Start here for the most complete information about every 2026 Cook County judicial race

This post will get bumped up to the top of the front page of FWIW frequently in the days leading up to the March 17 priamry.

This is the interactive, voter-friendly part of FWIW. What follows is a list of every Cook County judicial vacancy on the March primary ballot.

The vacancies are listed on Democratic and Republican ballots alike.

However, the only candidates for any of these judicial vacancies on this year's ballot are in the Democratic primary. No candidates filed to run in the Republican Primary.

The following is not a partisan statement; it is merely a statement of fact: In the March 17 primary, in order to have any say in who serves in our local courts, one has to take a Democratic ballot.

Voters in the Democratic Primary may be additionally surprised to note how many judicial vacancies are uncontested.

Essentially, all of the persons running in uncontested races are as good as elected already.

Of course, not all races are uncontested. These are the ones voters should be looking for. All the contested races in the list below are live links. When you click on any of these, you will be taken to a post that will show all the candidates in that race, in ballot order, with all ratings and other information about each candidate that I've been able to assemble. Where a candidate has provided FWIW with a statement "in their own words", a link to that statement will be available from that post as well.

There is a link at the bottom of each of these Organizing the Data posts, so voters can examine each contested race in detail, one candidate at a time, and come right back here.

The linked posts will be updated as new information becomes available, right up until the polls close on the Feast of St. Patrick. Any errors of omission or commission in these posts are mine alone and deeply regretted.

What is not an error: You will note, if you visit the candidates' websites (and I encourage you to do this; that's why I include them) that the candidate may claim a number of endorsements that I don't include in the Organizing the Data posts. I only include endorsements that I can independently verify; the fact that, in some cases, a candidate will claim endorsements that I don't list does not necessarily mean that the candidate has inaccurately claimed an endorsement. Rather, it may mean (and usually means) only that I haven't (or haven't yet) confirmed a particular endorsement. You can read all FWIW posts about Cook County judicial candidate endorsements by clicking on this link. In the coming days, as I verify additional endorsements, I will add them to the proper Organizing the Data post at my earliest opportunity.

And now the list:

Countywide Vacancies

Appellate Court (Hoffman) - Uncontested

Circuit Court (Burke) - Uncontested
Circuit Court (Cobbs)
Circuit Court (Coghlan)
Circuit Court (Hooks) - Uncontested
Circuit Court (Karkula) - Uncontested

Subcircuit Vacancies

1st Subcircuit (Balanoff)
1st Subcircuit (Walker)

3rd Subcircuit (Murphy) - Uncontested
3rd Subcircuit (Sherlock)

5th Subcircuit (Ross) - Uncontested

8th Subcircuit (Gamrath)
8th Subcircuit (Mikva)

11th Subcircuit (McLean Meyerson)
11th Subcircuit (Roberts) - Uncontested

13th Subcircuit (Curry, Jr.) - Uncontested
13th Subcircuit (M. Kelley) - Uncontested
13th Subcircuit (T. Kelley) - Uncontested
13th Subcircuit (O'Malley) - Uncontested

16th Subcircuit (Baird) - Uncontested
16th Subcircuit (Mendoza) - Uncontested

17th Subcircuit (Brooks)
17th Subcircuit (Carroll)

18th Subcircuit (Andreou) - Uncontested
18th Subcircuit (Chrones) - Uncontested

19th Subcircuit (Fairman) - Uncontested
19th Subcircuit (Kane)

20th Subcircuit (Haracz) - Uncontested
20th Subcircuit (Miller)

What is going on with the Plumbers Union judicial endorsements?

Not as much as it first seemed: Updated with additional information

The Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' and Technical Engineers Local Union 130 UA has again updated its endorsements of judicial candidates in the forthcoming primary. The complete list is available at this link.

Yesterday, I updated my prior story on the Plumbers Union endorsements because the Plumbers had added Jarrett Knox, a candidadte for the McLean Meyerson vacancy in the 11th Subcircuit, to their list (the list had previously indicated that Local 130 was neutral in that race).

This morning, I was informed -- and I have since verified, linking above to the .pdf file online -- that, in the race for the Gamrath vacancy in the 8th Subcircuit, Local 130 has seemingly pulled its previous endorsement of Garson Fischer and endorsed Kathleen Cunniff Ori instead. I have updated the Organizing the Data post on that race accordingly.

The interesting thing, as you will note by following the Plumbers endorsement link, is that the document online is presented as a March 4 letter, with no indication of it being updated. But it has been... twice so far that I know of.

UPDATE: I reached out to the Plumbers Union to see if I could get any sort of explanation for the apparent change in endorsements, and I have now heard back from the Local 130's Political Director, Mr. John D'Amico. D'Amico told me there'd been no change in endorsements; nobody's endorsement got pulled. Garson Fischer's name got included by mistake, D'Amico said. Local 130 had endorsed Kathleen Cunniff Ori for the Gamrath vacancy and Jarrett Knox for the McLean Meyerson vacancy, D'Amico told me, and both were sent letters to that effect. But the list was long and, well, mistakes were made. Typos, really.

I can certainly understand that... as FWIW readers have pointed out several times over the years....

So, for the sake of clarity, here is the list of endorsements made by Local 130 -- not updated, not changed, but merely corrected:

Countywide Vacancies

Cobbs Vacancy - Luz Maria Toledo
Coughlin Vacancy - Michael Cabonargi

Subcircuit Vacancies

1st Subcircuit (Balanoff) - Radiance Ward
1st Subcircuit (Walker) - Ashley Greer Shambley

3rd Subcircuit (Sherlock) - Neutral

8th Subcircuit (Gamrath) - Kathleen Cunniff Ori
8th Subcircuit (Mikva) - Katherine C. Morrison

11th Subcircuit (McLean Meyerson) - Jarrett Knox

17th Subcircuit (Brooks) - Meridth Hammer
17th Subcircuit (Carroll) - André Thapedi

19th Subcircuit (Kane) - John Harkins

20th Subcircuit (Miller) - Jon Stromsta

All relevant Organizing the Data posts have already been updated.

------------------------------------------------------
For further reading: "Start here for the most complete information about every 2026 Cook County judicial race"

Hellenic Bar Association to hold Women's Forum on March 19

The Hellenic Bar Association will hold its 5th Annual Women's Forum on Thursday, March 19, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the offices of Latham & Watkins, 330 N. Wabash. Organizers say, "This year's forum is dedicated to finding your voice and using it to advocate for the good of others and for yourself."

The panelists scheduled to present at this event are:

• Dr. Georgia Giakoumis Spear, Chief of Breast Imaging and Vice Chair of Women's Imaging at Northwestern Medicine,


• Irene Savanis Fiorentinos, former Of Counsel at Jones Day, and


• Pamela Savvides, Assistant General Counsel at Commonwealth Edison and HBA President.

Milteva Andonellis will serve as moderator for the program.

Tickets are $25 each (free for HBA members, students, and judges), but reservations are required. The deadline to register is March 17. Tickets are available at this Eventbrite link.

Girl, I Guess pulls candidate endorsement because candidate was also endorsed by the FOP - or - why I hate politics, part 6,239

Just last Thursday, I reported on the endorsements issued by the Fraternal Order of Police John Dineen Lodge No. 7.

In my post about the FOP endorsements, I noted that the Lodge had endorsed one of the candidates also endorsed by the authors of the Girl, I Guess Progessive Voter Guide. I'd reported on the Girl, I Guess endorsements back on February 18. I reported on these first because they were available sooner. The FOP endorsements did not come out until last week.

In last week's article, I suggested that if endorsers so radically different as the FOP and Girl, I Guess favored the same judicial candidate, it would say something wholly positive about that candidate's reputation for fairness.

Why? Because judges are different from politicians -- well, they're supposed to be different -- because judges don't make the laws (again, they're not supposed to), rather they interpret and apply the laws made by others. A group should care whether they, or their supporters, could get a fair hearing from a judge, whether the judge would listen carefully, and rule honestly, in accordance with the law, regardless of the judge's possible political sympathies. If wildly different endorsers, with irreconcilable views, each determine that a judicial candidate would be fair to their side, that should be a strong point in that candidate's favor.

Contrast this with other politicians, with legislators or executives (mayors, governors, presidents). If a state legislator, say, professed to be the champion of his police constituents, but loyally supported legislation that undermined public safety generally and police in particular, that would say something quite negative about the legislator. Because a legislator could not try to curry favor with both the FOP and the ACAB-Abolitionist-Defund crowd in good faith....... but this could never happen, right?

This is an over-generalization, but one that I think holds up: The difference lies in the different functions of a judge as opposed to other politicians. The judge is focused on the case in court, on the parties before him or her, on their credibility, and how the law applies in the case at bar, while other politicians are supposed to take a longer view -- on statistics and trends and future impacts -- on policies -- on the Big Picture. Where we get in trouble, these days, is that legislators all too often take specific (usually tragic) cases and try and inflate these into statutes, while too many judges use cases before them as vehicles to enact policy changes. But I digress.

Anyway, last week, I thought it a good thing that, in one 8th Subcircuit race, the FOP and Girl, I Guess both endorsed the same candidate, and I said so. I tried to explain there what I've tried to explain again here.

But I must have done a bad job.

Becuase Girl, I Guess promptly pulled its endorsement of that candidate, saying, in pertinent part (quoting from the site, accessed yesterday):

Girl, I Guess is revoking the endorsement of Elizabeth Christina Dibler, who was endorsed by, and has accepted the endorsement of the Chicago FOP. Allegiance to the MAGA-aligned FOP, headed by hatemonger John Catanzara, is utterly disqualifying for this Guide, due to the long history of Chicago police not being held accountable for murder, brutality, and rampant abuse of power (only 8% of police misconduct reports between 1988 and 2023 resulted in discipline). We need judges who will use their full power to hold the police in check, not enable their violent impulses which brutalize hundreds each year and cost Chicago taxpayers nearly half a billion dollars in settlements since 2019, and nearly a full billion since 2011. Diber, who would apparently rather lick the boots of the police than hold them accountable, cannot do that.

I truly hate modern politics.

Girl, I Guess has endorsed Kathleen Cunniff Ori in Dibler's stead, and I've updated the Organizing the Data post on the 8th Subcircuit Gamrath race accordingly.

Please note: Nothing I've said here is intended as, nor should it be construed by the reader as, an endorsement of Ms. Dibler, or as a knock or slight against Ms. Cunniff Ori. I don't know either candidate and I don't live in the 8th Subcircuit. In saying, as I have here, with judicial candidates, it is probably a good thing for diametrically opposed endorsers to settle on a particular candidate, I am speaking generally. This is not the first time an endorsement has been pulled in a judicial race because of a candidate subsequently received the endorsement of the FOP, and I complained about it when it happened then, too.

On the other hand, I appreciate how difficult it is to secure endorsements from anyone -- it's something I never managed -- and, I suppose, if you say I can see why, I will just have to nod sadly in agreement -- so I can not find it in myself to criticize a candidate who works hard to secure an endorsement, and who will be justly proud of it. Also, I completely agree that the authors of Girl, I Guess are entirely privileged to make, or pull, any endorsement they please. But I also have the right to complain about it, as I have here.

I believe this may be an instance where the modern adage don't hate the players, hate the game is applicable. This morning, I hate the game.

------------------------------------------------------
For further information, go to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2026 Cook County judicial race"

Chicago Council of Lawyers releases narrative explanations of ratings for Cook County judicial candidates in Subcircuits 13 to 20

The Chicago Council of Lawyers has released the narratives explaining its evaluation of Cook County judicial candidates in the March 17 primary. (Well, most of them, anyway.) The Council's report may be found by clicking this link; if that doesn't work, they may be accessed from the VoteForJudges.org home page.

The CCL report lists candidate evaluations in alphabetical order. Voters may find it more useful to see what the Council thinks of candidates seeking each vacancy, particularly in (those all too few) contested races. Thus, in this post, we will look at the Council's evaluations of candidates seeking vacancies in Subcircuits 13 through 20; in prior posts, we have looked at the Council's evaluations of countywide judicial candidates and candidates in Subcircuits 1 through 11.

Now that these posts are complete, I'll get to work updating the Organizing the Data posts to include the Council's narratives. Be patient; I'll get it done as soon as I can.

13th Subcircuit

Curry Vacancy

Robert Groebner - Qualified

Mr. Groebner receives praise for legal ability, integrity, temperament, and punctuality. He appears to have a strong reputation among the defense bar. Mr. Groebner has significant litigation experience and the experience to run a courtroom.

The Council finds Mr. Groebner Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Martin Kelley Vacancy

Brittany Pedersen - Qualified

Brittany Pedersen was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2009. She began her career in the Kane County Public Defender’s office. In 2012, she began working as a solo practitioner in private practice and has focused her practice on criminal defense, family law, civil litigation, real estate and contract disputes.

Ms. Pedersen is described as a passionate and zealous advocate. She was called a skilled attorney and is considered an excellent litigator. She has been described as knowledgeable with a professional demeanor.

The Council finds Ms. Pedersen Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Thomas Kelley Vacancy

William Kelley - Qualified

William Kelley was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1980. He served in a clerkship with the Louisiana Supreme Court in the Criminal Appeals Division for one year. Since 1982, he has been in private practice.

Mr. Kelley is considered to have a fine temperament and very good legal knowledge. He has extensive experience supervising cases.

The Council finds Mr. Kelley qualified for the Circuit Court.

O'Malley Vacancy

Daniel Naranjo - Qualified

Daniel Naranjo was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2000. Prior to his appointment to the bench, he worked as an Assistant Public Defender III in the Cook County Public Defender’s Office for 25 years, and prior to that he worked in private practice for three years.

Mr. Naranjo is praised for his legal knowledge and ability, and described as an excellent trial attorney. He is considered sensitive to bias, with good character, and temperament.

The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.

16th Subcircuit

Baird Vacancy

Julian Sanchez Crozier - Qualified

Julian Sanchez Crozier was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2013.

Evaluators consistently describe him as exceptionally intelligent, deeply knowledgeable, and possessing strong legal judgment and integrity. He is praised for his even temperament, diligence, and commitment to community outreach.

The Council finds Julian Sanchez Crozier Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Mendoza Vacancy

Jessica Velez - Not Qualified

Ms. Velez is considered calm, pleasant and bright. However, she lacks trial experience and it is difficult to assess her legal ability at this time. It is possible the candidate has the ability to become a good judge but on balance, she has not demonstrated that ability sufficiently to be recommended at this time.

The Council finds Ms. Velez Not Qualified for the Circuit Court.

17th Subcircuit

Brooks Vacancy

Natalia Moore - Not Recommended

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Not Recommended rating because this candidate did not participate in the Alliance screening process. - Ed.)

Meridth Hammer - Not Qualified

Meridth Hammer was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2020 and the Indiana Bar in 2001. Since 2024, she has been First Deputy General Counsel for the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County. Previously, she has been an administrative law judge for the Illinois Department of Employment Security and in private practice.

Many attorneys were positive about her temperament and consider her capable and forthright. Although there are some concerns about the level of complexity of matters she has handled in her career, we believe the candidate has shown sufficient experience to find her qualified as a candidate. However, significant concerns about Ms. Hammer’s residency have been raised and the Council is not comfortable recommending her for the Circuit Court of Cook County at this time.

The Council finds Meridith Hammer Not Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Carroll Vacancy

Amari Dawson - Not Recommended

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Not Recommended rating because this candidate did not participate in the Alliance screening process. - Ed.)

Bianca B. Brown - Qualified

Bianca B. Brown was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2010. Her diverse career includes service at the Cook County State's Attorney's Office, City of Chicago, Illinois Attorney General's Office, CTA, and as an ARDC hearing board member. She is praised for her legal knowledge, integrity, and excellent temperament, though some concerns about attention to detail were noted. The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.

André Thapedi - Not Recommended

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Not Recommended rating because this candidate did not participate in the Alliance screening process. - Ed.)

18th Subcircuit

Andreou Vacancy

Samuel Bae - Qualified

Samuel S. Bae was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1999 and to the Texas bar in 2005. He has been in private practice.

Mr. Bae is reported to have good legal ability and does a good job representing his clients. The Chicago Council of Lawyers previously found him not qualified but believes he has since gained sufficient additional experience.

On balance, the Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Chrones Vacancy

Juan Ponce de Leon - Qualified

Juan Ponce de Leon was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2009. Since 2010, he has been a Public Defender in Cook County.

The Council finds Juan Ponce de Leon Qualified for the Circuit Court.

19th Subcircuit

Fairman Vacancy

Sara McGann - Qualified

(This evaluation was issued prior to Judge McGann's appointment to the bench. - Ed.) Sara McGann was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2009. She serves as an Assistant State’s Attorney in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, focusing on appellate law.

Ms. McGann is described as thoughtful and intelligent. She is consistently composed and professional. She is considered a mentor because of her knowledge, communication skills and approachability.

The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Kane Vacancy

Monica Gail Somerville - Qualified

Monica Gail Somerville was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1990. Ms. Somerville is presently a staff attorney with Cabrini Green Legal Aid. She has had a varied career, including service in a variety of capacities with the City of Chicago, as an Administrative Law Judge with the Illinois Department of Employment Security, a senior attorney with the Cook County Forest Preserve, litigation counsel with the ARDC, and an attorney with the USPS Law Department.

Ms. Somerville is considered to have good legal ability. She is praised for her supervisor skills and for her ability to manage complex government programs. She has litigation experience. She is reported to have a good temperament.

The Council finds Ms. Somerville Qualified for the Circuit Court.

John Harkins - Not Recommended

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Not Recommended rating. - Ed.)

Dave Condron - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

20th Subcircuit

Haracz Vacancy

Michael J. Zink - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Miller Vacancy

Jon Stromsta - Qualified

Jon K. Stromsta was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1985. He is currently an Administrative Law Judge with the Illinois Department of Employment Security and is a panel arbitrator with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Previously, he was with the Office of the State Appellate Defender and an attorney for the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare and Pension Funds.

Mr. Stromsta is praised for his demeanor and integrity. Mr. Stromsta is considered to have good legal ability and is widely respected for his knowledge of the law in a variety of areas.

The Council finds Jon Stromsta Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Belle Katubig - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Chicago Council of Lawyers releases narrative explanations of ratings for Cook County judicial candidates in Subcircuits 1 to 11

The Chicago Council of Lawyers has released the narratives explaining its evaluation of Cook County judicial candidates in the March 17 primary. (Well, most of them, anyway.) The Council's report may be found by clicking this link; if that doesn't work, the report may be accessed from the VoteForJudges.org home page.

The CCL report lists candidate evaluations in alphabetical order. Voters may find it more useful to see what the Council thinks of candidates seeking each vacancy, particularly in (those all too few) contested races. So, in this post, we will break down the Council's evaluations candidates seeking vacancies in Subcircuits 1-11. In the last post, we reviewed the CCL's narratives of candidates seeking countywide judicial vacancies. In the next post, we will look at the Council's evaluations of candidates in Subcircuits 13-20.

As soon as these are all done, I'll get to work updating the Organizing the Data posts to include the Council's narratives. Be patient; I'll get this all done as soon as I can.

1st Subcircuit

Balanoff Vacancy

Radiance Ward - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Natalie L. Howse - Not Recommended

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Not Recommended rating because this candidate did not participate in the Alliance screening process. - Ed.)

Walker Vacancy

Ashley Green Shambley - Qualified

Ashley Nicole Shambley was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2010. She serves as a Cook County Public Defender and was previously in private practice.

Ms. Shambley has a good reputation with regard to her legal ability and knowledge.

The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Ginger Odom - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Tiffany N. Brooks

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Not Recommended rating because this candidate did not participate in the Alliance screening process. - Ed.)

3rd Subcircuit

Murphy Vacancy

John Carroll - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Sherlock Vacancy

Martin Douglas Reggi - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Rachel Marrello - Qualified

Rachel Marrello was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2000.

The Council finds Rachel Marrello qualified for the Circuit Court.

5th Subcircuit

Ross Vacancy

Stephanie Kelly - Qualified
Stephanie Kelly was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2001. She has been in both private practice and in-house in the field of Labor and Employment law.

Ms. Kelly’s career has included extensive experience in handling administrative hearings similar to litigation in other courts and experience supervising litigation in various courts. She is described as diligent and professional. While her courtroom experience is from earlier in her career, we believe she is qualified to transition to the bench.

The Council finds Stephanie Kelly Qualified for the Circuit Court.

8th Subcircuit

Gamrath Vacancy

Kathleen Cunniff Ori - Qualified

Kathleen Ori was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2007. Since 2017, she has served as an Assistant State's Attorney in Cook County. Previously, she was in private practice.

The Council finds Ms. Ori Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Elizabeth Christina Dibler - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Garson Fischer - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Mikva Vacancy

Lester Finkle - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Daniel Balanoff - Not Qualified

Daniel Balanoff was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2007. He has been in private practice since admission. Mr. Balanoff also served one year as Chief Legal Officer/Director of Special Projects in the Second District of the Cook County Board of Review (Property Tax Appeal Board).

Mr. Balanoff has some litigation experience, but the Council has concerns about his litigation skills in more complex cases. While he is described as professional and respectful, some concerns have been raised about his integrity.

The Council finds [Daniel] Balanoff Not Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Katherine Morrison - Qualified

Katherine Carole Morrison was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2012. Since 2018, she has been a partner in private practice, handling medical malpractice defense cases and defense of section 1983 civil rights cases. She has been in private practice since admission to the bar.

Ms. Morrison is considered to have good legal ability. She is praised for her diligence and work ethic. She is reported to have good temperament.

The Council finds Ms. Morrison Qualified for the Circuit Court.

11th Subcircuit

McLean Meyerson Vacancy

Jarrett Knox - Qualified

Jarrett Knox was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2014. He previously worked as an Equal Justice Works Fellow and is with the Cook County Public Defender’s Office.

Mr. Knox is described as smart, knowledgeable, and thorough. He is also praised for his honesty, fairness, and impartiality.

The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.

John Carrozza - Qualified

John Carrozza was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2005. He has been in private practice since 2009.

Everyone interviewed stated that Mr. Carrozza has impeccable character and integrity. He is described as “professional, prepared and polite”. He is calm and even-tempered. He has a wide perspective of the law and a wide range of clients.

The Council finds Mr. Carrozza qualified for the Circuit Court.

Roberts Vacancy

Kim Przekota - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

Chicago Council of Lawyers releases candidate narratives in countywide judicial races

The Chicago Council of Lawyers has released the narratives explaining its evaluation of Cook County judicial candidates in the March 17 primary. (Well, most of them, anyway.) The Council's report may be found by clicking this link; if that doesn't work, they may be accessed from the VoteForJudges.org home page.

The CCL report lists candidate evaluations in alphabetical order. Voters may find it more useful to see what the Council thinks of candidates seeking each vacancy, particularly in (those all too few) contested races. So, in this post, we will break down the Council's evaluations of countywide judicial races (including the uncontested Appellate Court race). In the next post, we will look at the Council's evaluations of candidates in Subcircuits 1-11 and, in a third post, we will look at the Council's evaluations of candidates in Subcircuits 13-20.

As soon as all that's done, I'll get to work updating the Organizing the Data posts to include the Council's narratives. Be patient; I'll get it done as soon as I can.

Before we begin, though, I just want to highlight one paragraph from the Council's lengthy explanation of how its candidate evaluation process. As always, I commend the entire document, linked above, for your consideration. But -- perhaps in light of recent events involving the Council -- it is worthwhile to single out this particular paragraph, and especially the first sentence thereof:

The Council does not evaluate candidates based on their substantive views of political or social issues. Nor do we take into account the particular race in which a candidate is running or the candidates against whom a candidate is running. We apply a uniform standard for all countywide and subcircuit elections because judges elected through either method can be assigned to any judicial position in the Circuit Court.

With that preface, we begin with the CCL's evluation of the only Appellate Court candidate:

Hon. Judith Rice - Qualified

Judith Rice was admitted to practice law in 1988. She was elected to the bench in 2104 and served in both First Municipal and Domestic Relations. Since 2021, she has served as Presiding Judge of the Domestic Violence Division.

Judith Rice is considered to be very smart and has extensive experience as a government official and in the banking sector. She is reported to have a very good temperament and a high degree of professionalism. She is praised as an excellent administrator and dedicated public servant.

The Council finds her Qualified for the [Appellate] Court.

Countywide Vacancies

Burke Vacancy

Steven Q. McKenzie - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave a Qualified rating to this candidate. - Ed.)

Cobbs Vacancy

Luz Maria Toledo - Qualified

Luz Maria Toledo was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2006. She has worked with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office since 2007. She is currently assigned to the Civil Actions Bureau, Real estate litigation practice, where she handles real estate tax matters. Prior to that, she spent over 10 years in the criminal division, where she prosecuted traffic, misdemeanor, and felony cases.

Ms. Toledo received high marks from all who were interviewed. She has a vast amount of trial experience in both criminal and civil matters and is considered to have good legal ability and knowledge. She is reported to have “outstanding character,” to treat everyone fairly and impartially, and to have a good disposition.

The Council finds Ms. Toledo Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Linda Sackey - Qualified

(This evaluation was prepared before Judge Sackey was appointed to the bench. - Ed.) Linda Sackey was admitted to practice in 2006. Ms. Sackey has served as a judicial law clerk for Illinois Supreme Court Chief Justice Mary Jane Theis, since 2019. She served from 2013 to 2018 as an Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Appeals Division of the Illinois Attorney General’s Office, from 2008-2013 as an associate with a law firm, and from 2006-2008 as a staff law clerk for the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Linda Sackey has exceptional legal ability and knowledge. She is praised for her writing ability and for her integrity, and is reported to have a good temperament. She has substantial appellate litigation experience.

The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.

Coghlan Vacancy

Ashonta C. Rice - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave a Qualified rating to this candidate. - Ed.)

Michael Carbonargi - Well Qualified^*

(This evaluation was prepared before Judge Cabonargi was appointed to the bench. - Ed.) Michael Mario Carbonargi was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2001. He is currently Counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee and brings extensive legal experience from the SEC, Cook County Board of Review, and ARDC hearing board.

Mr. Carbonargi received unanimous praise for his intelligence, ethics, and fairness.

The Council finds him Well Qualified for the Circuit Court.

----------------------------
^* Since this rating was finalized, some additional information has come to light that has been summarized on the Injustice Watch website, at https://2026primary.injusticewatch.org/candidate/michael-cabonargi-34872 and was not covered in our prior investigation. Because we have not had an opportunity to investigate further and there is not sufficient time to do so or to provide due process to the candidate, our rating remains the same.

Hooks Vacancy

Ava George Stewart - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave a Qualified rating to this candidate. - Ed.)

Karkula Vacancy

D'Anthony "Tony" Thedford - Qualified

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave a Qualified rating to this candidate. - Ed.)

Organizing the Data: 17th Subcircuit - Brooks vacancy

Updated 3/9/26

Candidates are listed in the order that they appear on the ballot in the Democratic primary; no Republican filed for any Cook County judicial vacancy for the 2026 primary. This post may be updated before the primary as new information becomes available.

Natalia Moore - #141

Campaign Website


Natalia Moore: In her own words

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Natalia Moore declined to participate in the Judicial Evaluation Committee (JEC) screening process and, therefore, according to The Chicago Bar Association’s governing resolution for the JEC, is automatically found NOT RECOMMENDED.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Not Recommended rating because this candidate did not participate in the Alliance screening process. - Ed.)

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Public records show that Natalia Moore was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2008 and is with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office. Ms. Moore declined to participate in the judicial evaluation process. Pursuant to ISBA guidelines, Natalia Moore is not recommended for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Not Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Not Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Not Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Not Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Not Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Endorsement

Girl, I Guess Progressive Voters Guide

------------------------------------------------------

Meridth Hammer - #142

Campaign Website


Meridth Hammer: In her own words

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Meridth Hammer declined to participate in the Judicial Evaluation Committee (JEC) screening process and, therefore, according to The Chicago Bar Association’s governing resolution for the JEC, is automatically found NOT RECOMMENDED.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

Meridth Hammer was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2020 and the Indiana Bar in 2001. Since 2024, she has been First Deputy General Counsel for the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County. Previously, she has been an administrative law judge for the Illinois Department of Employment Security and in private practice.

Many attorneys were positive about her temperament and consider her capable and forthright. Although there are some concerns about the level of complexity of matters she has handled in her career, we believe the candidate has shown sufficient experience to find her qualified as a candidate. However, significant concerns about Ms. Hammer’s residency have been raised and the Council is not comfortable recommending her for the Circuit Court of Cook County at this time.

The Council finds Meridith Hammer Not Qualified for the Circuit Court.

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Meridth Hammer was admitted to the Illinois bar in March 2020 and the Indiana bar in November 2001; her license in Indiana is still active. In July of 2025 she returned to private practice after serving for the second time as First Deputy General Counsel for the Clerk of the Circuit Court, having previously served in that position from 2019 to 2021. Her duties included employment matters, ensuring compliance with laws and rules and legal research. Between 2021 and 2024 she was a supervising administrative law judge for the Illinois Department of Employment Security. Prior to 2019 she was based in Indianapolis, working for several tech-related firms and as corporate counsel for the Crosstown Community Development Corp. in addition to being the lead attorney for The Hammer Legal Group handling business real estate transactions. She has not handled any jury trials, she does report over 100 bench trials and 100 quasi-trial matters. She is a member of the Disciplinary Commission Hearing Board for the Attorney and Registrations Disciplinary Commission and has been a committee member with the Black Women Lawyers’ Association.

Most people contacted gave Ms. Hammer positive comments on her legal knowledge and said she is impartial, prepared and professional. There are concerns about the lack of depth and breadth of her experience and her lack of complex litigation experience. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Meridth Hammer not qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Not Qualified

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Not Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Not Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Not Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Not Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Endorsements

Chicago Federation of Labor
AMVOTE PAC
IUOE Local 399
IBEW Local 134
Plumbers Local 130 UA

------------------------------------------------------
Back to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2026 Cook County judicial race"

Organizing the Data: 8th Subcircuit - Mikva vacancy

Updated 3/9/26

Candidates are listed in the order that they appear on the ballot in the Democratic primary; no Republican filed for any Cook County judicial vacancy for the 2026 primary. This post may be updated before the primary as new information becomes available.

Lester Finkle - #144

Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Pursuant to Section 34 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, The Executive Committee has voted to issue a “Qualified” rating for [Finkle's] current Circuit Court Judge candidacy.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Lester W. Finkle was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1982. In May 2025, he was appointed to fill the vacancy of Justice Mary L. Mikva. From 1984 to 2021, Mr. Finkle was with the Office of the Cook County Public Defender presenting more than fifty oral arguments before the Illinois Supreme and Appellate courts. At the time of his judicial appointment, he was with Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer as an appellate practitioner. Since 1997 he has served as an adjunct professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Law (formerly The John Marshall Law School).

Judge Finkle is reported to be the “go to” person; incredibly knowledgeable in the interpretation and analysis of case law; personable; and is sensitive to diversity and bias. His first assignment was in Traffic Division, six weeks later he was reassigned to the Domestic Violence Division. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Lester Finkle qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Evaluated through no fault of candidate

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Qualified

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Highly Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsement

Girl, I Guess Progressive Voter Guide

------------------------------------------------------

Dan Balanoff - #145

Campaign Website

(NB: This site was down on the evening of Tuesday, March 5; the candidate is aware of the problem and told FWIW that he is taking steps to get the site back online.)

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Daniel C. Balanoff is “Not Recommended” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Balanoff was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2007. He is a solo practitioner representing clients in bankruptcy, probate, real estate and estate planning matters. He also served as Chief Legal Officer for the Cook County Board of Review, District 2. Mr. Balanoff’s dedication to community service and pro bono work is commendable and reflects a strong commitment to public interest.

Mr. Balanoff was the subject of an employment discrimination suit in which he and his Board of Review supervisor were sued. The case was quickly settled and no findings resulted. In addition, Mr. Balanoff was found to have violated the Cook County ethics code in connection with his role on the tax board. He dismissed the ethics board findings as politically motivated. Both matters are recent and raise concerns regarding his judgment.

Additionally, while Mr. Balanoff’s work at the tax board provided some trial experience, those matters were relatively limited in scope and brief in duration. Broader and more substantive litigation experience, particularly in jury trials and complex legal issues, would provide a stronger foundation for confident, well-informed judicial decision-making in more legally intricate matters.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

Daniel Balanoff was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2007. He has been in private practice since admission. Mr. Balanoff also served one year as Chief Legal Officer/Director of Special Projects in the Second District of the Cook County Board of Review (Property Tax Appeal Board).

Mr. Balanoff has some litigation experience, but the Council has concerns about his litigation skills in more complex cases. While he is described as professional and respectful, some concerns have been raised about his integrity.

The Council finds [Daniel] Balanoff Not Qualified for the Circuit Court.

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Daniel C. Balanoff was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2007. He is a solo practitioner with a general practice focusing on estate planning, probate, real estate, bankruptcy, and personal injury. Until June of 2025 he also held the position of Chief Legal Officer/Director of Special Projects for the Cook County Board of Review Property Tax Appeal Board for District 2 where he advised on legal, regulatory and procedural issues and defenders’ assessments. He has presented at various CLE seminars, was a speaker a various Board of Review outreach events, and has been a moot court judge. He reports no jury or bench trials.

Attorneys reported that Mr. Balanoff is capable and articulate in his area, as well as being considerate, patient and professional. Concerns were raised about his limited area of practice and the depth and breadth of his legal experience. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Dan Balanoff not qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Not Evaulated through no fault of the candidate

Asian American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Not Qualified

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Not Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Not Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Not Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended


------------------------------------------------------

Katherine Carole Morrison - #146

Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Katherine Carole Morrison is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Morrison was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2012. She has been involved in various other organizations, including the Women’s Bar Association of Illinois, The Chicago Bar Association, and Lawyers Lend-A-Hand. She is a partner at Burns Noland LLP, where she has practiced personal injury and civil rights cases on the defense side. Ms. Morrison has an impressive background regarding high-end legal work regarding nursing home cases. She received high praise for her intelligence, diligence, and legal knowledge.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

Katherine Carole Morrison was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2012. Since 2018, she has been a partner in private practice, handling medical malpractice defense cases and defense of section 1983 civil rights cases. She has been in private practice since admission to the bar.

Ms. Morrison is considered to have good legal ability. She is praised for her diligence and work ethic. She is reported to have good temperament.

The Council finds Ms. Morrison Qualified for the Circuit Court.

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Katherine Carole Morrison was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2012. After first spending several years at Dykema, in 2018 she joined Burns Noland LLP where she is a partner focusing on medical malpractice defense and civil rights/section 1983 defense cases. She reports having one jury trial as lead counsel, two as associate, but none in the last few years. She has been a member of the Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee and is a member of the Women’s Bar Association of Illinois. She has also served as chair of the diversity and inclusion committee at her firm.

While attorneys contacted gave positive feedback on Ms. Morrison’s legal knowledge and ability, stating that she is well-prepared, organized and patient, concerns were raised about the depth and breadth of her litigation experience. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Katherine Carole Morrison not qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Qualified

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements

Chicago Federation of Labor
AMVOTE PAC
IUOE Local 399
IBEW Local 134
Chicago FOP John Dineen Lodge No. 7
Plumbers Local 130 UA
IUOE Local 150

------------------------------------------------------
Back to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2026 Cook County judicial race"

Organizing the Data: 8th Subcircuit - Gamrath vacancy

Updated 3/9/26
Updated 3/10/26

Candidates are listed in the order that they appear on the ballot in the Democratic primary; no Republican filed for any Cook County judicial vacancy for the 2026 primary. This post may be updated before the primary as new information becomes available.

Kathleen Cunniff Ori - #141

Candidate Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Kathleen Cunniff Ori is "Qualified" for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Ori was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2007. She began her legal career as a law clerk initially for Judge Michael M. Mihm of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois and then for Judge William J. Bauer of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. She then was in private practice prior to joining the Cook County State's Attorney's Office, where she currently serves as Deputy Supervisor in Labor and Employment. Ms. Ori is committed to community service and is highly regarded for her integrity, legal knowledge and trial experience, and temperament. She possesses the requisite qualifications for service as a Circuit Court Judge.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

Kathleen Ori was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2007. Since 2017, she has served as an Assistant State's Attorney in Cook County. Previously, she was in private practice.

The Council finds Ms. Ori Qualified for the Circuit Court.

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Kathleen Cunniff Ori was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2007. Since 2017 she has served as a Cook County State’s Attorney where she is currently assigned to the Special Litigation Division handling cases of labor and employment law. Previously, she was in private practice with McGuireWoods and clerked for a U.S. District judge and a U.S. Appellate Court judge.

Ms. Ori is described as a thorough and talented writer and researcher, having a good grasp of the law and effective at explaining it to other people; is quite competent and well-respected by colleagues, opposing counsels and judges. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Kathleen Cunniff Ori qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Qualified

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Not Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements

Girl, I Guess Progressive Voter Guide
Plumbers Local 130 UA

------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth Christina Dibler - #142

Candidate Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Pursuant to Section 34 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, The Executive Committee has voted to issue a “Qualified” rating for [Dibler's] current Circuit Court Judge candidacy.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Elizabeth Christina Dibler was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2003. She has spent her career with the Cook County State Attorney’s Office, presently First Chair in the Criminal Prosecutions Bureau since 2018. Before this she served in the Felony Trial Division where she supervised other attorneys. She has extensive jury and bench trial experience in complex matters.

Ms. Dibler volunteers in her community and participated in mock trial competitions. She is described as being highly proficient and very knowledgeable. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Elizabeth Christina Dibler qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Not Evaluated through no fault of the candidate

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Highly Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Highly Recommended

Endorsements

Chicago FOP John Dineen Lodge No. 7
United Hellenic Voters of America

------------------------------------------------------

Garson Fischer - #143

Candidate Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Garson Fischer is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Fischer was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2005. He has been an attorney in the Illinois Attorney General’s Office since 2005. He currently serves as Deputy Chief for Criminal Appeals. Mr. Fischer possesses extensive knowledge of criminal law and demonstrates a calm and thoughtful temperament. He presents as intelligent, articulate, and carries himself with professionalism. His demeanor is well suited for the bench. Mr. Fischer possesses the requisite qualifications for service as a Circuit Court Judge.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Garson Fischer was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2005. Additionally, he is admitted and active in the Northern, Central and Southern Districts of Illinois (2006) and the U.S. Supreme Court (2009). Since 2005 Mr. Fischer has been with the Illinois Attorney General’s Office as a Deputy Chief of Criminal Appeals.

Mr. Fischer has been commended for his legal knowledge; is sensitive to ethnic diversity; is very professional and has received praise from his adversarial opponents for his legal ability, demeanor and temperament. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Garson Fischer qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Qualified

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Not Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements

Chicago Federation of Labor
IUOE Local 399
IBEW Local 134

------------------------------------------------------
Back to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2026 Cook County judicial race"

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, has made some endorsements in Cook County judicial races

The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, has announced endorsements in a great many races, both in Cook County and surrounding counties, including a number of Illinois congressional races. For a complete list of Local 150's endorsements, click here. In contested Cook County judicial races, Local 150 has made the following endorsements:

Countywide Vacancies

Coughlin Vacancy - Michael Cabonargi

Subcircuit Vacancies

1st Subcircuit (Walker) - Tiffany N. Brooks

8th Subcircuit (Mikva) - Katherine C. Morrison

17th Subcircuit (Carroll) - André Thapedi

20th Subcircuit (Miller) - Jon Stromsta

Already-posted Organizing the Data posts will be updated as soon as possible.

------------------------------------------------------
For further reading: "Start here for the most complete information about every 2026 Cook County judicial race"

Organizing the Data: 1st Subcircuit - Walker vacancy

Updated 3/9/26

Candidates are listed in the order that they appear on the ballot in the Democratic primary; no Republican filed for any Cook County judicial vacancy for the 2026 primary. This post may be updated before the primary as new information becomes available.

Ashley Greer Shambley - #143

Campaign Website


Ashley Greer Shambley: In her own words

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Ashley Shambley is "Qualified" for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Shambley was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2010. She has over 14 years of experience as a public defender, handling complex homicide cases. Ms. Shambley is actively involved in her community and various charities and has a deep level of commitment to public service. She is respected for her integrity, knowledge of the law, and excellent demeanor and possesses the requisite qualifications to serve as a Circuit Court Judge.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

Ashley Nicole Shambley was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2010. She serves as a Cook County Public Defender and was previously in private practice.

Ms. Shambley has a good reputation with regard to her legal ability and knowledge.

The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Ashley Greer Shambley was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2010. She started her career as an associate in the Law office of John F. Lyke. Since 2012 she has been an Assistant Public Defender in the Cook County Public Defender’s Office. As most of her experience is in criminal law, she has had some domestic relations practice. She lists twenty-seven criminal trials-to-verdict as a lead counsel and twenty as assisting counsel.

Ms. Greer Shambley has been active in several social and legal associations and an executive board member of AFSCME since 2023. She is described as being on top of the law with tremendous legal knowledge, unimpeachable character and highly respected by opposing counsels and judges. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Ashley Greer Shambley qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Qualified

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements

Chicago Federation of Labor
IUOE Local 399
IBEW Local 134
Plumbers Local 130 UA

------------------------------------------------------

Ginger Odom - #144

Candidate Website


Ginger Odom: In her own words

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Pursuant to Section 34 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, the JEC Executive Committee has voted to issue a “Qualified” rating for [Odom's] current Circuit Court Judge candidacy.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Qualified rating. - Ed.)

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Ginger Leigh Odom was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2003. Effective June 23, 2025, she was appointed to fill the vacancy created by the election of Justice Carl A. Walker to the Appellate Court. Prior to the appointment, she had been an Assistant Appellate Defender since 2004 in the Office of the State Appellate Defender’s Office. In 2020 she was named Director of the Expungement Unit and also served on the Illinois Supreme Court’s Commission on Access to Justice.

Judge Odom’s present assignment is in the Traffic Division. The Illinois State Bar Association finds Ginger Odom qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Qualified

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements

Girl, I Guess Progessive Voter Guide
AMVOTE PAC

------------------------------------------------------

Tiffany N. Brooks - #145

Candidate Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:

Tiffany Brooks declined to participate in the Judicial Evaluation Committee (JEC) screening process and, therefore, according to The Chicago Bar Association’s governing resolution for the JEC, is automatically found NOT RECOMMENDED.

The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:

(The Council's list of evaluation narratives does not include a narrative for this candidate, but FWIW can confirm that the Council gave this candidate a Not Recommended rating because this candidate did not participate in the Alliance screening process. - Ed.)

The Illinois State Bar Association says:

Tiffany N. Brooks was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2010. Public records show she is currently the General Counsel for the Clerk of the Circuit Court, a position she has held since December 2020.

Ms. Brooks declined to participate in the judicial evaluation process. Pursuant to ISBA guidelines, Tiffany N. Brooks is not recommended for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Not Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Not Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Not Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Not Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Not Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Endorsement

IUOE Local 150

------------------------------------------------------
Back to "Start here for the most complete information about every 2026 Cook County judicial race"