endorse most of the same candidates as the Cook County Democratic Party. But probably not all of them. Would, for example, a slated countywide judicial candidate risk forfeiture of her Party support by appearing at a labor event along with non-slated candidates?

Party sources told me that this is not the intent of the pledge. The purpose is not to prevent a candidate from using a consultant or election attorney or pollster who may be working against the ticket in a different race -- my sources said the Party recognizes that there is a limited pool of qualified political professionals from which to choose -- but, rather to prevent the chosen candidates from actively working against a slated candidate in another race.

Events will show.

However, even if the intention is benign, there is a real question of whether this pledge will have a chilling effect on some candidates.

I know of candidates, in past elections, who were afraid to appear at events with non-slated candidates, even if they were permitted to speak glowingly at these events about all their brothers and sisters on the slate, for fear of losing Party Support. That was long before any written pledge. And, you know what? These candidates lost. The successful candidate has to go anywhere and everywhere where support may be found, and seek support for him- or herself from both those who are inclined to support others on the slate as well as those who are not so inclined.

Then, for judicial candidates in particular, there is the question of whether this explicit, detailed pledge contravenes the Code of Judicial Ethics. Does the pledge potentially compromise judicial independence (Canon 1)? Does it potentially constitute a comment on matters that may come before the judge in the course of his or her duties (Canon 3A(7))? Do the requirements to supervise and monitor and control the activities of subordinates or volunteers, particularly in the expenditure of funds, potentially put a candidate on the wrong side of Canon 7?

Party sources claim that the pledge does not put a judicial candidate on the wrong side of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The pledge requires the candidate to conduct what amounts to a political conflicts check, not allowing him or her to embrace candidates who are in conflict with the slate. Appearing beside a candidate running against the slate at a given event may not constitute active support of the non-slated candidate -- but sending joint mailers would.

(This is a developing story and may be updated as new information is received.)

Illinois LAP announces officers for its Board of Directors

The Illinois Lawyers' Assistance Program has announced Board of Directors Officer positions for the 2021-22 year.

Edward McCarthy will serve as President of LAP's Board of Directors.

McCarthy is the managing partner of McCarthy and Allen in Downstate Glen Carbon. A former President of the Edwardsville-Glen Carbon Chamber of Commerce, McCarthy has also served on the Edwardsville Police Pension Fund Board of Trustees, and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Springfield School Board. He served in the United States Marine Corps from 1967-70, rising to the rank of Captain. Licensed to practice law in Illinois since 1973, according to ARDC, McCarthy also became a Certified Public Accountant in Illinois in 1974.

Cook County Associate Judge Stanley Hill has been named Vice President of the LAP Board.

The Illinois Supreme Court appointed Hill to the Circuit Court bench in 2010. Although he did not succeed in his 2012 run to hold the seat to which he was appointed, his colleagues retained him in the 2012 associate judge selection process.

An ordained Christian minister, Hill is a former president of the Board of Directors of Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc. Before joining the judiciary, Hill practiced in state and federal courts throughout the United States, and operated his own firm, Stanley L. Hill & Associates, P.C. He has been licensed to practice law in Illinois since 1974, according to ARDC.

A complete list of all LAP's Officers and Directors can be found at this page of the LAP website.

LAP’s mission is to help, protect, and educate the legal community about addiction, mental health and wellness. If you or someone you know needs support with mental health or wellbeing, contact LAP at gethelp@illinoislap.org or call (312) 726-6607. LAP's services are 100% confidential with immunity.

Where to recycle broken holiday lights

It happens nearly every year: The lights are brought up from the basement, or in from the garage, or down from the attic. No matter how carefully they were stored, they emerge a tangled mess. And when they are finally untangled... and plugged in just to check... one or more of the strings turns out to be kaput.

If the Elf on the Shelf heard what you said when that happened (or, rather, didn't happen), you'd wind up on Santa's naughty list for sure.

But, other than cursing them, what can you do with the no-longer-functioning strings of lights?

Charlie Meyerson's December 2 Chicago Public Square carried a link to this WTTW post touting efforts by a group of North Side alderpersons and community organizations to recycle non-working holiday lights.

As the linked WTTW article notes, Christmas lights are not permitted in regular recycling bins.

Here is the list, lifted from the WTTW site, where those dead holiday lights will be accepted for recycling:

• 40th Ward office, 5620 N. Western Ave.
• 47th Ward office, 4243 N. Lincoln Ave.
• 48th Ward office, 5533 N. Broadway
• Northcenter Chamber of Commerce, 4054 N. Lincoln Ave.
• A Pretty Flower, 2334 W. Lawrence Ave.
• Erwin Law, 4043 N. Ravenswood Ave., Suite 208

Used extension cords will also be accepted at these locations.

Well, that didn't take long: De La Cruz and Donnelly appointed to countywide vacancies

In separate orders entered yesterday, the Illinois Supreme Court appointed Araceli R. De La Cruz to the countywide vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Joan Margaret O'Brien and also appointed Cook County Associate Judge Thomas M. Donnelly to the countywide vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Sharon Sullivan.

The De La Cruz appointment is effective January 6. Donnelly's appointment is effective December 8. Both appointments expire on December 5, 2022, when the persons elected to these vacancies in the 2022 election will be sworn in.

Both appointments were made by the Supreme Court on the recommendation of Justice Mary Jane Theis. According to the press release issued by the Supreme Court yesterday, Justice Theis recommended these appointments following a review of applicants by a 14-person screening committee consisting of judges, lawyers, and Cook County community members. The Hon. Wayne Andersen (Ret.) and the Hon. Patricia Holmes (Ret.) served as Co-Chairs for the screening committee. The additional members were James Botana, the Hon. David Coar (Ret.), Mary Dempsey, Leynee Cruz Flores, John Gallo, Denise Kane, Beth Kaveny, Mike Monico, Michael Rothstein, Sister Cathy Ryan, Richard Waris, and Mark Wojcik.

Justice Theis's newly reconstituted screening committee was announced by the Court on Thursday. (Click here for FWIW's coverage of that announcement.)

"I am greatly honored and humbled by this opportunity to serve," De La Cruz said, according to yesterday's statement from the Supreme Court. "It is an incredible privilege to do so on behalf of the people of Cook County and I am profoundly grateful to Justice Theis and the Illinois Supreme Court for their confidence in me."

According to the Supreme Court's press release, De La Cruz has over 20 years of experience in law in a variety of important roles. She most recently has spent 5 years as General Counsel/Chief Administrative Officer at Acero Schools of Chicago. Before joining Acero, she served for two years as the Chief of General Prosecutions for the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation’s Division of Professional Regulation.

De La Cruz was slated by the Cook County Democratic Party for a countywide vacancy in 2020, but fell short of the Democratic nomination in a three person race. She was one of the 39 Circuit Court hopefuls who presented credentials at the Democratic Party's pre-slating meeting this past October.

From 2009 to 2014, according to the Supreme Court's press release, De La Cruz served in three different roles for the Chicago Transit Authority, first as Chief of Safety and Security Compliance, then as Deputy Chief of Staff, and finally as Chief Safety and Security Officer, Senior Vice President, where she managed a department of over 45 safety, security and compliance professionals who were charged with the oversight of bus and rail transit system safety. And from 2001 to 2009 she served as an Assistant State’s Attorney in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, prosecuting hundreds of criminal matters via case review, indictment, motion practice, jury trials, bench trials and settlement conferences.

De La Cruz earned her Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and her Juris Doctor from the John Marshall Law School, where she was a recipient of the Elmer Kissane Award. Her professional associations include the Chicago Bar Association, the Hispanic Lawyer’s Association of Illinois, the Puerto Rican Bar Association, and the Woman’s Bar Association.

In the Supreme Court's press release announcing his appointment, Judge Thomas M. Donnelly is quoted as saying, "I am honored that the Illinois Supreme Court has appointed me to serve the citizens of Cook County as a Circuit Judge. As always, I will perform my duties to the best of my abilities and attempt to live up to this honor. This appointment by the Illinois Supreme Court affirms my work and dedication as an Associate Judge for the past 19 years and I appreciate the Court’s confidence in my judicial service."

According to the Supreme Court's announcement, Donnelly has served as an Associate Judge of Cook County since 2000 and is currently assigned to the Law Division where he hears civil jury trials. He has tried over 300 jury trials and over 1,000 bench trials in his time on the bench. Prior to joining the bench, Donnelly clerked for Justice Mary Ann G. McMorrow and served as an assistant public defender for 13 years.

Donnelly served on the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Pretrial Practices from its inception until its final report and was an appointed judicial representative on the Statutory Court Fee Task Force. He currently sits on the Illinois Judicial College Board of Trustees with a term expiring in 2023 and serves as liaison to the Committee on Judicial Education. From 2016 to 2019, he served as the inaugural chair of the Illinois Judicial College Board, and currently serves on the Illinois Judicial Ethics Committee. He has chaired both the Chicago Bar Association Professional Responsibility Committee and the Illinois State Bar Association Standing Committee on Professional Conduct.

Donnelly also appeared before the Cook County Democratic Party's October pre-slating meeting. Rumors about his probabe appointment, now verified by events, have circulated since that time. Those rumors were mentioned, but only obliquely, on FWIW.

Donnelly earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from St. John’s College and his Juris Doctor from the Loyola University School of Law. He has taught at Loyola since 1987 where he currently teaches Illinois Civil Litigation Practice and additionally serves on the faculty of the National Judicial College where he teaches hundreds of judges around the country.

Judge Donnelly’s awards include the Hon. Mary Ann G. McMorrow Distinguished Service Award from the Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity, the Impact Award from the Center for Disability and Elder Law, and the Harold Sullivan Award (named for Judge Sharon Sullivan's father) from the Illinois Judges Association.

Patricia Brown Holmes to Co-Chair revamped Theis Judicial Screening Committee

Retired Cook County Associate Judge Patricia Brown Holmes has been named Co-Chair of a revamped Judicial Screening Committee created by Illinois Supreme Court Justice Mary Jane Theis to screen applicants for possible temporary Cook County judicial appointments. Holmes is currently Managing Partner at Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP (RSHP), where, as her firm bio notes, she is "the first African-American woman to lead and have her name on the door of a major law firm that is not women-or minority-owned."

The Supreme Court also announced today that retired U.S. District Judge Wayne R. Anderson will continue to serve as the other Co-Chair of this committee, as he has since 2013, when Justice Theis first announced the formation of her screening committee.

In addition to Anderson, other returning members of the committee are Hon. David Coar (Ret.), Mary Dempsey, Denise Kane, Beth Kaveny, Mike Monico, Michael Rothstein, Sister Cathy Ryan, Richard Waris, and Mark Wojcik.

Holmes is a new addtion to Justice Theis's screening committee. Also joining the committee, according to today's announcement from the Illinois Supreme Court, are Leynee Cruz Flores, James Botana, and John Gallo.

Leynee Cruz Flores is a partner with the firm of Golan Christie Taglia. Her firm bio notes that Flores is the Immediate Past President of the Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois and serves on the Young Professionals Board for the Center for Disability & Elder Law. Flores is also Treasurer of the Hispanic Lawyers Scholarship Fund of Illinois.

Before joining Golan Christie Taglia, Flores was a principal in the firm of Chuhak & Tecson P.C., where she was leader of that firm's Estate & Trust Administration & Litigation practice group. She is licensed to practice law in both Illinois and Florida.

James Botana is a principal in the Chicago office of Jackson Lewis P.C. His firm bio notes that, before joining Jackson Lewis in 2000, Botana "was a prosecutor and a senior attorney in the Employment Litigation Department of the Office of the Corporation Counsel for the City of Chicago." He was a founding member of the firm's Diversity Committee. The Supreme Court's announcement today notes that Botana was named Latino Lawyer of the Year by the Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois in 2020.

The Court's announcement also notes that Botana still serves as a Special Assistant Corporation Counsel for the City of Chicago. He has also served on the Illinois State Advisory Committee of the U.S. Comission on Civil Rights.

John Gallo is the CEO and Executive Director of Legal Aid Chicago.

Before joining Legal Aid Chicago, in 2017, Gallo was a long-time partner at Sidley Austin LLP. He was Firmwide Co-Chair of Sidley's White Collar Practice from 2010 to 2017 and Head of Litigation in Sidley's Chicago office from 2014 to 2017.

Gallo also served as trial counsel to the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board from 2000 to 2017.

The Supreme Court's announcement today notes that Gallo created Sidley’s Capital Litigation Project in 2005 to provide legal representation to inmates on Alabama’s death row. Before joining Sidley Austin, Gallo spent seven years as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of Illinois.

In today's statement concerning the reconsituted Screening Committee Justice Theis said, "I welcome the new members and thank them for their service," Justice Theis said. "It is important to have a diverse committee to reflect the community we serve."

Justice Theis's Judicial Screening Committee is currently reviewing candidates for vacancies created by the retirements of Judges Joan O'Brien and Sharon Sullivan.

Supreme Court Rules Committee sets February 2 public hearing on proposed new Code of Judicial Conduct

The Illinois Supreme Court Rules Committee will hold a special public hearing (via Zoom) on February 2, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. to hear testimony on a proposal from the Illinois Judicial Ethics Committee (IJEC) for the adoption of a new Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct.

The 54-page proposed new Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct, Proposal 21-08, is based on the American Bar Association’s 2007 Model Code of Judicial Conduct and seeks to advance the IJEC’s mission of promoting the highest standards of ethical conduct by judges in Illinois. Thirty-seven states have previously adopted new Codes of Judicial Conduct based on the 2007 Model Code.

Members of the public will be able to view the livestreaming hearing online via the Court’s YouTube page. Additional information will be provided on the Rules Committee Public Hearing page of the Supreme Court’s website.

The Supreme Court Rules Committee is inviting public comments on the proposals. Written comments should be submitted by January 26, 2022, to RulesCommittee@illinoiscourts.gov or via mail addressed to Committee Secretary, Supreme Court Rules Committee, 222 N. LaSalle Street, 13th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All written comments submitted will also be published and accessible on the Supreme Court's website.

To be scheduled to testify at the public hearing, please register by sending an e-mail to the Rules Committee Secretary, as noted above, no later than January 26, 2022.

The IJEC is a joint committee of the Illinois State Bar Association, the Chicago Bar Association, and the Illinois Judges Association, and its chair is Steven F. Pflaum of Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP. Justice Rita B. Garman serves as Supreme Court liaison to the Rules Committee and James A. Hansen of Schmiedeskamp Robertson Neu & Mitchell, LLP, is chair of the committee.

Judge arrested for DUI in Hinsdale, reassigned to judges' jail

Cook County Associate Judge Mohammed M. Ghouse was arrested by Hinsdale Police on November 23. He has been charged with DUI in DuPage County. Yesterday, Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans entered an order assigning Judge Ghouse to restricted, aministrative duties -- colloquially referred to as "judges' jail."

A Hinsdale-Clarendon Hills Patch news story, by David Giuliani, about the arrest and subsequent reassignment is available at this link. Tribune subscribers (of which I am not one) can access this article.

A statement from Judge Evans was issued late yesterday afternoon. Here is that statement in full:

On November 23, 2021, the Hinsdale Police Department filed a “DUI Criminal Complaint” against Associate Judge Mohammed M. Ghouse in the Illinois circuit court for DuPage County, alleging that, on November 23, 2021, Judge Ghouse was driving under the influence of alcohol and was driving too fast for conditions or failed to reduce speed to avoid an accident.

Today, I have issued an order assigning Judge Ghouse to restricted duties in the Office of First Municipal District Presiding Judge E. Kenneth Wright, Jr., where he will perform administrative duties only, subject to further order of the court. The order is effective immediately.

I have also ordered that this matter be referred to the Judicial Inquiry Board.

My decision follows a meeting of the Circuit Court of Cook County Executive Committee, held on Wednesday, December 1, 2021, to discuss the matter.

Up until the date of his arrest, Judge Ghouse had been fulfilling his assignment in the Fifth Municipal District in Bridgeview, Illinois.

The members of the Executive Committee who participated in the meeting held December 1, 2021, were as follows:

• Honorable Timothy C. Evans, Chief Judge
• Honorable Moshe Jacobius, Presiding Judge, Chancery Division
• Honorable Sanjay T. Tailor, Acting Presiding Judge, County Division
• Honorable Erica L. Reddick, Acting Presiding Judge, Criminal Division
• Honorable Grace G. Dickler, Presiding Judge, Domestic Relations Division
• Honorable Raul Vega, Presiding Judge, Domestic Violence Division
• Honorable David Navarro, Acting Presiding Judge, Pretrial Division
• Honorable Daniel B. Malone, Acting Presiding Judge, Probate Division
• Honorable Diann K. Marsalek, Acting Presiding Judge, Traffic Division
• Honorable Robert Balanoff, Acting Presiding Judge, Child Protection Division
• Honorable Michael P. Toomin, Presiding Judge, Juvenile Justice Division
• Honorable Sophia H. Hall, Administrative Presiding Judge, Juvenile Justice and Child Protection Resource Section
• Honorable E. Kenneth Wright, Jr., Presiding Judge, First Municipal District
• Honorable Shelley Sutker-Dermer, Presiding Judge, Second Municipal District
• Honorable Jill C. Marisie, Presiding Judge, Third Municipal District
• Honorable Cheyrl D. Ingram, Presiding Judge, Fourth Municipal District
• Honorable Kerry M. Kennedy, Acting Presiding Judge, Fifth Municipal District
• Honorable Tommy Brewer, Presiding Judge, Sixth Municipal District

The outcome of the Executive Committee's JIB referral will not be made public unless the JIB brings charges before the Illinois Courts Commission. Historically, although (for reasons of confidentiality -- see Article VI, Section 15(c) of the 1970 Illinois Constitution, as amended) there are no statistics that I know of, the vast majority of referrals do not result in public charges. That charges were not pursued by JIB may sometimes be inferred from subsequent events. (Additional information about the work of the JIB can be found at this website.)

Ghouse became an Associate Judge in 2016.

This may also be an opportune moment to remind readers that the Lawyers Assistance Program is available to help "Illinois judges, lawyers, law students, and their families concerned about alcohol use, drug dependency, or stress related issues like anxiety, burnout, [or] depression."

Campaign website launched for Jim Gleffe

A camapign website has been launched in support of Jim Gleffe's campaign for the Cook County Circuit Court bench. That's a link to the site in the preceding sentence; it will be added to the Candidate Sidebar on this site when that is set up.

Licensed in Illinois since 2007, according to ARDC, Gleffe's campaign biography notes that he currently serves as Deputy Chief of Staff and Labor Counsel in the Office of Cook County Clerk Karen Yarbrough.

Before that, Gleffe worked for then-Cook County Recorder of Deeds Karen Yarbrough as chief legal counsel and, later, as the Chief Deputy Recorder and Chief of Staff. Over the course of his legal career, Gleffe has also worked for Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White, serving in the financial securities division of that office (ultimately rising to chief deputy director), and, later, for City of Chicago Clerk Susana Mendoza, serving as a policy analyst.

Gleffe was among those presenting credentials at the Cook County Democratic Party's recent pre-slating meeting. His campaign website states that attorney Michael Kasper is his Campaign Chair, and Kristen Bauer, the president of KBauer Consulting, Inc., is his Campaign Manager. Among those listed as providing consulting for the campaign are 13th Ward Ald. Marty Quinn and Frank Calabrese.

Options for lawyers in a charitable mood on Giving Tuesday

The Illinois Bar Foundation is making a special Giving Tuesday push for money to support its work "ensuring equal access to justice across the state and providing aid to attorneys in need."

Persons donating to IBF via the organization's Facebook page may have their gifts matched by "Meta" (Facebook's new corporate face) until Meta shells out $8 million matching donations to the IBF and who knows how many other charities that have signed up for this program (Mr. Zuckerberg must be skipping lunch today).

The Lawyers' Assistance Program also has a special Giving Tuesday pitch. Here's a link to the LAP donation page. LAP offers this graphic showing exactly how your donations can translate into specific services:

Also, the Diversity Scholarship Foundation Unity Gala and Awards Ceremony is tonight (the virtual reception starts at 5:00 p.m.) Tickets may still be obtained at this link.

Advertisement: Victory Research offers services to judicial candidates

To all Judicial candidates, just because the state delayed the primary for three months, that doesn't mean you should delay your campaign. Consider the three months a gift from God to get better organized. I believe those who wait will face an uphill battle to win the primary. Please call Victory Research (312-388-1782) to talk about how we might help you win June 28th. We have helped put two dozen judges on the bench and we can help you too. Visit https://www.illinoispoliticalblog.com.

Some last minute advice for those dreading the Holiday get together

Dr. Fauci says it's OK for families to gather at someone's home for Thanksgiving. Actually, he said it's OK if all eligible persons are fully vaxxed and boostered (there's a new verb for you) and maybe if there's a window open (well, the oven's on, isn't it, so that's not too much a stretch) and if no one inhales too deeply. Something like that.

But we're Americans -- we're vague on details -- so once Dr. Fauci said OK all hesistation was thrown to the winds and, across this great land of ours, vast hordes of relatives, some of whom have had no contact with one another for 20 months, have begun converging. Vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.

And you, Dear Reader, are panicking: We are told that Thanksgiving dinners are supposed to be like this --

-- but we all know that the actual events can go from awkward to angry in a heartbeat. Especially if dinner is delayed past halftime of the Dallas game. In vino veritas? Well, sometimes, too much vino can unleash some unfortunate pent-up sentiments.

And that was before Covid.

In My Fair Lady Professor Higgins advises Eliza Doolittle (going to her first Ascot races) to stick to two subjects, the weather and everybody's health.

But even that list is too long for 2021. Someone will inquire about another's health... and the subject of masks and vaccinations will invariably surface... and the conversation may veer from awkward to angry to explosive. Frozen turkey in the deep fryer explosive. COVID!

Maybe sports can be substituted as a safe conversation topic.

The Beloved Bears are playing Detroit in a little while. And, in Chicago, at least, there is a common affection, among the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike, for the Beloved. Unless your family has one of those Packer fans. Many do. Some from contrariness. Some because the Bears basically sucked when they were growing up.

The Packers aren't playing today -- it's true -- but someone may mention Aaron Rodgers -- who had COVID! And maybe has Covid toe.

And, all of a sudden, we're back in the deep fryer.

At this moment, you're feeling nostalgic for the days when it was only politics that marred holiday gatherings. Or for the aunt who insisted on tousling your hair and pinching your cheeks when you were over 30.

But it's OK. These awkward holiday dinners are a great opportunity for you and yours to remember that what you share with your family is more important than any of these unimportant things that divide us. And make gatherings awkward sometimes. Have a Happy Thanksgiving.

Just don't talk about COVID!

Cook County budget amendments provide funding for 24/7 Domestic Violence court, pay raises for jurors and private attorneys representing indigent litigants

A press release issued by the Chief Judge's Office yesterday afternoon:

The Circuit Court of County will fund a plan that will more than double pay for jurors, improve and expand services for survivors of domestic violence, and increase pay to private attorneys representing indigent persons, according to Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans.

The new programs will cost the court $2.82 million for 2022, under amendments to the court’s budget passed unanimously by the Cook County Board of Commissioners today. The court will pay for the improvements through delays in filling vacancies of court personnel, reducing the contract budget for the Juvenile Division, and increasing the contribution of fee collections from special-purpose funds.

The amendments provide funding both to address the immediate needs of Domestic Violence Court operations and to establish 24 hour/7 days a week operations for Domestic Violence. Fees for jury service to both petit and grand jurors increase from $14.50 per day to $30 per day, and the related transportation stipend increases from $2.70 per day to $5 per day, effective June 1, 2022. Finally, the rates of compensation for the legal representation of indigent litigants will also increase, effective June 1, 2022.

“These changes are of crucial importance to the administration of justice in Cook County,” said Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans. “While it has required sacrifices from our office, we believe these sacrifices are needed to improve services for those who come before the court, either as jurors, complaining witnesses, or as defendants.”

Judge Evans noted that juror pay has not changed for decades, despite increased costs of transportation, parking, and other goods and services. “We need to respect the time and effort it takes to serve on a jury, which is such a critical part of our justice system under the U.S. Constitution,” Judge Evans said.

In October, Judge Evans formed a committee to review the practices and procedures governing the hearing of domestic violence matters throughout the court, and to review the organization and efficiency of Domestic Violence Division operations at all courthouses where domestic violence matters are heard. The committee, chaired by Domestic Relations Division Presiding Judge Grace G. Dickler, includes judges in the Domestic Relations, Domestic Violence and Child Protection Divisions, advocates for domestic violence victims, and representatives of the private bar, the Cook County Sheriff’s Office, the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, the Cook County Public Defender’s Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, and the Cook County Board.

The funding will pay for additional personnel and equipment, including 40 laptop computers, to boost current operations and allow for 24/7 access to emergency orders of protection for domestic violence survivors.

“The court recognizes that petitioners in Domestic Violence cases are often undergoing tremendous stress and may face physical danger, and that they cannot wait for regular business hours to obtain emergency protective orders,” Judge Evans said. “The establishment of these new procedures, funded in our 2022 budget, is intended to make judges available 24/7 to rule on these critical matters. I would like to thank the board commissioners, advocates and other county officials for working with the court to develop these improvements.”

The additional funding for private attorneys representing indigent clients recognizes the important work done by these attorneys, and brings their pay more in line with pay for similar work in other jurisdictions. Pay is going up from $75 per hour to $112.50 per hour for in-court proceedings and from $50 to $75 for out-of-court preparation, effective for services provided on or after June 1, 2022.

DSF announces award winners for upcoming Unity Gala; tickets now on sale

The Diversity Scholarship Foundation's annual Unity Gala will be online again this year.

The event is set for Tuesday, November 30, starting at 5:00 p.m. Tickets for the event are priced from $150.

The DSF has announced winners of several awards to be conferred at the Unity Gala.

Illinois House Speaker Emmanuel "Chris" Welch will receive the organization's Unity Award. State Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz (17th) will receive the Hon. Laura Liu Access to Justice Award. The following individuals will be recognized as Advocates for Diversity:

• Erica N. Byrd, Senior Attorney, Valentine Austriaco & Bueschel,


• Hon. Megan Goldish, Judge, Circuit Court of Cook County,


• Antonio M. Romanucci, Founding Partner, Romanucci Blandin Law,


• Jennifer L. Rosato-Perea, Dean and Professor of Law, DePaul College of Law,


• Marvet Sweis Drnovsek, Founder, MSD Injury Lawyers, and


• Adam M. Zebelian, Associate, Schiller DuCanto & Fleck.

In addition, the DSF will bestow scholarships on 21 students attending area law schools.

Tickets and sponsorship opportunities are available on this page of the DSF website; more information may be obtained by emailing dsfchicago@gmail.com.

Advocates offer free CLE tonight

The Advocates Society, the Association of Polish-American Attorneys, is holding its November general meeting online this evening -- a virtual cocktail at 6:30, the Advocates regular meeting at 7:00, but, after this business has been concluded, the Advocates are offering a one-hour free CLE program entitled, "Practice Management: How to Take Time Off for the Holidays."

That seems timely.

The presenter will be Melanie Leonard, the founder and CEO of Streamlined Legal.

To sign up for the program, you must send your full name and ARDC nunber to the Advocates' CLE coordinator, Eryk Wachnik at eryk@wachniklaw.com before the program.

I'm a little wary of putting Zoom meeting details out on the Intertubes where anyone might find them and potentially misuse them, but I assume Mr. Wachnik will be able to provide you with the requisite links if you email him soon. I'll update if necessary.

Chief Justice and Illinois Mental Health Task Force to Host Mental Health Summit Report Release Web Event and Issue a Call to Action

That's a long headline, but it's the one used by the Supreme Court press office in this news release issued Monday:

The prevalence of mental illness and co-occurring disorders is greatly impacting our nation, each of our states, and our communities, and has a disproportionate effect on our courts and justice system. As part of that National Initiative, the Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators hosted a Midwest Regional Summit in October 2019 in Deadwood, South Dakota. Supreme Court Chief Justice Anne M. Burke and Illinois State Court Administrator Marcia Meis assembled and led an Illinois delegation at the Summit.

Upon returning to Illinois, the delegation met monthly and formed the Illinois Supreme Court’s Mental Health Task Force and began planning an Illinois Mental Health Summit. The Summit series, Improving the Court and Community Response to Persons with Mental Illness and Co-Occurring Disorders through Compassion and Hope, convened by Illinois Supreme Court Chief Justice Anne M. Burke, was held virtually over six sessions taking place from September-December 2020. As a final product the summit series, through financial support of the State Justice Institute, the National Center for State Courts drafted and issued the attached 2020 Illinois Mental Health Summit Report.

The Illinois Supreme Court and National Center for State Courts are hosting a Report Release Web Event: A Call to Action on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, from 12:15 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. to present an overview of national initiatives, report findings, and Illinois Mental Health Task Force next steps.

Registration info is available at: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_8_47ZvALQLKE0nDMFEC2Ug.

Ultimately, the results of the Regional Mapping Workshops will inform a statewide vision of what a behavioral health continuum of care with multiple diversion pathways should look like in Illinois and lead to development of a plan and pilot projects to improve court and community responses to mental health and co-occurring disorders. After completion of the Resource Mapping Workshops, we hope that each community and region will sustain efforts through ongoing Councils or leveraging efforts through collaboration with established coordinating councils, task forces, and coalitions.

“The release of the Summit Report and the recent hire of a Statewide Behavioral Health Administrator to facilitate the Task Force equips the Supreme Court with a road map and resource to continue leading change at the intersection of behavioral health and justice. My Supreme Court colleagues and I thank everyone involved in the summit series and heeding this call to action” said Hon. Chief Justice Anne M. Burke.

For further information regarding the Illinois Mental Health Task Force, please visit Illinois Mental Health Task Force (illinoiscourts.gov) or contact Scott Block, Statewide Behavioral Health Administrator, Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts at sblock@illinoiscourts.gov.

And how are you celebrating World Kindness Day?

I would have missed this entirely but for a reader who kindly tipped me off that today, November 13, is World Kindness Day.

You know World Kindness Day is a real thing, because it has its own Wikipedia page (linked above) and because CNN has a story about it.

I hope it becomes an even bigger thing because, well, the world (and all of us in it) could use a lot more kindness. However you celebrate, celebrate responsibly.

New countywide vacancy opens with retirement of Judge Margaret A. Brennan

Judge Margaret A. Brennan has retired from the Cook County bench, opening a new countywide vacancy in time for the 2022 primary.

According to this press release, Judge Brennan has joined ADR Systems as a member of its panel of senior mediators and arbitrators.

First elected to the Circuit bench in 2002, Brennan was retained in 2008, 2014, and 2020.

The most recent Who Sits Where post has been updated accordingly.