Friday, October 05, 2007

Immaculate Conception School wins Blue Ribbon Award

Let's take a brief timeout from this blog's recent coverage of judicial candidacies to celebrate an academic achievement:

Immaculate Conception School, on Chicago's Northwest Side, is one of seven schools in the Archdiocese of Chicago to win a Blue Ribbon Award from the U.S. Department of Education. Here is a link to the press release issued by the Archdiocese congratulating all of the winning schools. Of the prize-winning Catholic schools, only Immaculate Conception School is located in the City of Chicago.

The Chicago Sun-Times reports this morning that one Chicago public school also won the award, Horace Greeley Elementary School near Sheridan and Halsted.

The award for Immaculate Conception School is particularly gratifying for me because my wife is a teacher there and each of my five children graduated from that school.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Diana L. Kenworthy claims 10th Subcircuit Democratic endorsement

An email today from Ross Eagle advises that Diana L. Kenworthy has secured the Democratic Party's endorsement for one of the three 10th Subcircuit seats open in the coming primary.

The other two endorsed candidates in the 10th Subcircuit, Eagle advises, are Judge James E. Snyder, appointed by the Supreme Court in March to the fill Kowalski vacancy, and Judge Kenneth Fletcher, who was appointed to the Pucinski vacancy.

But Eagle wanted to call my particular attention to Ms. Kenworthy's slating, and for good reason: He's Kenworthy's campaign treasurer. He's also Kenworthy's law partner -- their firm is Jester, Kenworthy & Eagle LLC -- and he's also her husband.

A lawyer since 1995, Kenworthy started her legal career in the Public Defender's office. She holds undergraduate and law degrees from The Ohio State University. Here's a link to the Kenworthy campaign website; the picture which accompanies this post was obtained at that site.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Seminar provides practical advice for judicial hopefuls

Who's running for judge this year? A lot of men and women who are thinking very seriously about making a run came to Judge Moshe Jacobius' ceremonial courtroom on the 19th floor of the Daley Center last night to hear tips and advice about how to make a successful bid for the bench.

Pictured above are most of the speakers and some of the sponsors of last night's program. From left to right (first row), Kamilah Parker, Assistant State's Attorney Z. Williams (First VP of the Cook County Bar Association), Judge Marjorie C. Laws, Judge Patrick E. McGann, Judge Sandra R. Otaka, Associate Judge Mathias W. Delort, and Judge Sebastian T. Patti; second row, Associate Judge Leonard Murray, Matthew Jannusch of the Lesbian and Gay Bar Association and Carl Turpin (President of the CCBA).

Ms. Williams provided the welcome on behalf of the sponsoring organizations and Judge Murray served as emcee.

Judge McGann led off the evening's speakers with a talk about ethics and a friendly warning: Judicial candidates are subject to discipline for violation of the Cannons of Judicial Ethics (see Illinois Supreme Court Rule 67 and Rule 8.2 of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct). Judge McGann discussed the Supreme Court case of Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002), and what sorts of opinion disclosures may be appropriate for a judicial candidate. I suspect that this will be a topic for future posts as various interest groups send questionnaires to judicial hopefuls.

Judge Delort spoke next about campaign financing -- and how to stay in compliance with the financial disclosure rules of the Illinois State Board of Elections. Full disclosure department: Judge Delort, while in private practice as an elections lawyer, represented me in my judicial campaigns. (My failures at the polls weren't his fault; his job was to help me get on the ballot -- which he did.)

Judge Murray stepped out of his role as emcee next and spoke about nominating petitions and other prerequisites for getting on the ballot. The large audience -- most of whom are circulating petitions right now -- had a great many technical questions for Judge Murray who, like Judge Delort, practiced as an election lawyer before going on the bench.

Judge David Delgado (who is not shown in the accompanying picture) spoke next about the passion that a candidate must have in order to succeed in the election process. "You have to want it," he stressed, repeatedly, "and you have to have a plan." And, he suggested, a candidate must be prepared for "moments of darkness" when things will appear very bleak to a candidate. A candidate must, he said, surround himself with "positive people."

Judge Delgado was elected from Cook County's 6th Subcircuit. Judge Marjorie Laws, who spoke next, was elected from the 2nd Subcircuit.

Judge Laws asserted that an extensive political résumé is not required before becoming a candidate -- she had no substantial political experience, she told the audience, but she sought out, and obtained, political support when she undertook her candidacy. You have to get close to the politicians, she told the group.

Judge Laws suggested that churches are wonderful places to get votes and taverns are good places to obtain petition signatures. With children at home, Judge Laws said, she was initially content to let her husband go to the taverns in the evening looking for signatures -- but he reported back that people wanted to see the candidate: She had to go, too.

One night, Judge Laws told the group, she was in a long, narrow tavern, shaking hands and greeting patrons and following her husband, who was holding the clipboard for signatures. Suddenly he doubled back. "We have to go now," he told his wife, and began leading her from the premises. Judge Laws was surprised; she thought that things were going well.

She asked her husband why they had to leave. "There's a guy in the back," he told her, "who said you sent him to the penitentiary." (Judge Laws had served as a prosecutor before seeking election as a judge.)

Judge Sebastian T. Patti was the only one of last night's speakers who'd been elected countywide. The audience gasped when he revealed how much he raised -- and spent -- in 1996. Campaigns are only more expensive now, he cautioned the audience, and the county has gotten no smaller. He suggested that a candidate would need a driver to maximize the ability to cover events on either side of the county in a single day; valuable time is lost while getting one's car from a parking garage. He suggested that a candidate might want to consider taking a leave of absence from his or her job to make the run; at the very least, he said, a candidate will need to take the last two or three weeks off before the primary.

Judge Sandra R. Otaka was elected from the 9th Subcircuit. She is proud to be the first Asian American elected judge in Cook County and she told the audience how all the politically savvy people told her that this was impossible. (The 9th Subcircuit has traditionally elected Jewish candidates.) Judge Otaka had some very practical, nuts and bolts advice about precinct analysis and organization and how to allocate resources.

The panelists thereafter fielded questions from the audience. Practical advice was dispensed in equal proportion with encouragement. Other organizations sponsoring last night's event were the Asian American Bar Association, Black Women Lawyers' Association of Greater Chicago, the Illinois Judicial Council, and the Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Judge Mulroy sends a little whimsy along Harlem Avenue

I had an email this evening from Judge Thomas R. Mulroy, who is already advertising on Pace buses, trying to call attention to his substantial credentials.

Fat lot of good I've done him so far: I initially mistook his ads for those of another candidate. It's my belief (based on personal experience, not academic study) that ads tend to reinforce or shape impressions already formed. Thus, in seeing an ad on a bus, catching that it was for a judicial candidate, I mistakenly attributed it to someone with a similar name (John Mulroe -- whose campaign treasurer was the first to point out my mistake).

But Judge Mulroy didn't take me to task for my error. Instead, he sent me a picture of one of his ads. Here it is:


And it's clever: "Life's not fair. Elect a judge who is."

Judge Mulroy was also kind enough to send me a link to his website -- where, in addition to the kinds of things you'd hope to find on a judicial candidate's website (the text of his positive rating from the Chicago Bar Association, for example, and a number of blue ribbon endorsements), there were more pictures of his bus ads. So here's another one:


The caption may be a little hard to read at this size (even if you've clicked to enlarge) but it says, "Oh, put a sign on a bus saying you've become a judge..."

I'm certain that Judge Mulroy received this advice, in as many words, from someone. But the point is that these are whimsical ads and I think people will respond favorably to them. It's a good way of livening up the campaign... because judicial campaigns can be... well... rather dry.

Judge Mulroy's email this evening discloses that he will be filing in the 12th Subcircuit. This map may help you get an orientation as to where that is:

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Demetrios G. Kottaras appointed to fill vacancy of Judge Gay-Lloyd Lott

Effective yesterday, September 24, Demetrios G. Kottaras was appointed to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Gay-Lloyd Lott. Mr. Kottaras received his B.S. from Northwestern University in 1979 and his J.D. from Chicago-Kent in 1984. He has served as the Supervisor of the Financial Crimes Unit in the Cook County State's Attorney's Office in Cook County, as an adjunct faculty member at Chicago-Kent, and as a Director of the Hellenic Bar Association.

Department of accuracy, clarification and backtracking

I had a nice email late yesterday from Jeanne Anderson, who identifies herself as a staffer for John Mulroe's judicial campaign, charged, among other things, with managing Mulroe's "online presence."

(Yikes! Staffers! No wonder my own campaigns never went anywhere....)

Ms. Anderson was checking in because of this September 8 post in which I said I saw Mulroe signs on a bus on Harlem Avenue.

No, Ms. Anderson wrote, her candidate does not yet have any signs on buses. "I'm pretty sure I know the ads you're speaking of," she added. "I take Harlem Avenue to and from Loyola Academy several times a week and have frequently found myself behind a #423 Pace bus with a Thomas Mulroy campaign sign on its rear."

I'm sure that must be what I saw.

In my defense I can only say that I was driving kids to school myself and was paying more attention to the direction of the bus than to its advertisements.

(Yes, that sounds weak to me too. It's the best I could come up with.)

Anyway, Thomas R. Mulroy, most recently a partner at McGuire Woods LLP, was appointed to the bench by the Supreme Court in February of this year. Mulroy has also run his own firm and was with Jenner & Block for many years, serving at one point as head of that firm's Intellectual Property Department and finance committee. Mulroy has been an adjunct professor of trial practice at Loyola since 1983 and has taught at both the Northwestern and DePaul Schools of Law.

Stephen Anderson's article for the ISBA about Mulroy's appointment is online here.

So. I'm glad to clear that up.

Please note that the Mulroe campaign has not ruled out advertising on buses. Ms. Anderson is also John Mulroe's campaign treasurer, she says, and she hopes "we soon have the funds to afford that kind of exposure." Toward that end, I notice, there's a fundraiser for the Mulroe campaign Friday, September 28 at Blackthorn Manor, 7280 W. Devon, Chicago, from 6:00 to 9:00pm. You can download an invite by clicking on the Mulroe link at the top of this post.

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Tom Biesty running for judge in 10th Subcircuit

Tom Biesty, a veteran prosecutor who's been associated with the Cook County State's Attorney's cold case unit, and who recently prosecuted Juan Luna for his part in the 1993 Palatine Brown's Chicken massacre, is running for judge in the 10th Subcircuit.

Biesty's wife, Mary, a teacher at Sauganash Elementary School in Chicago, was circulating petitions at Notre Dame High School in Niles this morning. It was a good place to pick up valid signatures: The school was hosting Homecoming for St. Tarcissus Grade School and the stadium was packed -- and, as a bonus, there was a Notre Dame freshman football game before the St. Tars games.

In conversing with Mrs. Biesty, I learned that Judge Dennis J. Morrissey will be stepping aside, leaving a third vacancy in the 10th Subcircuit. Here's a link to the updated vacancy list (as of September 19).

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Judge Maddux suing to void judges' mandatory retirement age

I first saw mention of this story on The Capitol Fax Blog but the full details are to be found at Eric Zorn's blog, Change of Subject. Mr. Zorn (or Professor Zorn, as he is known to readers of Neil Steinberg's columns) also provides a link to a file-stamped copy of Judge Maddux's Complaint. Maddux is represented in this matter by David A. Novoselsky, Benjamin Novoselsky, Leslie J. Rosen, and James J. Ayres of the Novoselsky Law Offices.

A September 12 Law Bulletin story about this suit pointed out that Benjamin Novoselsky (David's father) is 92 -- and only recently retired from the bench. Stephanie Potter's Law Bulletin story quoted David Novoselsky, speaking of his father, "A day before he retired at age 90, he was handling two other judges' calls as well as his own.... He's as active now as he was on the bench."

One suspects that Judge Novoselsky's involvement in this particular suit is not entirely coincidental.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Mandatory reading in this morning's Sun-Times: Abdon Pallasch's article on this year's Cook County Democratic Party slatemaking meeting

A link to Pallasch's article is here.

Do not hold your breath waiting for a similar story from the Tribune.

But it would be nice if both major newspapers in Chicago devoted as many column-inches to the election of judges in Cook County as they do to Hillary Clinton's wardrobe choices or the cost of John Edwards' haircuts.

I will not, however, hold my breath waiting for this to happen.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Twenty five year sentence for possession of drugs legally prescribed? Weird....

A healthy sense of skepticism is required when clicking around on the Internet.

Thus it was with a suspicious eye that I viewed a September 9 story on Chuck Shepherd's News of the Weird which claimed:
Until a July Florida appeals court ruling, Mark O'Hara, 45, had been in prison for two years of a 25-year mandatory-minimum for trafficking in hydrocodone, based solely on the 58 tablets found in his possession in 2004, even though his supply had been lawfully prescribed by a physician. The state attorney in Tampa had pointed out that Florida law did not mention a "prescription" defense to trafficking, and even though O'Hara had lined up a doctor and a pharmacist to testify, the jury wasn't allowed to consider the issue. After the appeals court called the case "absurd" and ordered a new trial with the prescription evidence allowed, the state attorney still refused to drop the case.
Now this seemed a bit far-fetched.

Imagine my surprise then when, checking out the story on Westlaw (subscription required), I found O'Hara v. State, --- So.2d ----, 2007 WL 2042821 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 7/18/07).

Mark O'Hara had 58 Vicodin tablets on him when he was arrested. Vicodin contains some hydrocodone. O'Hara presented evidence that the medication was legally prescribed for "chronic inflammatory joint disease and from injuries he had sustained in an automobile accident." However, his trial attorney apparently failed to preserve the argument that "the evidence established that he possessed the tablets legally." Fortunately for Mr. O'Hara, his trial counsel did "preserve the second issue on appeal by asking the court to instruct the jury that it was not illegal to possess hydrocodone if it had been prescribed." (2007 WL 2042821 at *1.)

Although the Florida court did in fact call the State's construction of the relevant statutes "absurd," it did not laugh the case against O'Hara out of court: The bottom line is that there was an explicit prescription exemption in the possession statute but not in the trafficking statute. Of course, if one is going to sell drugs, whether he acquires his inventory in a street corner transaction or via a seemingly legitimate prescription is really irrelevant, isn't it?

But one ordinarily thinks of a trafficker as one who has a large supply of an illegal drug. The problem was that possession of relatively small amounts of the proscribed (not prescribed, proscribed) substance could alone violate the Florida trafficking statute. The Florida court explained, "Under the statute, when a controlled substance is mixed with another substance in a pill, the weight of the controlled substance is deemed to be the total weight of the mixture, 'including the controlled substance and any other substance in the mixture.'... One prescription Vicodin tablet contains 5 milligrams of hydrocodone and 500 milligrams of acetaminophen, the drug sold under the brand name Tylenol.... For purposes of the trafficking statute, then, each tablet would be deemed to contain 505 milligrams of the controlled substance. Therefore, to exceed the minimum drug trafficking threshold of four grams would require only eight of these tablets." (2007 WL 2042821 at *5.)

And this, in the final analysis, was why there had to be a prescription exception to the trafficking statute, too (2007 WL 2042821 at *5-6):
The dosage recommended by Vicodin's manufacturer is one or two tablets every four to six hours, not to exceed eight per day.... If we were to accept the State's assertion that there is no prescription exception to the offense of drug trafficking by possession, then we would have to conclude that any person who leaves a pharmacy with only one day's worth of properly prescribed Vicodin in hand is guilty of drug trafficking and subject to at least a three-year minimum mandatory prison term and a fine of at least $50,000. One of the doctors who appeared at O'Hara's trial testified that in the course of his practice he had written prescriptions for up to 60 Vicodin tablets. Under the trafficking statute, that many Vicodin tablets would be deemed to contain over 30 grams of hydrocodone. According to the State's reasoning in this case, any patient who had the doctor's prescription filled was subject to a twenty-five year minimum mandatory prison term and a mandatory fine of $500,000....

Standing alone, that proposition is absurd. But it is even more so when considering that the unwitting patient's criminal "culpability" would be less if only his doctor chose to prescribe his pain medication in another, more powerful, form. A Vicoprofen tablet contains 7.5 milligrams of hydrocodone, and its recommended dosage is one tablet every four to six hours to a maximum of five in 24 hours.
Mr. O'Hara's troubles may not be over, however. The Florida court reversed O'Hara's conviction, but remanded for a new trial.

An August 21 article in St. Petersburg Times confirms that the local prosecutor intends to retry O'Hara. Sounds weird to me.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Seminar at Daley Center for judge wannabes September 27

From the September 11, 2007 Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required):
The Cook County Bar Association, Asian American Bar Association, Black Women Lawyers' Association of Greater Chicago, Illinois Judicial Council, Lesbian and Gay Bar Association and Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois are sponsoring a seminar for judicial candidates seeking election in 2008.

"Getting on the Judicial Ballot and Winning" will be held from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. on Sept. 27 in room 1905 of the Daley Center. Registration is not required.

Speakers are Cook County Circuit Judges David Delgado, Marjorie C. Laws, Sandra R. Otaka and Sebastian T. Patti and Associate Judge Mathias William Delort.
Before ascending to the bench, Judge Delort was a specialist in election law.

The Law Bulletin article adds that the program will cover "commonly litigated election law issues, effective countywide judicial campaigns, effective subcircuit judicial campaigns and campaign finance."

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Should have known better....

A per curiam order disposes of a motion to dismiss the appeal in the case of In re American Safety Indemnity Co., --- F.3d ---, 2007 WL 2492815 (2nd Cir. 9/6/07). The appellee argued that the appeal was filed too late. The appellant argued that its attorney called the district judge's chambers and asked which of two possible orders started the clock running for the planned appeal. The appellant claimed that it relied on what the judge's clerk told its attorney.

Quoth the Court of Appeals, dismissing the appeal as untimely: "Litigants should not seek legal advice from judges or judicial staff, and in any case, attorneys should know better than to rely on such advice." (Emphasis supplied.)

Thanks to Chicago attorney Bob Moss who posted this quote yesterday on the ISBA Listserv.

Recidivist of the Month?

This is my nominee for Recidivist of the Month.

Meet Edward Magenheimer, age 70, of Elmsford, New York.

Mr. Magenheimer underwent heart bypass surgery earlier this year. In July, he entered a guilty plea to charges that he bilked three little old ladies out of several thousand dollars. According to a story by Nicole Neroulias of The Journal News, and posted at Lower Hudson Online, it was just last Thursday that Magenheimer was sentenced to a year in the Westchester County Jail on these charges -- and only Monday that he was released "with time served and one-third off for good behavior."

But, according to the policy in Tarrytown, New York, Magenheimer's behavior didn't stay good.

Early yesterday morning, shortly after 6:00 a.m., Magenheimer allegedly happened upon a "1996 white Jaguar that its owner had left parked and running at Spadaccia's Deli on Route 9A in Elmsford." He hopped in and took off toward Tarrytown... where he was nabbed in under 20 minutes.

Maybe he liked prison food.

I first saw the story this morning on Yahoo! News; the image in this post is taken from Lower Hudson Online.

Monday, September 10, 2007

Cook County Democratic Party announces slate of judicial candidates

This table was obtained from "Welcome to the 49th Ward," the website of David Fagus, Democratic Committeeman of Chicago's 49th Ward:

Judicial Office (Name of Vacancy)

Endorsed Candidate

Supreme Court (McMorrow)

Anne Burke

Appellate Court (Burke)

Alan J. Grieman

Appellate Court (Campbell)

John O. Steele

Countywide Circuit Court (Glowacki)

Jesse G. Reyes

Countywide Circuit Court (Montelione)

Thaddeous Wilson

Countywide Circuit Court (Keehan)

Marilyn F. Johnson

Countywide Circuit Court (Murphy)

Paula Lingo

Countywide Circuit Court (Nowicki)

Michael B. Hyman

Countywide Circuit Court (Thomas)

Joan Powell

Countywide Circuit Court (Healy)

Maureen Ward-Kirby

Countywide Circuit Court (Disko)

Lauretta Higgins Wolfson

Countywide Circuit Court (Lott)

Thomas J. Byrne

Countywide Circuit Court – Alternate 1

Stephen J. Connelly

Countywide Circuit Court – Alternate 2

Diann Marsalek

Countywide Circuit Court – Alternate 3

Sandra G. Ramos

Countywide Circuit Court – Alternate 4

Dennis J. Burke

Bench appointment strains relations between Supreme Court and Alliance of Bar Associations

The Illinois Supreme Court recently appointed Furmin D. Sessoms to the 5th Subcircuit vacancy opened by the resignation of Judge Bernetta D. Bush.

Sessoms, according to Sullivan's Judicial Profiles, has an undergraduate degree from the University of California-Berkeley and a law degree from Georgetown. Licensed in Illinois since 1990, Sessoms began his legal career with the Cook County Public Defender's Office. After a seven-year stint in private practice, Sessons rejoined the PD's office, this time as "as chief of the 4th Municipal District Office and, immediately prior to joining the bench, as Deputy Public Defender."

The Cook County Bar Association gave Sessoms its Harold Washington Award for community service in 2001. He's also been active in the National Bar Association, serving on the editorial board of its NBA Magazine. Sessoms has also served as executive director of the Chicago Southside NAACP chapter.

Sessoms' appointment has sparked a controversy.

The Chicago Tribune in a September 2 story by Michael Higgins (with Mickey Ciokajlo) reported that, although Sessoms was found "qualified" for judicial office by the Chicago Bar Association, Sessoms was found "not qualified" or "not recommended" by eight of the ten bar associations that together form the Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening. Only the Cook County Bar Association and the Black Women Lawyers' Association of Greater Chicago recommended Sessoms' appointment.

Like the Chicago Bar Association, the Chicago Council of Lawyers typically releases a brief explanation of its judicial ratings. Of Mr. Sessoms, according to the Tribune article, the Council stated: "Mr. Sessoms has no jury trial or appellate law experience and, despite his many years in the public defender's office, has only tried misdemeanor cases.... While he is to be praised for his community service and commitment to diversity, he has not demonstrated the legal ability or temperament necessary to be a judge." The other Alliance members typically do not release explanations for their ratings, nor did they do so on this occasion.

The Supreme Court requested an explanation anyway. And they didn't get one.

Brian Mackey reported, in the September 4 issue of the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), "the Alliance wrote back, saying the executive board had twice met to discuss the court's request and decided not to provide any additional information." Sessoms had agreed to waive his confidentiality rights, but the Alliance responded, "that release does not cover sources, investigators' reports and the post-interview discussion."

According to Mackey's story, the court's first request for information came in a letter signed by Cynthia Y. Cobbs, director of the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts. But when the Alliance decided not to accommodate the court's request, even after Sessoms waived his confidentiality rights, another letter was sent by the court, this one signed by all three of the Cook County justices, Charles E. Freeman, Thomas R. Fitzgerald and Anne M. Burke.

Mackey's article notes that the court's tone in this second letter was distinctly chilly:
"Your refusal to honor our express request for the same, particularly on the basis cited, [affects] the credibility of the evaluation and, frankly, gives us pause. Even more importantly, however, it renders near impossible Mr. Sessoms ability to mount any credible appeal," the letter states.

The justices also said they "covet zealously" their "independent constitutional authority to act in the absence of bar associations' assistance and, certainly, in spite of their refusals."

The letter uses the past tense throughout, thanking the Alliance for its "past assistance," which the court has "historically... seen fit to invite."
Mackey's article also noted that Justices Burke, Fitzgerald and Freeman all attended Sessoms' swearing-in ceremony. That's an unusual honor -- and as strong a statement, in its way, as anything said in its letter: The Supreme Court will appoint judges that it deems fit.

In a September 4, 2007 post on Illinoize!, Ed Murnane of the Illinois Civil Justice League tries to turn this disagreement among friends into an attempted power grab by "plaintiffs' lawyers, the personal injury trial lawyers who frequently seem to be more interested in the size of the award than in justice."

In the post, Lawyer Groups Throw Weight Around In Judge Selection, Murnane lamented that, in Cook County, "judicial candidates are slated by the Cook County Democratic Central Committee. They may, or may not, have any qualifications beyond the endorsement of a local ward or township committeeman." But, he said, "[p]erhaps more disturbing than the dominant role of political parties in selecting judges is the intimidating influence of the lawyer groups, starting with the Illinois State Bar Association."

What?

Yes, Murnane says, the "ISBA, heavily influenced if not controlled by plaintiffs' attorneys, weighs heavily in the judicial selection and election process.... [The] ISBA has wielded far more influence than the organization deserves and its biases have been obvious." But the appointment of Judge Sessoms is hardly an illustration of the ISBA's 'intimidating' presence in the judicial selection process.

Let's just take a breath here and consider a couple of points.

Historically, although the ISBA evaluated judicial candidates everywhere else in Illinois, it did not attempt to do so in Cook County. The Chicago Bar Association took on evaluation of judicial candidates in Cook County, and devoted (and still devotes) considerable administrative resources and people-power to this process. By 1994, when I first ran for judge, other bar associations, including the Cook County Bar Association and the Women's Bar Association of Illinois had begun their own, independent evaluation processes. But these organizations have fewer members than the CBA and strained under the burden of trying to investigate each of the many candidates who filed for the primary. (Some organizations chose to focus only on certain races so as to not dilute their investigative resources. In 1994, as I recall, the Chicago Council of Lawyers chose not to evaluate candidates for subcircuit positions.)

I have reviewed an appreciation I wrote in 1994 for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin following my own unsuccessful primary run and find that I did not mention the ISBA at all.

It was the increasing number of candidates per vacancy and the budding interest of the ISBA in becoming involved in the evaluation of Cook County judicial races that led to the formation of the Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening. But the Alliance is a relatively new creation.

In addition to the ISBA, CCBA, WBAI, BWLA, and the Chicago Council of Lawyers, other Alliance members are:
I submit that Mr. Murnane misunderstands the role that bar association evaluations play in the judicial election process. They are opinions offered by organizations interested in the improved operation of the court system. Every organization offering an opinion may have a different idea about what improved operations may mean.

Since bar association recommendations are only opinions, informed voters (or in the case of Judge Sessoms, the very informed appointers) are free to consider and disregard them. In this case, the Supreme Court offered the dissenting Alliance members an opportunity to explain why they disagreed with the court's assessment that Judge Sessoms was fit to serve. When the Alliance chose not to respond, the court went ahead with its appointment.

But that does not mean that bar association evaluations are worthless. If anything, the opinions of the CBA and the ISBA and the rest of the Alliance members should be more widely disseminated and more influential: These opinions regarding a candidate's merits (clearly labeled as such) are often the only thing real life primary voters have to go on -- except for the palm card on the way into the polling place. Although a precinct captain may disagree, it takes more than a palm card to make an informed voter.

Saturday, September 08, 2007

Trying to figure out who's running for judge

Prospective candidates for the Circuit Court bench in the February 2008 primary are wondering: Who else is running?

Those who've been appointed to vacancies are presumably all running... but there will be dozens... maybe even a couple of hundred... others who will enter the lists. I've found a few already who've put up websites (one of these, John G. Mulroe, the subject of a September 1 post, is, I saw this week, already running ads on CTA buses).

So some candidates will advertise even before filing for judicial candidates opens. But most will not.

How, then, might a would-be candidate know who else is considering the race?

Well, would-be candidates who hope to raise and spend money on their campaign must file this form with the Illinois State Board of Elections. And when candidates file this form D-1 Statement of Organization, the information becomes available on line.

All the names below come from the "Latest Reports Filed" page on the State Board of Elections website as viewed on September 8, 2007. I deliberately skipped judicial candidates from other counties and I may have missed a Cook County candidate or two, but only because committees aren't required to specify the political office to which the candidate aspires. Many prospective candidates may have already established committees; the link provided here is only to the most recently filed. Also, candidates who have run previously might have kept their original campaign committees active with the State Board of Elections; no new D-1 forms would ordinarily be filed on behalf of such candidates. I've only included persons who have stated, in the title of their committees, that they are seeking judicial office.

A September 7 filing discloses that Gerald Patrick Cleary expects to be a Democratic candidate for Cook County Judge. According to the ARDC, Cleary, a lawyer since 1994, is an attorney with the Northern Trust Bank.

Terry McCarthy, whose campaign website I linked to in my August 28 post, filed his D-1 Statement on September 5.

A D-1 was filed on behalf of appointed Circuit Judge Lauretta Higgins Wolfson on September 4.

On August 31 a D-1 was filed for Nancy Hallihan Horodecki's campaing committee, Citizens for Nancy. According to the ARDC, Ms. Horodecki, who has only been admitted to practice in Illinois since 2004, is employed by the Teamsters.

A D-1 was also filed on behalf of John Garrett Maher on August 31. According to ARDC, Maher has been an attorney since 1993 and is employed as an Assistant State's Attorney.

Of course establishing or maintaining a committee provides no clue about the vacancy or vacancies for which a candidate may file. Nor does establishing or maintaining a committee guarantee that a person will actually become a candidate. But it is one tool which can be employed to get a 'handle' on who else is looking at a run.

From "Bed of Nails Sandwich" to law school student: Sideshow performer makes transition

You can decide for yourself whether one-time Coney Island performer Eduardo Arrocha (who performed under the stage name "Eak the Geek") is making a big transition or a little one.

It depends, I suppose, on how you view law school: If you view it as a "Bed of Nails," maybe the transition isn't too extreme.

That was Arrocha's act in the Coney Island Circus Sideshow (it is the Sideshow website from which the accompanying image is taken).

A September 4 story by Lauren Johnston in Newsday reports that Arrocha has enrolled at the Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Lansing, Michigan.

Even though his father is a corporate lawyer (in Mexico City) and his mother an academic, it is unlikely that Arrocha will pursue a career with a silk-stocking firm.

For one thing, according to Johnston's story, Arrocha is "tattooed from head-to-toe" with "stars and planets inked all over his face." (Your typical big-firm associate is unlikely to have any visible tattoos -- maybe a little tiny AmJur volume on the hip celebrating a class award, but that's about it.) For another, Arrocha's ambition takes him in a different direction: Arrocha told Newsday that he wants to be a "freak lawyer.... I hope to have a little office in New York and work with the alternative people ... all the so-called riff-raff, to give them legal representation that is not judgmental."

But, before Arrocha gets to hang out his shingle, he's had to learn how to tie a tie. There's apparently a dress code at Cooley.

Old Business

White v. Chicago Transit Authority, the subject of the May 23, 2007 post, Reporting about §41 of the Transit Act -- what TV and the courts may have missed, is now reported at 373 Ill.App.3d 507, 869 N.E.2d 287. Timothy M. Gallagher and William E. Hoversen, Jr., represented Geneva White. The CTA was represented in that case by Darka Papushkewych, General Counsel; Ellen L. Partridge, Deputy General Counsel; and Rachel L. Kaplan, Chief Attorney. Gallagher and Hoversen have since advised that a Petition for Leave to Appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court has been filed in this case.

Cordts v. Chicago Tribune, the subject of the December 12, 2006 post, Let's talk about pleadings: Skipping straight to a §2-619 motion may waive a party's right to challenge the sufficiency of a complaint under §2-615, is now reported at 369 Ill.App.3d 601, 860 N.E.2d 444. John F. Winters, Jr. and Ruth M. Degnan of Winters, Enright, Salzetta & O'Brien, L.L.C. represented Michael Cordts. Appellees Chicago Tribune and Medeval Corporation were represented by John W. Powers and Karen M. Osgood of Seyfarth Shaw LLP and J. Laurence Kienlen of the Wheaton firm of Kienlen & Pietsch.

Standard Mutual Ins. Co. v. Marx, the subject of the September 11, 2006 post, Dead storage claim a non-starter in new case -- just like the motorcycle that burned down the storage facility, is now reported at 367 Ill.App.3d 512, 854 N.E.2d 710. John R. Keith, of the Keith Law Office of Springfield, represented Appellant M&S Rentals, Inc. while Robert Marc Chemers and Scott L. Howie of Pretzel & Stouffer, Chtd., represented Appellant Standard Mutual Insurance Company. Mark W. Rigazio of the Rigazio Law Office of Morris, Illinois, represented Appellee John D. Marx.


Pekin Ins. Co. v. Miller, the subject of the September 1, 2006 post, If a tree falls in the insurance policy, will it be covered? is now reported at 367 Ill.App.3d 263, 854 N.E.2d 693. Robert Marc Chemers and Scott L. Howie of Pretzel & Stouffer, Chtd. represented Pekin Insurance Co. Daniel E. Compton, of the Elgin firm of Brittain & Ketcham, P.C. represented the owners of the property on which the trees were wrongfully cut. Clay J. Mitchell, of Wauconda, represented Appellee Ken Miller d/b/a Miller Tree Service.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Hooks, the subject of the July 10, 2006 post, It's all relative in new State Farm household exclusion case, is now reported at 366 Ill.App.3d 819, 853 N.E.2d 1. James M. Harman, of Harman, Fedick & O'Connor, Ltd. represented Sharon Connor Hooks. David E. Neumeister and Jennifer L. Medenwald, of Querrey & Harrow, Ltd. represented State Farm.

Thursday, September 06, 2007

Follow-up on yesterday's post on appointed judges

Instead of spending so much time looking over back issues of the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin and archived Supreme Court press releases in my search for information on appointments to judicial vacancies, I should have looked at the newspaper that was delivered to my office on Tuesday evening.

The September 4 edition of the Law Bulletin carried two stories about three Cook County judicial appointments.

Furmin D. Sessoms was appointed to fill the Fifth Subcircut vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Bernetta D. Bush. This is a link to the Supreme Court's August 30 order making that appointment.

The paper also reported that James A. Shapiro and Thaddeus L. Wilson were both sworn in as new Cook County Circuit Judges on Friday, August 31. Both received appointments that will expire December 1, 2008, the day on which judges elected in the coming election will take their oaths of office. Both men also, according to the Law Bulletin, plan to run in this coming election.

But to which vacancies were these men appointed?

I've looked again at the Supreme Court website and at the Westlaw archives of the Law Bulletin and I can't find the answers to this question.

For a candidate circulating petitions for the coming primary, this is not a matter of idle curiosity: An appointed judge in Cook County will usually (unless slated for a different vacancy by the Democratic Party) seek election for that vacancy. Persons appointed by the Supreme Court -- even if not slated -- can run as incumbents. Their credentials have been vetted by the various bar associations and one or more of the associations has found them qualified or recommended to hold judicial office. (In theory, the Illinois Supreme Court can appoint any lawyer it wants to a vacancy, but in practice every justice has some sort of screening committee. The screening process will include bar association review of a potential appointee.)

On the other hand, a first-time candidate for judge will have to wait until the conclusion of the lengthy investigation process into the qualifications of all candidates in the primary -- a process that will conclude mere weeks before the primary date -- before he or she will know if any bar associations have found their qualifications adequate. For this election cycle, with the early primary date, though the Chicago Bar Association and the Alliance of Bar Associations can be counted on to render yeoman service, the gap between the conclusion of the bar review process and the election may be shorter than ever.

Candidates aspiring to the vacancies filled last week by Messrs. Shapiro and Wilson just suffered a major blow to their hopes.

Formal slating is underway today. It will be interesting to see if the newer appointees have a better claim on slating than those appointed earlier.

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Appointed, yes, but will they be chosen?

Circuit court judges are elected in Illinois, but when vacancies occur the Illinois Supreme Court can fill those vacancies by temporary appointment.

The appointed judge can seek election to a full term at the next election. There was a time when a judge appointed to a Cook County vacancy would have a good chance of being slated by the Democratic party at that next election.

I don't believe that this is the rule any more -- but there is one way to find out: Slating is scheduled for this week. We will soon know who's been slated; we can compare that list with the list of those appointed.

Not all posted vacancies are in fact vacant: Judges can announce they will not seek retention and serve in office until December 1, 2008 when their current term expires. The Supreme Court may choose not to fill some actual vacancies. However, working from Supreme Court press releases and back issues of the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, I have put together this partial list of vacancies which have been filled:

COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT
Countywide Vacancies

Vacancy of the Hon. Michael T. Healy -- Maureen Ward Kirby, appointed 8/22/07

Vacancy of the Hon. Michael R. Keehan -- Marilyn F. Johnson, appointed 3/06

Vacancy of the Hon. Anthony S. Montelione -- Joseph D. Panarese, appointed 8/06 (subsequently accepted appointment as Associate Judge)

Vacancy of the Hon. Michael J. Murphy -- Assoc. Judge Dennis J. Burke, appointed 6/5/07

Vacancy of the Hon. Julia M. Nowicki -- Michael B. Hyman, appointed 6/06

Subcircuit Vacancies

4th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Lon W. Shultz -- William E. Gomolinski, appointed 7/17/07

10th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Robert J. Kowalski -- James E. Snyder, appointed 3/23/07

13th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. James T. Ryan -- Margarita T. Kulys, appointed 7/06

I do not pretend that this is an exhaustive list; it is merely what I can personally verify after searching the referenced sources over several hours this past long weekend. Park Ridge attorney Russ Stewart mentioned in a recent column on his website that the Supreme Court had appointed Kenneth Fletcher to fill the vacancy created by Aurelia Pucinski's move from a 10th Subcircuit seat to a countywide one.

Stewart, himself a former judicial candidate, was not optimistic about Fletcher's or Snyder's chances of being slated. Stewart wrote, "Each Democratic committeeman has a rotating pick. This year, it’s Pat O’Connor’s (40th) and Gene Schulter’s (47th) turn. Fletcher, from the 41st Ward, and Snyder, from the 46th Ward, will both run, but, without party backing, they have no chance."

Sunday, September 02, 2007

Practicing law with a song in your heart?

The ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter this week carries a link to this story by Martha Neil concerning an "unexpected Internet hit -- [a] law firm's unofficial theme song 'Everyone's a Winner at Nixon Peabody!'"

According to Neil's story, Nixon Peabody is a 700-attorney national law firm based in Rochester, New York.

Recently Nixon Peabody was named to Fortune Magazine's 2006 list of the 100 Best Companies to Work For (the link is to CNNMoney.com).

The firm seems to have celebrated its good fortune at some "internal event" at which, according to Neil's story, "law-firm marketers" debuted an unofficial theme song for the firm, "Everyone's a Winner at Nixon Peabody!"

And then some spoilsport went and posted it to YouTube -- and the video took off, getting, Neil says, 10,000 hits in 12 hours. The powers that be at the firm apparently turned as gray as their pinstripe suits and demanded that the song be taken down... a request with which YouTube complied.

However, the Above the Law blawg turned down the request, and seems to gone "wall to wall" covering the story. ABC News has picked up the story as well (including -- if you watch the video -- an interview with the proprietor of Above the Law). Snippets of the song remain available on YouTube as well.

I don't understand Nixon Peabody's fuss. Granted, one would expect a song commissioned by a 'silk-stocking' firm to be performed with a harpsichord, or maybe by a string quartet -- but even a disco-revival song is better than the kind of song that a lot of lawyers seem to have in their hearts as they start each day for work. Most lawyers might not know this particular song, but I've heard a lot of sad anecdotes and I've seen job satisfaction surveys that suggest that a lot of lawyers know the feelings expressed:

You load sixteen tons, what do you get?
Another day older and deeper in debt.
Saint Peter, don't you call me, 'cause I can't go;
I owe my soul to the company store...

(from "Sixteen Tons," by Merle Travis, most famously performed by Tennessee Ernie Ford.)

Just to clarify: I am not running for anything in the upcoming election

I hope to continue writing here about the upcoming judicial primary (in Illinois generally and in Cook County in particular) in the weeks to come, so I suppose I should say, expressly, that I'm not running for any office this year.

This may be particularly necessary since some persons who will come across this site may remember that I have twice run for judge, once in the 10th Judicial Subcircuit of Cook County (in 1994) and then, two years later, for a countywide vacancy. In recounting these adventures, I like to emphasize that I did well with the bar associations (in terms of garnering positive ratings) -- because I certainly didn't do well with the actual voters.

I mention this merely to to explain my interest and to show that I identify with candidates now looking to "get the word out" about their own judicial campaigns.

Saturday, September 01, 2007

John G. Mulroe running for judge in the 10th Subcircuit

Another day, another website. John G. Mulroe is a candidate for judge in Cook County's 10th Judicial Subcircuit.

This is the third link I've run across for a Cook County judicial candidate since I started looking earlier this week.

Mulroe's new site stresses his experience as a hearing officer for the City of Chicago and the Chicago Park District. He also has served as an arbitrator in the Cook County court-annexed mandatory arbitration program. He's also a C.P.A.

A past president of the St. Juliana Parish School Board, according to his site, Mulroe has also served as President of the Edison Park Community Council. He and his wife, Margaret, have four children.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Another Illinois judicial candidate pops up on the Internet

Stuart M. Brody is a candidate for judge in Cook County's 6th Judicial Subcircuit (the Figueroa vacancy). The link will take you to the home page of his new campaign website.

Brody is a partner in the firm of Sneckenberg, Thompson & Brody, LLP; this is a link to his profile on Lawyers.com, the Martindale-Hubbell site.

In the biography on his new site, Brody says his practice is "in civil litigation, having tried over 80 matters, including jury and bench trials, arbitrations, and appeals to the appellate and supreme courts. He has concentrated his practice in insurance law, representing both plaintiffs and defendants in property insurance, auto insurance, fraud investigations, commercial liability, and subrogation lawsuits. He has represented numerous clients in landlord-tenant disputes, contract matters, and business and commercial litigation. In addition, he has fought for individual victims in personal injury claims, medical malpractice, and employment/labor disputes."

I'm sure there will be more websites for judicial candidates in the near future; I'll keep looking. If you know of one, please send me an email or leave a comment.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Are Illinois judicial candidates on the Internet yet?

I was surprised yesterday to find only one site that seems dedicated to a 2008 Cook County judicial candidate. That candidate is Terry MacCarthy. Mr. MacCarthy's site stresses his 17 years' courtroom and trial experience; I assume therefore that "Terry MacCarthy" is Terence Fulton MacCarthy, a member of the Illinois Bar since 1990 and, according to the ARDC, an employee of the Cook County Public Defender's Office.

I find it hard to believe that Mr. MacCarthy has the only site up and running in anticipation of the February 2008 judicial primary -- but it is the only one I have found so far.

Are there others? If you know of one, send me and email or leave a comment.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Illinois judicial candidates get earlier start than ever

A story by Abdon M. Pallasch in this morning's Chicago Sun-Times about the several candidates jockeying for the post of Cook County State's Attorney mentioned that the formal slatemaking meeting of the Cook County Democratic Party will be held on September 6.

Slatemaking is so early this year because the primary election date has been moved up to February 5, 2008. All the other deadlines move up with it.

Petitions are already in circulation for judicial hopefuls. Ward and township committeemen have already heard from lawyers hoping for support. Petitions will be filed in Sprinfield starting October 29, 2007. Here is a link to information provided by the State Board of Elections for judicial candidates.

As of today, August 27, the State Board of Elections shows these judicial offices open in Cook County:

SUPREME COURT
Vacancy of the Hon. Mary Ann G. McMorrow

APPELLATE COURT
Vacancy of the Hon. Anne M. Burke
Vacancy of the Hon. Calvin C. Campbell

COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT
Countywide Vacancies
Vacancy of the Hon. Barbara J. Disko
Vacancy of the Hon. Francis W. Glowacki
Vacancy of the Hon. Michael T. Healy
Vacancy of the Hon. Michael R. Keehan
Vacancy of the Hon. Gay-Lloyd Lott
Vacancy of the Hon. Anthony S. Montelione
Vacancy of the Hon. Michael J. Murphy
Vacancy of the Hon. Julia M. Nowicki
Vacancy of the Hon. Mary Maxwell Thomas

Subcircuit Vacancies
1st Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Edna Turkington

3rd Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. David R. Donnersberger

4th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Lon W. Shultz

5th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Bernetta D. Bush
Additional Judgeship A

6th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Raymond A. Figueroa

7th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Anthony L. Young

8th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Nancy Drew Sheehan

10th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Robert J. Kowalski
Vacancy of the Hon. Aurelia Pucinski

12th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Donald M. Devlin

13th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. James T. Ryan
Vacancy of the Hon. Karen T. Tobin

14th Subcircuit Vacancy of the Hon. Ralph Reyna

15th Subcircuit Additional Judgeship A

(This list does not carry today's date; it indicates that it is current only through August 21.)

Securing the Democratic nomination in a Cook County judicial primary election is (in most cases) tantamount to being elected in November; the Republicans have not even bothered to slate candidates for many countywide Circuit Court vacancies. And there are a couple of Cook County subcircuits where winning the Republican nomination is tantamount to election in November.

Either way -- although the job does not begin until December 1, 2008 -- the identities of the men and women who will take these jobs will be determined on February 5. The time for the public to begin paying attention to next year's judicial elections is now.

Friday, August 24, 2007

Insurer strikes out on Spring Training injury claim

Brendan Regan played baseball for the Fighting Bees of St. Ambrose University of Davenport, Iowa.

In the waning days of Winter and early days of Spring, college baseball teams in the frigid Midwest look for warmer climes in which to play. In March 2002 the St. Ambrose baseball team went to Homestead, Florida to play in the Homestead Classic.

Games were scheduled on March 10, 11, 12, and 14-17 -- but March 13 was an off day. There was no game scheduled. There was no practice.

Taking advantage of the free time, Brendan and a teammate explored the pool at their hotel... and then wandered to the adjacent beach. According to the unanimous opinion written by Justice Margaret O'Mara Frossard in Regan v. Mutual of Omaha, 2007 WL 2350174, "After arriving at the beach, plaintiff ran into the ocean, dove headfirst into a wave, and hit his head on a concealed sandbar. Teammates on the beach pulled plaintiff from the water; as a result of the diving accident, plaintiff sustained a paralyzing spinal cord injury." (Slip op. at 5.)

As a member school of the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA), St. Ambrose was required to be enrolled in the NAIA catastrophic athletic injury program. In 2002 that coverage was provided by Mutual of Ohmaha.

The policy provided coverage for "student athletes in all sanctioned and officially recognized intercollegiate sports" and stated:
Coverage is provided for participation in scheduled games, supervised practice sessions and during authorized group or team travel that is paid for or reimbursed by the sponsoring Organization in connection with such games or practice sessions.
(Slip op. at 2.)

The policy also defined "covered travel" as follows:
'Covered Travel' means team or group travel by participants in a Covered Event:
(a) directly to or from a Covered Event;
(b) authorized and paid for or reimbursed by the Sponsoring Organization; and
(c) supervised by staff members or a designated representative of the Sponsoring Organization.
Covered Travel begins with departing from the meeting place for such travel and ends upon the release of the Insured from the Sponsoring Organization's supervision.
Clearly, Regan wasn't injured in a game or practice nor was he injured going to or from a game or practice -- but, he said, his injury was incurred during team or group travel. The entire trip was supervised by the coaching staff -- and it occurred after departing from Davenport and prior to the team's return.

But Mutual of Omaha contended that, since the injury occurred on an off day, while Regan was swimming on his own personal free time, his activities fell outside the "Covered Activities and Events" described in the policy. The insurer argued that Regan was not supervised when he went to the beach and – since team members and their families contributed to the cost of the trip, the trip was not "paid for or reimbursed" by St. Ambrose.

Both sides moved for summary judgment.

Before filing their cross motions, however, the parties engaged in considerable discovery on the issues of supervision and fund raising. The new Appellate Court opinion discusses the deposition testimony.

Regan testified that he and his teammates were allowed to walk in the area around the hotel, including out onto the beach, without having to report to anybody. Regan said he and his teammates "were basically told that if [they] were going to leave or go somewhere outside of the hotel or after a game, that [they] were supposed to tell the coaches." There were random bed checks during the players' stay at their hotel, "and if they failed to tell coaches where they were going or got caught doing something they were not supposed to do, they would probably not get to play." (Slip op. at 4-5.)

Bees Coach Callahan testified that members of the team were to go everywhere as a group. If a player wanted to go anywhere on his own, he had to have a "buddy"; even with a buddy, players had to first receive permission from one of the coaches before leaving the group.

Callahan also testified that players were prohibited from drinking alcohol within 48 hours before a game (a rule that would encompass the entire trip); they were also prohibited from having overnight guests in their hotel rooms. Room assignments were made by an assistant coach. The players were not permitted to order from room service, and long distance service was not available on room telephones. Bed check was every night at 10 p.m., at which time the players were to be in their rooms with their lights out and "attempting to sleep." (Slip op. at 4.)

"Attempting" to sleep seems about as much as one could hope for: College kids don't normally sleep at 10 p.m. – 10 a.m. perhaps.

According to Coach Callahan's deposition testimony, on the team's day off, Regan and his teammates were "pretty much left to their own devices." Players were "free to pursue individual recreational activities in south Florida with each other, their parents, friends, and girlfriends." (Slip op. at 4.)

Coach Callahan went to get his hair cut on the team's day off; the assistant coach took a side trip to Fort Myers to see the Minnesota Twins' training facility. (Slip op. at 4.)

So the team members weren't being watched on their off day; the coaches weren't even there.

This was what the insurer seized on with regard to the supervision issue: The court's opinion notes that Mutual of Omaha emphasized "Coach Callahan's deposition testimony that there were not any rules or restrictions as to where players could go on the 'off day' and that players were basically free to do whatever they wanted." However the court recognized that the coach "provided this testimony after discussing the rules to which players were subject throughout the trip." (Slip op. at 13.) Regan, the court noted, "was in compliance with those rules at the time of his injury."

But Mutual of Omaha also argued that "St. Ambrose did not pay or reimburse plaintiff for his airfare, lodging, meal, and entertainment expenses" and that, because of this, "the second prong of the definition of covered travel, which requires that the travel be 'paid for or reimbursed by' St. Ambrose, was not satisfied." (Slip op. at 11.)

This contention was supported by some of the deposition testimony: Regan and his teammates had to raise funds to cover this Florida trip. Regan testified that, to raise funds, he and his teammates "sought and received pledges from sponsors based upon the number of miles they ran during conditioning." (Slip op. at 3.) There may be some college baseball programs which do not need player fund raising in order to make Spring Training trips – but one of my sons plays baseball in college and his team needs to raise money for its Spring Training trip, too. And the Bees' fund raising efforts did not make theirs any less a team trip; in a sense, since the players helped raise the money to get them to their destination, it made the entire trip, and not just the games, a true team effort.

Moreover, the Appellate Court noted that "the players did not keep the money necessary to pay for airfare, hotel, and food but, rather, turned that money over to Coach Callahan, who in turn secured group rates for the team at the hotel and the airline. Furthermore, the university paid the entry fee for the tournament and the cost of transporting the players to and from baseball games scheduled during the tournament" as well as the cost of transporting the team to and from Midway Airport in Chicago and to and from the airport in Miami. Under these circumstances, the court found "that there is no genuine issue of material fact that St. Ambrose paid for the team or group travel." (Slip op. at 11.)

But it would not matter that Regan and the rest of the Fighting Bees were under the coaches' supervision, even on their day off, and it would not matter that the team's travel was paid for or reimbursed by St. Ambrose even though the players helped pay their way with fund raising, if Regan was not injured during the course of "authorized group or team travel."

Mutual of Omaha argued that "'covered travel' contemplates a separate coverage evaluation for each segment of team travel and argues that plaintiff's analysis 'unreasonably assumes that Covered Travel must be a single all-encompassing event.'" The insurer argued that, under Regan's construction of the policy, the policy would be 'distorted' into a "24-hour-a-day comprehensive accident medical expense coverage during the entire Florida trip." The insurer suggested that "coverage may extend to certain segments of travel, but not to other segments of
travel, depending upon whether the three prongs of the definition of Covered Travel have been
satisfied for each leg of team travel." (Slip op. at 14.)

But the Appellate Court rejected the contention "that determining what constitutes 'covered travel' requires breaking down the team's trip to Florida into various segments." (Slip op. at 14.) Even though Regan was not "physically moving or being transported directly to or from a game or practice session at the time he was injured," the policy "does not state 'covered travel' means team or group transportation directly to or from a covered event. Rather, that provision defines 'covered travel' in part as team or group travel directly to or from a covered event. As plaintiff points out in his brief, in today's world travel is not simply limited to transportation, but also entails being away from home for a period of time and includes meals and lodging as well activities incident thereto." Staying at the hotel, using the facilities, using the beach – all were "part and parcel" of Regan's 'travel directly to the remainder of the games on the Florida trip and [were] in no way a detour or diversion from his destination - the remaining locations in Florida for the rest of the travel schedule.' Accordingly, we conclude there is no genuine issue of material fact that plaintiff was engaged in team or group travel directly to or from a covered event at the time of his injury." (Slip Op. at 10.)

The Appellate Court affirmed the Cook County Circuit Judge Peter Flynn's decision in Regan's favor: Mutual of Omaha was obliged to provide coverage.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

It may have been HisSpace, but contents of MySpace blog puts part-time Nevada judge on the shelf, off the bench

Many people, in many different walks of life, maintain blogs.

Thus, it will come as no surprise that some judges also blog. The blog maintained by Judge Richard Posner (along with University of Chicago colleague Gary S. Becker), The Becker-Posner Blog, is the only local example that springs immediately to mind, although I am sure there are others.

A part-time Nevada judge, Jonathan MacArthur, was also a blogger, according to an August 14 story by Martha Neil posted on the ABA Journal Law News Now page. He apparently is a blogger still, though his MySpace blog is now private -- but Mr. MacArthur is a judge no longer, as Ms. Neil reports in her story, Temp Judge Fired Over MySpace Post.

Neil writes that MacArthur's blog contained "graphic language" and was "reportedly hostile to prosecutors." (When not serving as a part-time judge, Mr. MacArthur is a criminal defense attorney.)

MacArthur's alleged "hostile" remarks were not quoted in Neil's story for the ABA, but an August 13 story by K.C. Howard in the Las Vegas Review-Journal quoted the "personal interests" professed by Mr. MacArthur in his MySpace blog as including "Breaking my foot off in a prosecutor's ass ... and improving my ability to break my foot off in a prosecutor's ass."

One begins to see why, just possibly, the local prosecutor might have sensed some hostility.

Once he found out about part-time Judge MacArthur's MySpace blog, the local prosecutor, District Attorney David Roger, called it to the attention of the local court administrator. The court administrator, in turn, called it to the attention of North Las Vegas Justice of the Peace Natalie Tyrrell, the full-time judge for whom MacArthur sometimes substituted. They decided that Mr. MacDonald would no longer be employed as a substitute.

The court administrator, Terri March, is quoted in the Journal-Review story as saying MacArthur's remarks were inappropriate and "unbecoming of a pro-tem."

The local authorities seemed to have also taken exception to MacArthur's definition of a judge pro-tem. "Imagine" MacArthur wrote, according to the Journal-Review story, "a substitute teacher with a black choir robe and a disconcerting amount of authority."

MacArthur alleged that his remarks were taken out of context. According to the Journal-Review story, MacArthur claims that "People who know me and interact with me socially know I'm constantly trying to say things in a funny, provocative manner." MacArthur apparently told the ABA's Martha Neil that, in hindsight, he might not have put up his controversial statements, but he only did it with the intent of provoking discussion; he did not intend to be taken at face value. Neil's article quotes MacArthur thusly: "It's obvious to the casual reader this is an overstatement just for the effect."

MacArthur intends to run for his own seat on the bench in 2009. He told the Journal-Review, "My record on the bench is pristine. I've got nothing but compliments from both sides." He also told the Journal-Review that he has no problem fairly applying the law; indeed, he claimed, he makes an "extra effort" to see things from the prosecutor's point of view.

Nevada is clearly very different than Illinois. We don't have "part-time" judges here. And while, from the standpoint of a Chicago native, it comes as no surprise that MacArthur is positioning himself for a judicial election two years distant, the Journal-Review article provides one final surprise.

According to the Las Vegas paper, one Chris Lee, a former deputy district attorney now employed by the Secretary of State, intends to oppose MacArthur for the new seat on the bench.

Only one opponent?

Split 7th Circuit panel upholds Ryan conviction

Here is a link to the 74-page opinion in the case against former Illinois Governor George Ryan.

This is a link to a copy on the Chicago Tribune web site. You can access the opinion on the 7th Circuit web site through this page -- but you have to indicate that the title "contains" the name "Ryan." Every time you do this, however, you'll get a different address for each copy of the opinion opened.

I wonder why this is?

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

News media -- but not new media? Blogger barred from Juvenile Court

Section 1-5(6) of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987, 705 ILCS 405/1-5(6), provides, in pertinent part, "The general public except for the news media and the crime victim... shall be excluded from any hearing and, except for the persons specified in this Section only persons, including representatives of agencies and associations, who in the opinion of the court have a direct interest in the case or in the work of the court shall be admitted to the hearing."

Section 1-8(C) of the Act provides, "Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (C), juvenile court records shall not be made available to the general public but may be inspected by representatives of agencies, associations and news media or other properly interested persons by general or special order of the court."

I looked up these statutes this evening after reading the story of Elaine Hopkins, a 30 year veteran of the Peoria Journal Star, but the proprietor now of her own blog that she calls PeoriaStory.com.

I read the story in the July 30 edition of the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (access limited to subscribers) -- but a Downstate television station, WHOI, has done a story about this as has Rich Miller, of the Capitol Fax Blog. You can read Ms. Hopkins' own account of the story here.

In her own account, Ms. Hopkins links to this online article by Christopher B. Daly, apparently a professor of journalism at Boston University. His bottom line? "Anyone who engages in reporting -- whether for newspapers, magazines, radio, television, or blogs -- deserves equal protection under those laws, whether the news is delivered with a quill pen or a computer."

But in the Law Bulletin article, 10th Judicial Circuit Chief Judge Richard E. Grawey, defended the decision of Associate Judge Albert L. Purham, Jr. to bar Hopkins, stating, "Since any member of the public could become a blogger, I think it gives the potential for exploding the distinction between news media and the public.... There's a potential for every member of the public to become a blogger and making the exception vanish."

Here is a situation where both sides have a valid point: Bloggers can be "serious journalists" -- that is, they can report factually and accurately, quoting real sources and documents -- and they can also write about their cat's dandruff. Sometimes in the same day. But, then, "real" newspapers have news pages... and fluffy features pages too. On the other hand, anyone can start up a blog in about 10 minutes.

Without taking sides in the dispute, I am inclined to sympathize with a judge who has an obligation to keep the proceedings largely confidential... as the statutes set out above require. On the other hand, looking at this particular case, Ms. Hopkins was a veteran reporter and apparently well known in the courthouse. Her publishing her stories in a blog should not, in and of itself, be disqualifying.

In the Law Bulletin article, Judge Grawey is also quoted as saying, "Bloggers don't have editors. They don't have a reputation of a news institution to uphold. There's no fear of losing your job if you're incompetent." Well, Sam Zell is about to complete his purchase of the Chicago Tribune. He'll take the company private in the transaction. Would that mean that he could send a reporter to cover a juvenile proceeding... but would be barred himself?

Fortunately, reporters are not licensed in the United States. On the other hand, could legislation be devised to allow interested persons to register with the court to cover juvenile proceedings -- however they publish their stories? How could such a scheme be worked out without infringing on real press freedom? Would joining the National Writers Union, and obtaining press credentials from the NWU, as Rich Miller suggests, be sufficient? That may be worth watching, as this PeoriaStory unfolds. Meanwhile, the General Assembly is a bit busy with the budget these days... but this may become an issue in a future session....

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Attention Facebook users -- what are you giving away?

I have no Facebook account so I've never read the Facebook Terms of Service (TOS). But I ran across this link from a young lawyer blogger called Legal Andrew who claims to have investigated the Facebook TOS.

Among other things (as you'll see if you follow the link) he charges that using Facebook automatically grants rights to Facebook to use anything you post, any way it wants.

This much I do know: There's no invasion of privacy where there's no privacy at all.

If Mr. Legal Andrew's analysis is flawed or skewed, please advise in the comments below.

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Cell-ular degeneration

Results of yesterday's doubleheader at the Cell:
  1. Twinkies 20, White Sox 14
  2. Twinkies 14, White Sox 0
  3. Bears Training Camp opens July 27


We'll always have 2005... but it looks like it's all we'll have for a little while longer.