Friday, March 29, 2024

Cosgrove wins 11th Subcircuit seat; Przekota concedes


Audrey Victoria Cosgrove has won the race for the Democratic nomination for the Daleo vacancy in the 11th Subcircuit. She faces no Republican opponent in November.

Cosgrove's opponent, Kim Przekota, released a family photo and a statement on Facebook earlier today. I reproduce that statement in full here:
Although I was ahead on election night, I am now down 300+ votes with VBM counts nearly finished.

So, today I called my opponent, Audrey Cosgrove, to formally concede and congratulate her on winning the primary election. Thank you SO much to everyone who helped, encouraged, supported and voted for me! I am beyond grateful. Throughout this process I worked hard, learned a lot and met amazing new people. I am disappointed in the final outcome, but I am not discouraged about the future and I will continue to pursue my dream of becoming a judge. In the words of former Iona Coach Jimmy V, “failure and rejection are only the first step to succeeding.”

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

Cosgrove margin grows in 11th Subcircuit race

In the latest numbers pulled from the City and County websites, Audrey Victoria Cosgrove now has a 300-vote margin over Kim Przekota, 13,393 to 13,093.

In the latest tabulations, Przekota has gained only 136 votes, while Cosgrove has picked up 267.

The County website says there are, as of yesterday, 407 uncounted mail-in ballots and only three provisional ballots in question. (Some 37,484 other ballots were mailed out to voters requesting them... but so far not returned.)

As of this morning, the CBOE website says there are "53,712 Vote By Mail ballots sent to voters [which] remain unreturned or unrejected for the March 19th Primary Election." Following the link will allow the interested reader to download an Excel file showing the ward-by-ward and party label breakdown of that figure.

Monday, March 25, 2024

Cosgrove now leads in 11th Subcircuit race

When I first reported on the race for the Daleo vacancy in the 11th Subcircuit (on Tuesday night), Kim Przekota held an uncomfortable 273 vote lead over Audrey Victoria Cosgrove. I said then that the ultimate result in this race was 'not clear.'

Thursday, Przekota's lead shriveled to just 162 votes. On Friday, with more suburban votes counted, but no new City votes yet posted, Przekota's margin was down to 86 votes. By Saturday, she was only four votes ahead.

The latest online numbers, after more City votes were counted Sunday, put Cosgrove in the lead, 13,126 to 12,957 -- only a 169 vote margin, to be sure, but the trend is clear.

Since I last updated this race on Saturday, Cosgrove has picked up 406 votes, Przekota only 233.

Some, if not most, of these newly-added votes come from the batch of roughly 10,000 ballots that were delivered by USPS on the evening of March 18, but somehow overlooked. The link in that sentence should take you to the first in this series of four Tweets (even if we are supposed to call the site 'X', I think we still best describe individual posts thereon as 'Tweets'):
How many of the newly counted 11th Subcircuit votes were included in this overlooked batch? How many other votes are left to be counted? I don't have the answers to these questions. I understand that the County will be counting another thousand votes at some point today, but (and I hope this is obvious) not all of these will be ballots from the suburban precints of the 11th Subcircuit.

I know that many FWIW readers -- the brightest ones, perhaps -- have sworn off X, or Twitter, or whatever you may wish to call it. I have spent far too many unhappy hours this weekend, struggling in the Twitter muck, trying to follow and make sense of the aftermath of the St. Joseph's Day Primary: There is good, accurate news to be had in the swirling flotsam and jetsam on that site, albeit often covered in a paranoid toxic ooze. It's depressing, even soul-crushing. But there are occasional voices of reason that may be heard, faintly, when not drowned out by the screams of outrage, real or feigned, crazed or calculated, often grossly disproportionate to any possible provocation.

So kind of like discovery motion practice.

And on an infinite variety of topics.

But I will continue to endure it as best I can, for as long as I can, because there are almost certainly more updates to come.

The election was a week ago tomorrow.

Saturday, March 23, 2024

Four votes separate 11th Subcircuit candidates? Yikes!

When FWIW first reported on the race for the Daleo vacancy in the 11th Subcircuit (on Tuesday night), Kim Przekota was holding an uncomfortable 273 vote lead over Audrey Victoria Cosgrove. Thursday, the lead had shriveled to just 162 votes.

Friday, with more suburban votes counted, but no new City votes yet posted, the margin was down to 86 votes.

As a commenter to that last linked post pointed out, when City votes were posted Friday evening, Przekota's margin shrank to just four votes (12,724 to 12,720).

More votes are being counted today. FWIW will continue to follow the story.

I am truly sorry for everyone concerned, however it turns out.

Friday, March 22, 2024

Close election in 11th Subcircuit is closer still... can we talk about this for a minute?

When FWIW first reported on the race for the Daleo vacancy in the 11th Subcircuit (on Tuesday night), Kim Przekota was holding an uncomfortable 273 vote lead over Audrey Victoria Cosgrove. Yesterday, the lead had shriveled to just 162 votes.

Today, with more suburban votes counted, but no new City votes yet posted, the margin is down to 86 votes.

Can we talk for a moment?

It's Friday afternoon. The polls closed Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. This is the 21st Century. Can we agree -- just for purposes of this race -- at least to start -- how ridiculous this is? Surely the least sensitive among us should be able to see how brutal this delay must be for the candidates in this race, and how stressful this must be for their families and friends?

Whoever wins this particular race will almost certainly be a fine judge. These are two good candidates, with differing backgrounds, yes, but both highly rated and respected. There's none of that breathless, the-world-will-end-if-our-side-doesn't-win stuff in this race that there seems to be in other, still-undecided races left over from Tuesday's primary... whatever side you are on in those other contests.

None of the bilious rumors and innuendo swirling around on X (née Twitter) about those other races has tainted this race in the slightest as far as I can tell (and, shamefully, I admit that I have spent far too much time online in the aftermath of this election than I should). So it is easier -- at least it should be easier, I hope -- to step back and try and to be objective about the process by just focusing in on this one race.

When I do this, I come to but one conclusion: This process stinks. It is enormously unfair and needlessly stressful in and of itself. Then -- when strong emotions get involved, as they certainly are in more high-profile races -- this over-lengthy process leads inevitably to an erosion of trust and confidence in our system. We create an environment in which conspiracy theorists can more widely spread their poisons.

That is just the opposite of what we should want to do. In this sad and sorry and highly polarized age, we need as much trust and confidence in our institutions as possible.

We can't change things for this election. We have to complete the process set in motion.

But we can resolve to do better in the future.

And one thing we can do is resolve to accept votes by mail only if they have been delivered by the time polls close on Election Day.

I don't propose eliminating vote by mail entirely. I've reached an age where I can all too easily see that I may some day have need of the convenience of vote by mail myself. But, if I choose to vote by mail, I can also choose to get the ballot in before Election Day. That way, on Election Night, when the votes are counted, ALL the votes will be counted. We won't be wondering, several days out, who won in a close race.

We can do better for our good candidates. And for ourselves. And for our precious, and fragile institutions. Hello... Springfield?

Thursday, March 21, 2024

Cliffhanger in the 11th Subcircuit?

When FWIW last reported on the race for the Daleo vacancy in the 11th Subcircuit (Tuesday night), Kim Przekota was holding an uncomfortable 273 vote lead over Audrey Victoria Cosgrove.

More votes have been counted since. And, while the focus of reporting has been on the Cook County State's Attorney's race, that is not the only race in which votes are still being counted.

Thus, as of this morning, Cosgrove has narrowed Przekota's margin to just 162 votes.

For what it's worth, the Cook County Clerk's website shows all 72 precincts in the 11th Subcircuit as having been counted, with Cosgrove on top, 6,106 to 5,945. There may still be some mail-in ballots to be tallied in these precincts, but I don't know how many.

Przekota's lead, as on Tuesday evening, comes from City precincts, where she holds a 6,344 to 6,021 margin. But, while the City elections website shows precinct by precinct results, it does not clearly state that all Election Day and early voting votes attributable to these precincts have been counted.

But it does appear that City VBM totals are not yet showing up. Thus, the reference to the CCSAO race above was not just clickbait or an irrelevant tease. (I actually can tie this up, Your Honor.) The Chicago Board of Elections website contains a statement, posted yesterday, about counting mail-in votes. The link is in the preceding sentence; here is the text:
The Chicago Board of Elections was contacted by poll watchers from the campaigns for the Democratic candidates for Cook County State’s Attorney who requested to review the processing and counting of Vote By Mail ballots received on Election Day and through the counting period through April 2.

To accommodate these requests, the Vote By Mail canvass and counting schedule has been amended. Ongoing processing of Vote By Mail ballots will begin Thursday, March 21. Scanning and counting of Vote By Mail ballots by election judges will begin Friday, March 22. The public can expect to see the first updated unofficial election results from these Vote By Mail totals at ChicagoElections.Gov in the evening of Friday, March 22.

The Board is happy to accommodate these requests and appreciates the public’s patience as Vote By Mail ballot results are updated starting on the evening of Friday, March 22 and moving forward on a rolling basis.

Please see the updated 2024 Canvass Schedule by clicking here.
And, yes, the links in the statement above were included in the CBOE's online statement.

Obviously, most of these mail-in ballots still to be counted will not affect the 11th Subcircuit race. But some will. And, no, we don't know how many relevant votes are left to be counted. We will have to find out together.

Tuesday, March 19, 2024

Subcircuit results: Closest race in the 11th Subcircuit

Audrey Victoria Cosgrove narrowly carried the 11th Subcircuit's suburban precincts; Kim Przekota is ahead in the City count. At this time, Przekota has a 273 vote lead, 11,545 to 11,272. The result here is not clear.

But most subcircuit contested races appear to have been resolved:
  • Lucy Vazquez-Gonzalez handily carried both the City and suburban precincts in the new 3rd Subcircuit.

  • Judge Owens J. Shelby seems to have won his race to hold his 7th Subcircuit seat, carrying significant margins in both City and suburbs.

  • James V. Murphy has prevailed in his contested 10th Subcircuit race, with margins in the City and suburbs both.

  • Griselda Vega Samuel is the clear victor in the City-only 14th subcircuit.

  • Luciano "Lou" Panici, Jr. has a clear plurality in the three-way race in the suburbs-only 15th Subcircuit.

  • In a battle of associate judges, Jeffrey G. Chrones is ahead by 741 votes in the suburban-only 18th Subcircuit.

  • In the 19th Subcircuit race, Bridget Colleen Duignan holds solid margins in both the City and suburban returns and seems assured of victory at this point.

  • Nadine Jean Wichern wound up with twice as many votes as her nearest two competitors in the only 4-person judicial race on the Cook County ballot, in the City-only 20th Subcircuit.
Przekota was slated in her subcircuit race. I can't say with certainty that Lucy Vazquez-Gonzalez, Owens J. Shelby, Griselda Vega Samuel, Luciano "Lou" Panici, Jr., and Bridget Colleen Duignan were in fact slated in their respective subcircuits. But they all enjoyed the lion's share of local political support.

The local committeepersons were split in the 10th Subcircuit race, so Murphy's apparent win there can not be seen as a 'defeat' for the Party (although Party Chair Preckwinkle did expressly endorse Murphy's opponent).

But Chrones appears to have defeated the candidate slated by the Party committeepersons in the 18th Subcircuit. Wichern defeated the candidate who enjoyed the greatest support from elected officials in the 20th Subcircuit.

On balance, it was also a good night for subcircuit candidates enjoying Party support. But, unlike the Party's countywide judicial slate, their success was not unanimous.

A great night to be a slated Cook County judicial candidate

The majority of races were uncontested -- victory laps -- default judgments (that's a better legal term, anyway).

And in those countywide races where the party's judicial candidate faced an opponent, the party's candidate won:
  • Justice Joy Virginia Cunningham keeps her seat on the Illinois Supreme Court by a nearly 3-1 margin, with similar lopsided margins in the City and suburbs alike.

  • Appellate Court Justice Cynthia Y. Cobbs keeps her seat on the Appellate Court, winning by a roughly 70-30 margin in the City, and nearly as large as margin in the suburbs.

  • Slated Appellate Court candidate Celia Louise Gamrath received over 72% of the suburban vote and nearly 71% of the City vote.

  • All four slated candidates for the Circuit Court won their races, too. Pablo deCastro, Neil Cohen, Edward Joseph Underhill, and Debjani 'Deb' Desai compiled comfortable margins over their opponents.
It was a great night to be slated for judicial office countywide.

At this hour, it looks like former Appellate Court Justice Eileen O'Neill Burke will squeak past Clayton Harris III in the race for Cook County State's Attorney. She is running behind Harris in the latest City numbers, but by less than 2,000 votes with 91.25% of the votes counted. On the other hand, she is up by more than 15,000 in the suburbs, with 96% of the votes in.

And the Chicago transfer tax increase proposal is down by roughly 22,000 votes with 91.25% of the votes counted.

But the Devil is in the details... and there are mail-in ballots yet to be counted. So these seeming setbacks to the Party tidal wave may yet be overcome.

And, whether O'Neill prevails or not, it was a tidal wave: The Party's candidate for Clerk of the Circuit Court, Mariyana T. Spyropoulos, easily ousted incumbent Iris Y. Martinez. And Martinez was also defeated in her bid to remain 33rd Ward Committeeperson.

Subcircuit candidates running with the support of local Party leaders also fared well tonight... but not as well as those running countywide. We'll look at the subcircuits next.

Start here for the most complete information about every 2024 Cook County judicial race

Bumped up for greater visibility

This is the interactive, voter-friendly part of FWIW. What follows is a list of every Cook County judicial vacancy on the March primary ballot. Voters may be surprised to note how many are uncontested.

Please note that unless otherwise indicated (with the phrase "November election contest") all of the persons running in uncontested races are as good as elected already (and in recognition of this fact, the Supreme Court has given several of these persons -- those not already serving on the bench by appointment -- a head start on their judicial careers). There are no Republican candidates except in those few subcircuit races where a November election contest is indicated. There are no Republican judicial candidates seeking any countywide vacancies, on any Cook County court. There are no Republican primary contests at all. The following is not a partisan statement; it is merely a statement of fact: In the March 19 primary, in order to have any say in who serves in our local courts, one has to take a Democratic ballot.

Of course, not all races are uncontested. These are the ones voters should be looking for. All the contested races in the list below are live links. When you click on any of these, you'll be taken to a post that will show all the candidates in that race, in ballot order, with all ratings and other information about each candidate that I've been able to assemble. Where a candidate has provided FWIW with a statement "in their own words", a link to that statement will be available from that post as well.

There is a link at the bottom of each of these Organizing the Data posts, so voters can examine each contested race in detail, one candidate at a time, and come right back here.

The linked posts will be updated as new information becomes available, right up until the polls close next Tuesday. This post will be at or near the top of FWIW until then.

And now the list:

Supreme Court - Burke Vacancy

Appellate Court - Connors Vacancy (uncontested)
Appellate Court - Cunningham Vacancy
Appellate Court - Delort Vacancy
Appellate Court - O'Neill Burke Vacancy (uncontested)

Countywide - Flannery, Jr. Vacancy
Countywide - Gaughan Vacancy (uncontested)
Countywide - Haberkorn Vacancy (uncontested)
Countywide - Hubbard Vacancy (uncontested)
Countywide - Maras Vacancy (uncontested)
Countywide - Mitchell Vacancy
Countywide - Murphy Vacancy
Countywide - Propes Vacancy
Countywide - Raines Vacancy (uncontested)
Countywide - Sullivan Vacancy (uncontested)
Countywide - Walker Vacancy (uncontested)

3rd Subcircuit - Brosnahan Vacancy
3rd Subcircuit - Harmening Vacancy (uncontested)

4th Subcircuit - Felice Vacancy (uncontested)
4th Subcircuit - King Vacancy (uncontested)
4th Subcircuit - Maloney Vacancy (uncontensted)

5th Subcircuit - Lewis Vacancy (uncontested)

7th Subcircuit - Solganick Vacancy

8th Subcircuit - Collins-Dole Vacancy (uncontested)

10th Subcircuit - McWilliams Vacancy (uncontested)
10th Subcircuit - Wojkowski Vacancy

11th Subcircuit - Collins Vacancy (uncontested)
11th Subcircuit - Daleao Vacancy

12th Subcircuit - Dickler Vacancy (uncontested)(November election contest)
12th Subcircuit - Quinn Vacancy (uncontested)(November election contest)
12th Subcircuit - Schleifer Vacancy (uncontested)(November election contest)

13th Subcircuit - Betar, III Vacancy (uncontested)
13th Subcircuit - Steffen Vacancy (uncontested)

14th Subcircuit - O'Hara Vacancy
14th Subcircuit - Pierce Vacancy (uncontested)

15th Subcircuit - Demacopoulos Vacancy
15th Subcircuit - Toomin Vacancy (uncontested)

16th Subcircuit - Converted from Flood Vacancy (uncontested)
16th Subcircuit - Converted from Griffin Jr. Vacancy (uncontested)

17th Subcircuit - Converted from Aguilar Vacancy (uncontested)
17th Subcircuit - Converted from Flaherty Vacancy (uncontested)

18th Subcircuit - Converted from Gottainer Edidin Vacancy
18th Subcircuit - Converted from Linn Vacancy (uncontested)(November election contest)

19th Subcircuit - Converted from Senechalle Jr. Vacancy

20th Subcircuit - Converted from Budzinski Vacancy

Primary Election Day thoughts and updates

It's been a weird election cycle.

Maybe this is not the strangest primary since I've been covering Cook County judicial elections here -- surely 2020 still holds that dubious distinction. Remember how frightened we were in March 2020? I was scared, at least. And, as I said in that linked 2020 post, I could not understand why the primary had to go forward in March, when the courts, the NCAA tournament, Major League Baseball, college baseball, restaurants, and even the St. Patrick's Day parades all had to be cancelled.

Of course, then we were told we were shutting down for two weeks, or maybe 30 days. We -- we the people -- never dreamed the shutdown would persist, in various ways, for two years or more.

But if 2024 is not the weirdest election cycle, it is still pretty darn strange. I've seen uncontested judicial primaries before -- Eileen O'Neill Burke, for example, was unopposed in 2016, when she was slated for the Appellate Court by the Cook County Democratic Party -- on the same slate with Kim Foxx -- say... was Foxx a MAGA Republican, too?

But I digress... and I don't mean to... this election cycle is different because there are so many uncontested judicial elections. There's a wholly new subcircuit map in Cook County -- for the first time since the subcircuits were implemented, in 1992 -- which should have created opportunities for ambitious judicial candidates. True, the electoral landscape had been carefully designed in Springfield -- the cartographic skills of the Illinois Democratic Party's mapmakers are legendary -- surely the equal of, if not superior to, the Republican wannabe mapmakers in Wisconsin, North Carolina, or Alabama. Why, our maps never lose a court challenge!

But the new subcircuit maps have not been field-tested before today. And today... with so many uncontested races... probably isn't much of a test.

And even the races that are contested are mostly one-on-ones.

We have only two candidates vying for an Illinois Supreme Court vacancy. In the past, that race alone would have brought out four or five or more candidates. (OK, OK, Anne Burke was uncontested in her bid for the Supreme Court in 2008 -- but that was certainly an unusual -- and, at the time, understandable -- circumstance, right?)

Turnout will be low today, perhaps historically so. Low turnouts may suggest that voters are disenchanted with our political shenanigans. But low numbers of candidates... has the popular malaise spread to the potential candidates themselves?

The Cook County Democratic Party Central Committee does not slate judicial candidates in the subcircuits. It never has. But committeepersons in the various subcircuits could and did meet as slating committees for the subcircuits in past cycles, slating candidates for vacancies as they arose. I must admit that this is the first election cycle in some time where I did not hear about subcircuit slating committees anywhwere, even after the fact. Some very keen observers have suggested that there was no Democratic Party slating at all in the new subcircuits this year.

But I checked with the Cook County Democratic Party and I can confirm, per a party spokesperson, that, per county Party bylaws, all of the subcircuit committees were organized, with the chair automatically being the committeeperson with the highest weighted vote. I can't confirm that all the committees met, or that all committees that did meet agreed on who to slate, but I can confirm that Hock and Bhave were slated in the new 18th Subcircuit, and Gonzalez and Przekota were slated in the 11th. Only Bhave and Przekota face challenges today.

And therein may lie the explanation for why we didn't hear much about subcircuit slating in this cycle: We did not have to. The slated candidates were the only ones to file in a great many races.

While the Cook County Democratic Party as a whole does not endorse subcircuit candidates, FWIW has also confirmed that 10th Subcircuit candidate Liam Kelly was endorsed by Party Chair Toni Preckwinkle. He is apparently the only subcircuit candidate specifically endorsed by President Preckwinkle.

Polls close at 7:00 p.m. FWIW will have results when they are available.

Friday, March 15, 2024

Steve Demitro: In his own words

Steve Demitro is a candidate for the O'Hara vacancy in the 14th Subcircuit. His punch number is 162.
I am one of nine children born to immigrant parents who did not speak English, yet worked hard to raise their large family.

I started my adult life as a high school dropout. After much work and a few breaks, I completed my GED, finished college, graduated from law school and passed the Illinois Bar.

With the experience I obtained during several diverse positions in my life, with my legal knowledge, and my integrity, honesty and commitment to the rule of law, I believe I would be an asset to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

My diverse background has taught me a great deal about people and their need for a fair and impartial justice.

I will treat all persons who appear before me with dignity, courtesy, and professionalism.

I will strive to make a fair and impartial decision in every case.

Steve Demitro
https://demitro4judge.com

OK, so what else you got?

You're a determined, and somewhat skeptical, voter. Fine. You've gone through the Start Here post, and clicked or scrolled through all Organizing the Data posts on all the contested races on your ballot.

You take nothing for granted. You've looked at all the Endorsements posts, too, making sure that I didn't give a candidate credit for any endorsement I couldn't actually verify. (Pro tip: Many candidates have more endorsements than I list here on FWIW -- but I only report endorsements where I can confirm the identity of all Cook County judicial candidates to whom the endorser gave the nod -- you can often find more endorsements for candidates on their respective websites.)

But you want more.

You want to be certain that I'm not holding out on you.

Well, perhaps you will find it helpful to look at VoteForJudges.org... or Charlie Meyerson's Chicago Public Square 2024 Illinois Primary Voter Guide Guide (a guide to voter guides). Both will offer to send you right back here to FWIW (if you're a sci-fi buff, you may be concerned about getting trapped in a temporal loop but, as far as I know, no one has ever reported that happening... not they could report back, of course, if it actually happened...).

VoteForJudges.org and Chicago Public Square will also offer you BallotReady, which will build a ballot for you and provide information about each candidate on the ballot.

Chicago Public Square and BallotReady deal with the entire ballot, not just the judicial races, so you may find that helpful.

Or your search engine may have set you down here despite the fact that you don't vote in Cook County and don't care about judicial elections here. Two things: (1) Be grateful that AI hasn't advanced to that stage yet, so we can still laugh about it, even if it is increasingly nervous laughter and (2) if you are from Illinois, outside of Cook County, you can find Illinois State Bar Association evaluations of judicial candidates seeking election in your county by clicking to this page of the ISBA website and finding your county there.

And, of course, there's always the March 2024 Cook County Judicial Election Guide published by Injustice Watch. We all publish the same bar association ratings, but, just for one example, the Injustice Watch guide often has information about candidate spending and finance that I haven't reported. You may find that helpful.

Readers may also find some stand-alone stories about the current election cycle to be of interest. For example:
Voters really can find a lot of information about Cook County judicial candidates... if they want to look.

Last and final pre-primary 'grids' from the Alliance

Readers who closely examined yesterday's Organizing the Data posts may have noticed a couple of instances where the Alliance ratings recited therein did not tie back to the last incarnation of Alliance grids posted here on FWIW. There was a reason.

I had a new, updated, presumably final set of grids from the Alliance to work from. I didn't have time yesterday to post these -- but I do so herewith.

For persons not familiar with the Alliance grids, here is the ratings key:
The hard one to spot, depending on the device on which you're viewing this, may be the superscript 1 in several boxes. This symbol denotes that the particular group was unable to evaluate the particular candidate, and it's not the candidate's fault.

A complete list of all the Alliance bar groups and links to their respective websites follows at the end of this post.

Click on any image to enlarge or clarify:

The Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening is comprised of the Arab American Bar Association (AABAR), the Asian American Bar Association of the Greater Chicago Area (AABA), the Black Men Lawyers’ Association (BMLA), the Black Women Lawyers’ Association of Greater Chicago (BWLA), the Chicago Council of Lawyers (CCL), the Cook County Bar Association (CCBA), the Decalogue Society of Lawyers (DSL), the Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois (HBA), the Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois (HLAI), the Illinois State Bar Association (ISBA), Chicago’s LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC), the Puerto Rican Bar Association (PRBA), and Women’s Bar Association of Illinois (WBAI), working collaboratively to improve the process of screening judicial candidates in Cook County, Illinois.

In looking at these evaluations, keep this statement from the Alliance in mind: "Judicial candidates are rated by the Alliance members based on detailed information supplied by candidates, a background check by trained lawyers/investigators, and interviews of each candidate. Ratings reflect the Alliance's opinion of whether candidates have the necessary qualifications for judicial service or ascension to a higher office and are not a reflection of the candidates' abilities as lawyers or judges."

Thursday, March 14, 2024

Organizing the Data: 3rd Subcircuit - Adams Brosnahan vacancy

Candidates are listed in the order that they appear on the ballot in the Democratic primary; no Republican filed for this vacancy. This post may be updated before the primary as new information becomes available.

Lucy Vazquez-Gonzalez - #161


Campaign Website
(newly added)

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Lucy Vazquez is “Not Recommended” for the office of Circuit Judge. Ms. Vazquez was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2009. She is currently a solo practitioner concentrating in family law and immigration. At this stage of her career, Ms. Vazquez does not possess sufficient practice experience to effectively serve as a judge. Also, Ms. Vazquez needs to address concerns about her punctuality and tardiness.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Lucesther “Lucy” Vazquez was admitted to practice in 2009. She worked as an associate in a small firm handling family law cases from 2009 to 2017. She became a solo practitioner in 2017 where she handles family law, probate, immigration, and mediation matters. Most of her courtroom work is as a guardian ad litem. She has served as an administrative law judge from 2020 to the present handling non-complex City of Chicago building code violations. She is reported to be knowledgeable in her fields of practice and she is reported to have a good temperament. However, the Council is concerned that there have been reports questioning her punctuality and diligence --noting that she sometimes fails to meet court deadlines and return communications to other lawyers. We are also concerned about her lack of litigation experience in more complex matters. The Council finds her Not Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Ms. Lucester “Lucy” Vazquez-Gonzalez has been licensed since 2009. After working with several law firms in the area of family law; since 2017 she has had her own practice, focusing on family law and immigration. She is an appointed Guardian Ad Litem in Cook, Will and DuPage counties and has been an Administrative Law Judge since 2020 hearing building code violations. She is the Secretary of the Puerto Rican Bar Association, a member of various other bar associations, and has been an adjunct professor at the University of Illinois – Chicago School of Law, formerly known as The John Marshall Law School.

Most, but not all, attorneys contacted during the investigation reported that she has an excellent handle on family law; some disagreed, stating that she did not have a good grasp of the law, and that her cases were not complex legally. There were no concerns over sensitivity to diversity, fairness, or demeanor. She has no jury trial experience and limited bench trials, especially in recent years. ISBA finds Lucy Vazquez-Gonzalez not qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Not Evaluated (through no fault of the candidate)

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Not Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Endorsement
Girl, I Guess
------------------------------------------------------

Martin Douglas Reggi - #162


No 2024 Campaign Website found
(Photo obtained from Riverside-Brookfield Landmark)

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
The CBA's evaluation was still 'pending' when this post was published. This will be updated when a rating issues. - Ed.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Martin Reggi was admitted to practice in 1980. He served from 1980 to 1985 as an Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney. He has been a sole practitioner since 1985 with a litigation practice spanning a variety of civil and criminal matters.

Mr. Reggi is considered to have good legal ability with substantial litigation experience, much of which involving more complex matters. He is praised for his temperament. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Martin Reggi has been licensed since 1980. Except for several years early on as an assistant state’s attorney, he has been a sole practitioner with a general practice focusing on criminal defense, civil litigation, real estate closing, Secretary of State hearings and evictions. He has some jury trial experience, none of it recent, bench trial experience in what appear to be misdemeanors: quasi-criminal hearings appear to be in municipal matters. He is a member of various bar associations but has not been active in those organizations or in any community activities.

While attorneys reported that he is fair, impartial, a realist in his representation of clients, and treats all with respect, concerns were raised during the investigation about the depth and breadth of his current legal experience. ISBA finds Martin Douglas Reggi not qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Not Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

------------------------------------------------------
Back to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2024 Cook County judicial race"

Organizing the Data: 10th Subcircuit - Wojkowski vacancy

Updated 3/19/24 with additional endorsement

Candidates are listed in the order that they appear on the ballot in the Democratic primary; no Republican filed for this vacancy. This post may be updated before the primary as new information becomes available.

Liam Kelly - #162


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Liam Kelly is "Not Recommended" for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Kelly was admitted to the practice law in November 2011. In January 2024, he joined the Office of the State Appellate Defender. Prior to that he was an associate at five different law firms, concentrating in criminal defense in State and Federal courts. He also has some experience with civil litigation, orders of protection and child abuse and neglect. As an associate, he was responsible for trial preparation for more senior attorneys, and most of his solo trial experience by himself was only in misdemeanor cases. Mr. Kelly lacks the depth and breadth of legal experience to effectively serve as a Circuit Court Judge.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Liam Kelly was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 2011. He recently took a position with the Office of the Illinois State Appellate Defender. Previously, he worked as an associate attorney for Robert Louis Rascia in criminal defense where he worked since 2019 (and from 2014-2018). Additionally, he has been an associate attorney for Greenberg and Associates (2018-2019), an associate attorney for Villalobos and Associates (2014), an associate attorney for The Rooth Law Firm (2013-2014), and an associate attorney for the Law Offices of Donald J. Angelini Jr. (2011-2013).

Liam Kelly is considered to have substantial experience in criminal defense matters and is praised for his temperament. He has considerable litigation experience and is praised for his litigation skills. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. Liam Kelly was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2011. After working with several criminal defense firms, including over the past few years with the Law Offices of Robert Rascia, in January 2024 he joined the Office of the State Appellate Defender as an Assistant Appellate Attorney. He has served on the Scholarship Gala Committee for the Diversity Scholarship Foundation, with the mentor program of the Asian American Bar Association, and as president of the 39th Ward Democratic Organization.

Attorneys contacted during the investigation spoke positively of his temperament and sensitivity; most described his legal knowledge as adequate, though concerns were raised over his lack of experience as a lead attorney with jury trials and complex litigation, and some criticized his overall analytical ability and limited practice and experience. ISBA finds Liam Kelly not qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Not Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Not Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Endorsements
Cong. Jan Schakowsky
Cook County Board Pres. Toni Preckwinkle
Personal PAC
------------------------------------------------------

James V. Murphy - #163


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Pursuant to section 31 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, The Executive Committee has voted to issue a “Qualified” rating for your current Judge candidacy.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
James Vincent Murphy III was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 1997. Between 1998 and 2022, he served as an Assistant State’s Attorney for the Cook County State’s Attorney Office. He left the State’s Attorney’s Office in 2022. In that Office, he was most recently the Supervisor of the Preliminary Hearings/Grand Jury/Central Bond Court/Branch 66 Homicide and Sex Unit. Previously, he worked in the Felony Review Unit and in Child Support Enforcement, Juvenile Abuse and Neglect, Juvenile Delinquency, and Preliminary Hearings. From 1997 to 1998 he was a Legislative Aide to the City of Chicago’s Committee on Zoning. He is a member of the Chicago Bar Association.

Mr. Murphy is considered to have good legal ability. He has extensive litigation experience as a prosecutor. He is praised for his temperament. The Council notes that he was reinstated after initially put on administrative leave for his actions in the bond hearing in the Adam Toledo case. This situation must be contrasted against a career in which the candidate has established himself as a well-respected practitioner. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. James V. Murphy II has been licensed since 1997. He was a career prosecutor in the Cook County State’s Attorney office until resigning in 2022 to join Grace and Thompson, handling criminal defense, administrative law, and some civil law. As a prosecutor he served in several supervisory positions, most recently as supervisor of Preliminary Hearings, Central Bond Court, Grand Jury, and Branch 66 Homicide/Sex Units. He has extensive criminal jury and bench trial experience. He has been a presenter on legal issues and a past member of the Judicial Evaluation Committee for the Chicago Bar Association. Attorneys and judges gave all positive comments about his legal knowledge and ability, stating that he is always prepared and knows the law, and is an excellent attorney. They reported that he is respectful, fair and even-tempered.

Mr. Murphy is considered to have good legal ability with an extensive litigation experience as a prosecutor. ISBA finds James V. Murphy qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Evaluated (through no fault of the candidate)

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Highly Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements
Chicago Federation of Labor
Teamsters Joint Council No. 25
Teamsters Local 700
IBEW Local 134
IUOE Local 399
Fraternal Order of Police, Chicago Lodge No. 7
------------------------------------------------------
Back to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2024 Cook County judicial race"

Organizing the Data: 7th Subcircuit - Solganick vacancy

Candidates are listed in the order that they appear on the ballot in the Democratic primary; no Republican filed for this vacancy. This post may be updated before the primary as new information becomes available.

Deidre Baumann - #161


Campaign Website
(newly added)

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Deidre Baumann did not participate in the Judicial Evaluation Committee (JEC) screening process and, therefore, according to The Chicago Bar Association’s governing resolution for the JEC, is automatically found NOT RECOMMENDED.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Deidre Baumann was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 1992. Since 2011, she has been Owner of Baumann & Shuldiner, where she focuses on litigation of civil rights, employment discrimination, personal injury, and criminal defense at the state, federal, and appellate level. Previously, she was a Partner at Baumann & Shuldiner (2004-2011) and Baumann, Shuldiner & Lee (2001- 2004), a Solo Practitioner (1996-2001), and an Associate at Michael Null & Associates (1993-1996). She is a member of a number of bar associations, including the Chicago Bar Association (Racial Justice Coalition, 2020-2021), the Decalogue Society of Lawyers (Board Member, 2017-present), the Illinois State Bar Association (Chair, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Committee), and the North Suburban Bar Association (President, 2005-2006).

Ms. Baumann is considered to have good legal ability. She has substantial litigation experience and is praised for her temperament. The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Ms. Deidre Baumann has been licensed since 1992. After working for a law firm in 1996 she opened her own firm, Baumann and Shuldiner, handling civil litigation in state and federal court. She is active with various bar associations and is currently president of the Suburban Bar Coalition and on the board of the Chicago’s LGBTQ+ Bar Association. Previously, she served as president of the Decalogue Society of Lawyers and the North Suburban Bar Association as well as on the executive board of the Women’s Bar Association of Illinois. She served on several committees for the Illinois State Bar Association and the Chicago Bar Association.

While attorneys report that she is professional with good writing skills, concerns were raised over a lack of punctuality and diligence at times. ISBA finds Ms. Bauman not qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended


------------------------------------------------------

Owens J. Shelby - #162


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Owens "Joe" Shelby is "Qualified" for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Shelby was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2007 and is currently serving as an Assistant Cook County State's Attorney, Second Chair, in the Felony Trial Division in the 4th Municipal District. Mr. Shelby has handled several felony and misdemeanor trials and has had some juvenile and civil experience.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Judge Owens J. Shelby was admitted to practice in 2007. He was appointed to the bench by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2023. Before taking the bench he had been a career Cook County Assistant State’s Attorney working as a second chair prosecutor in a felony trial courtroom. He did serve for less than a year as the Assistant Counsel to the Speaker of the Illinois House, and as a contract attorney with Loevy & Loevy in 2007 to 2008.

Judge Shelby is considered to have good legal ability with a very good temperament. He is praised for his diligence. As a practitioner, most lawyers praise his abilities although a few say he lacked adequate experience. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Hon. Owens Shelby has been licensed since 2007. In May 2023, he was appointed to the Circuit Court, after a previous career spent mainly as an assistant state’s attorney. He also spent a short time as Assistant Counsel to the Speaker of the Illinois House. He is currently assigned to the Traffic Division. As a prosecutor he worked in the Fourth District (Maywood) and in the Community Justice Center – West. He has been on the Boards of various community groups and also the National Black Prosecutors – Chicago Chapter, where he served as Treasurer. He has criminal jury and bench trial experience.

Attorneys generally reported that he has a solid legal knowledge and ability and knows how to apply the law to the facts. He is considered to be respectful of all with a solid character. ISBA finds Judge Owens Shelby qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Evaluated (through no fault of the candidate)

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Not Evaluated (through no fault of the candidate)

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements
Chicago Federation of Labor
IVI-IPO
Teamsters Joint Council No. 25
Teamsters Local 700
IBEW Local 134
IUOE Local 399
Girl, I Guess
Personal PAC
------------------------------------------------------
Back to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2024 Cook County judicial race"

Organizing the Data: 15th Subcircuit - Demacopoulos vacancy

Corrections made 3/16/24

Candidates are listed in the order that they appear on the ballot in the Democratic primary; no Republican filed for this vacancy. This post may be updated before the primary as new information becomes available.

Paul A. O'Grady - #161


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Paul O’Grady is “Not Recommended” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. O’Grady was admitted to practice law in November 2000. Mr. O’Grady is in private practice and supervises his firm’s litigation team. He was an Assistant State’s Attorney early in his career, but lacks current trial experience. Concerns about the Mr. O’Grady’s lack of trial experience and temperament resulted in Committee’s finding of “Not Recommended.”
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Paul O’Grady was admitted to practice in 2000. He is currently the managing partner at a private law firm overseeing attorneys doing litigation. He also serves as Counsel for the Village of Tinley Park. He has also served a partner at Querrey & Harrow, Ltd, and before that was an Assistant General Counsel, General Counsel, and Chief of Staff for the Cook County Sheriff’s Office. He started his career as an Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney.

Mr. O’Grady has substantial litigation experience in both state and federal courts. He is considered to have good legal ability and a good demeanor. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. Paul O’Grady has been licensed since 2000. He is currently the managing partner at Peterson, Johnson & Murray, where he oversees attorneys in general litigation, municipal law matters and insurance defense. He was previously a partner at Querrey & Harrow, and also both General Counsel and Chief of Staff for the Cook County Sheriff’s Office. His legal career began at the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office. He currently serves as Orland Township Supervisor and is a former Flossmoor police officer. He has litigation experience in both state and federal courts.

Attorneys contacted during the investigation all described him as being knowledgeable about the law, fair, even-keeled, diligent, and sensitive to the nature of his cases. ISBA finds Paul O’Grady qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

------------------------------------------------------

Allen Price Walker - #162


Campaign Website
(newly added)

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Pursuant to section 34 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, The Executive Committee has voted to issue a “Qualified” rating for Allen Price Walker’s current Circuit Court Judge candidacy.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Judge Allen Walker was admitted to practice in 1987. He is currently serving as an Associate Judge and has been on the bench since 2012. He is currently assigned to the Chancery Division and has been there since 2020. He served in the Law Division between 2017 and 2020 and heard mortgage foreclosure cases from 2012 to 2017. He previously was a partner at Greene and Letts, where he focused on representing and advising individuals, for-profit and not-for-profit corporations, and municipal entities in litigation and transactional matters. He has been active as a teacher at the UIC law school in Chicago and at the Illinois Judicial Education Conference.

Judge Walker is praised for his grasp of legal issues and for his court management. He is reported to be well prepared and is fair to all parties before him. He is reported to have good judicial temperament. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Hon. Allen Price Walker was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1987. Prior to his selection as an associate judge in 2012, he had practiced with Greene and Letts, rising to partner, focusing on commercial litigation, personal injury, medical malpractice, and transactional matters. He currently sits in the General Chancery Division with prior assignments in the Law Division, Traffic Division, and the Chancery Division – Mortgage Foreclosure courts. He sits on several Illinois Supreme Court committees and is president-elect of the Illinois Judicial Council. He is a member of various bar associations and has been on the Board of Managers of the Chicago Bar Association.

Attorneys consider him to be an expert in his field of prisoner petitions. He handles all cases without bias, follows the law and is diligent in his work. Reported to handle difficult litigants with respect, but remains firm about the need for respect to the court. ISBA finds Judge Allen Price Walker highly qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Highly Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Highly Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qaulified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsement
IVI-IPO
------------------------------------------------------

Luciano "Lou" Panici, Jr. - #163


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Luciano Panici, Jr. is “Not Recommended” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Panici was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2009. His practice includes being a Village prosecutor and hearing officer, defending municipalities in civil litigation, representing criminal defendants in lower-level felony and misdemeanor matters, personal injury plaintiff’s work and Secretary of State reinstatement hearings. Mr. Panici lacks significant complex litigation experience. At this stage in his career, his limited experience would make it difficult to effectively serve as a Circuit Court Judge.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Luciano Panici, Jr. was admitted to practice in 2009 and has worked in a small law firm throughout his career doing municipal representation, civil defense of municipal clients, election law, criminal defense, and real estate. He is currently an Administrative Hearing Officer for five municipalities and is the village prosecutor for two municipalities. He has substantial litigation experience. He is reported to have good legal ability and temperament and is praised for his knowledge of the law. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. Luciano Panici, Jr., has been licensed since 2009. Since that time, he has been an associate attorney with the Law Offices of Dennis Gianopolos, focusing on municipal law, criminal, DUI and traffic defense, election law and other general law as well. He is also an administrative hearing officer for five south suburban municipalities, and the part-time village prosecutor for Steger and Merrionette Park. He has no jury trial experience as lead counsel, one as assisting; he does have bench and quasi-trial experience. He is a Board member and former Vice President of the South Suburban Bar Association and a member of other bar groups and is a Township Trustee for Bloom Township.

Though concerns were raised about the depth and breadth of his legal experience, attorneys described him as having good legal knowledge and ability, with good temperament, impartiality and integrity. ISBA finds Luciano Panici, Jr. qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Not Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements
Chicago Federation of Labor
Teamsters Joint Council No. 25
Teamsters Local 700
IBEW Local 134
IUOE Local 399
AMVOTE PAC
------------------------------------------------------
Back to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2024 Cook County judicial race"