Thursday, March 06, 2025

Dr. Klumpp analyzes spending in 2024 Cook County judicial campaigns

FWIW is once again pleased to present a Guest Post by Albert J. Klumpp, a PhD in public policy analysis with a national reputation for expertise on judicial races. Dr. Klumpp is the author of many articles which have appeared in legal publications in Illinois and nationwide. His article, "California's Judicial Retention Elections: Past, Present, and Future," appeared in the December 2024 issue of the Orange County Lawyer Magazine. Dr. Klumpp has been a generous contributor to FWIW for many years.

by Albert J. Klumpp

To finish my work on the 2024 election cycle, here as promised is a look at the campaign spending numbers for all of Cook County’s judicial candidates. Inevitably there will be a few late-arriving bills that have yet to be reported for general election contests, but otherwise the following figures summarize all of the primary and general election spending reported by the 70 individuals who ran for the various judicial vacancies open last year.

Unfortunately the summary figures aren’t entirely comparable with those of past years because of a lack of competition. Of the 45 vacancies open for election, 25 of them were won by a single candidate who faced no opposition in either stage of election. Meaning, more than one-third of the 70 candidates had no one to campaign against. This kept the aggregate numbers lower than they could have been.

Nonetheless, the candidates reported a total of $7,458,054 in campaign spending. The largest contributor to that figure was an infrequent Illinois Supreme Court vacancy, which saw more than $2 million in spending. Here is a table showing the top fifteen spenders:
Obviously the most notable aspect of this table is the massive spending advantage that Joy Cunningham held over her lone opponent, Jesse Reyes, in the Supreme Court contest. When past figures are adjusted for inflation, Cunningham’s total represents the fifth-highest amount spent among the 46 candidates who have sought Supreme Court vacancies in Cook County since 1980. For readers who are curious, here are the top fifteen:
Cunningham’s large financial advantage was undoubtedly a major factor in her success, but as this table demonstrates, money alone is no guarantee of success. Eight of these 15 candidates were unsuccessful, including two of the top three.

Spending for the lower courts was mostly unexceptional. Celia Gamrath’s reported total of $356,556 was the highest amount spent by any of the six Appellate Court candidates, but two of those candidates faced no opposition. And while it ranks as the eighth-highest total among the 203 Appellate Court candidates since 1980, it is well below the biggest spenders.

Similarly, among Circuit Court candidates there were no extreme spenders as there were in the previous three cycles. For countywide vacancies, the biggest spender was Pablo DeCastro, but his reported total of $185,371 ranks only 38th among countywide candidates since 1980 and can be attributed to the unusual situation (in this election cycle) of facing opponents in both the primary and general elections. And the biggest spender among subcircuit candidates (Paul O’Grady, 15th Subcircuit) ranks only 22nd among sub-county candidates since 1980. (O'Grady was defeated by Luciano Panici, who spent nearly as much.)

But despite the lack of extreme spenders in this cycle, and despite the lesser competitiveness, the aggregate numbers did nothing to change the trend in campaign spending that I have noted in the past, both here in FWIW and in published work. The chart below reports median spending numbers, adjusted for inflation, on a decade-by-decade basis:
The chart shows that spending per candidate has grown steadily since the 1990s despite a gradual decrease in the number of candidates per contest. In fact, it may be that the increase in spending is increasingly discouraging potential candidates. This is a question that I hope to answer in my current research project.

In the meantime, and to conclude, the usual fine print: The amounts reported here come from reviewing every quarterly campaign finance report filed with the Illinois State Board of Elections by every candidate. They include items reported as in-kind contributions, and exclude items that are not directly relevant to the vote-getting objective of the campaign (for instance, loan repayments that are technically required to be reported as expenditures). All pre-2024 totals were adjusted for inflation using basic Consumer Price Index data.

Wednesday, March 05, 2025

You too can be a judge!

At least for a day... or a couple of hours, anyway.

Yes, this is an example of a clickbait headline... and I apologize for stooping so low... but the American Bar Association Law Student Division National Advocacy Competition (NAAC) Committee is trying to recruit volunteers to judge the 2024-2025 NAAC National Finals, to be held April 3 and 4 at the Dirksen Federal Courthouse.

The ABA is touting this as an opportunity to serve as a Supreme Court Justice without the torture and madness of Senate confirmation hearings. Also without the salary, benefits, or pension, but, hey, nothing in this world is perfect....

There's even a possibility of CLE credit, although the ABA's promotional materials make no promises.

Interested persons can sign up for one, two, or more rounds. Persons can even sign up as groups (although I am sure the organizers will try to accommodate, I wouldn't hold them to keeping your group together). The rounds, which include an hour for judge orientation, are as follows:
  • Round 1 - Thursday, April 3 - 8:30 a.m. to 12:45 p.m.
  • Round 2 - Thursday, April 3 - 1:00 to 5:15 p.m.
  • Octofinal Round - Friday, April 4 - 8:00 to 10:30 a.m.
  • Quarterfinal Round - Friday, April 4 - 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
  • Semifinal Round - Friday, April 4 - 2:00 to 4:30 p.m.
(Before this post, I believe I would have challenged the word "octofinal" if it were used in Scrabble.)

I've given you the volunteer link, above. It is in the preceding sentence as well. Questions regarding the event can be directed to Erica M. Zepeda, the Law Student Division Program Manager for Early Career Strategy at competitions@americanbar.org.

Who Sits Where: Ash Wednesday edition

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa... appropriate words to recall at the start of this penitential season of Lent... and also a phrase that I have to utter pretty much every day. Often more than once a day. For various reasons.

But... with input from the Supreme Court and the Illinois State Board of Elections... I think I can finally (third time's the charm) present an accurate list of current Cook County judicial vacancies... until it changes, of course.

Which it will.

That much, I can promise.

Just one other note: The Supreme Court website does have a vacancy list now posted on its website. Here's the link. (The Supreme Court webpage also shows Downstate vacancies, for those inclined to look.)

Any and all remaining errors of omission or commission in the following list are mine alone. But I think we're in good shape now. For the moment....

Countywide Circuit Court Vacancies

Vacancy of the Hon. Cynthia Y. Cobbs -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Mary Ellen Coghlan -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. William H. Hooks -- Linda Sackey
Vacancy of the Hon. Paul Karkula -- D'Anthony (Tony) Thedford

Subcircuit Vacancies

1st Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Robert Balanoff -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Carl A. Walker -- Unfilled

3rd Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Thomas W. Murphy -- Unfilled

8th Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Celia L. Gamrath -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Mary L. Mikva -- Unfilled

11th Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Pamela McLean Meyerson -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Mary Colleen Roberts -- Kim Przekota

13th Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Martin C. Kelley -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Shannon P. O'Malley -- Unfilled

16th Subcircuit
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Patricia Mendoza -- Unfilled
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Callie L. Baird -- Unfilled

17th Subcircuit
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Lloyd J. Brooks -- Unfilled
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. James R. Carroll -- Unfilled

18th Subcircuit
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Frank J. Andreou -- Unfilled
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Jeffrey G. Chrones -- Unfilled

19th Subcircuit
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. John A. Fairman -- Unfilled
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Michael J. Kane -- Unfilled

20th Subcircuit
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. David E. Haracz -- Michael Zink
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Stephanie K. Miller -- Unfilled

Tuesday, March 04, 2025

IBF's Lawyers Rock fundraiser set for Thursday, March 13

Far be it from me to contradict the Illinois Bar Foundation; I am just wary of overly broad generalizations. Call it a sort of lawyerly caution. While I am happy to accept the idea that, in general, lawyers rock -- I have also noted, from time to time, that some lawyers have rocks in their heads. Which is not the same thing.

Either way, the IBF is hosting its annual Lawyers Rock concert and fundraiser on Thursday, March 13, at the Bottom Lounge, 1375 W. Lake.

Doors open a 5:30 p.m.; the music starts at 6:00. The Bisceglia Brothers will open the show. Also scheduled to appear are the following bands:
  • The Motions,
  • The Thornes, and
  • Coyote Heavy (making their Lawyers Rock debut).
Pete Hoste of Leahy Hoste Alkaraki will serve as MC.

General admission tickets are $75 each (includes food, complimentary valet parking, and two beverage tickets); VIP tickets are $100 (includes food, complimentary valet parking and open bar). Reduced price tickets are available for YLD members and law students. To buy any of these tickets, start on this page of the IBF website.

And, of course, sponsorships are available. Scroll down on this page of the IBF website for details.

Additional vacancies not listed in yesterday's "Who Sits Where"

I told you that yesterday's list was likely incomplete. Sure enough, before last night was over, an anonymous FWIW reader tipped me off as to a number of additional vacancies.

The information provided has the semblance of truth, but I can't vouch for the information at this point, not without confirmation. I don't have the reputational capital to spare. On the other hand, because this appears legit, I believe this is appropriate to share, subject to the foregoing caveat.

Basically, three of these five additional vacancies arise because of the election of several associate judges to full circuit judgeships in November. And, remember, the first 10 vacancies occurring in the ranks of the associate judges are parceled out to the new subcircuits (Nos. 16-20).

I listed two 16th and 20th Subcircuit vacancies yesterday, and one in the 19th. But my informant adds two 17th and 18th Subcircuit vacancies, and another in the 19th, to wit:
  • 17th - Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Lloyd J. Brooks,
  • 17th - Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. James R. Carroll,

  • 18th - Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Jeffrey G. Chrones,
  • 18th - Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Frank J. Andreou, and

  • 19th - Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Michael J. Kane.
Judge Carroll retired last October; Judge Kane retired last February. I knew about Judge Carroll's retirement, but I did not know about the disposition of his vacancy. I did not know about Judge Kane's retirement.

Judges Brooks, Chrones, and Andreou all were associate judges who were elected to subcircuit seats in November. Andreou was elected from the 12th Subcircuit, but (and there's a sort of symmetry here) Brooks was elected from the 17th Subcircuit (he was appointed to the seat before Election Day), while Chrones was elected in the 18th Subcircuit.

Now, of course, I'm not trying to push anyone out the door, especially when they just got their seats, but if my informant is correct, voters in the 17th Subcircuit would get to fill a Brooks vacancy in 2026... and again at some point in the future. Similarly, voters in the 18th Subcircuit would get to fill a Chrones vacancy in 2026 and whenever Judge Chrones decides to call it a career.

We didn't get that sort of thing when the original subcircuits were put in place... just "A" and "B" and "C" vacancies and the like.

Anyway, I will seek official confirmation of these additional vacancies and update the "Who Sits Where" in due course as appropriate.

Monday, March 03, 2025

Who Sits Where: Pulaski Day edition

Yes, it's Pulaski Day -- far too early to be talking about the 2026 election. Don't blame me, however. I don't determine the election cycle, I just write about one small corner of it. Lobby your elected representatives instead. Tell them August would be a much better time than March in which to hold a primary: By August 2026 John Q. and Mary Sue Public will be starting to think in earnest about the elections in November and more willing to inform themselves about the issues of the day. They would be far more willing to come out and vote to select candidates worthy of public support in an August primary. If your elected officials could respond honestly, they might say something like this: Duh. That's why we hold the primary in March, before anyone has a clue what we're up to.

Then the asteroid would hit....

But don't worry; were you fool enough to make such a suggestion, your elected representatives would ignore you and/or agree that yours is a marvelous idea, that they've always supported, but that they haven't been able to move the idea forward in Springfield. And, if you want to be a judge, don't put your elected officials on the spot like this; it won't help at slating time.

If you don't want to be a judge, or if you couldn't get slated with a million dollars of readily disposable income, please also lobby your elected officials support legislation to make the judicial primaries non-partisan.

It astounds anyone not from Chicago (and also anyone possessing at least three functioning brain cells) that we elect our mayor and our alderpersons in a "non-partisan" primary, but we make persons running to be professional neutrals -- you know, judges? -- run in partisan primaries (and, in Cook County, as a practical matter, only in the Democratic primary). But -- sputters the out-of-towner -- that effectively disenfranchises Republicans or independents unwilling to vote in a partisan primary! And the politicians would stare blankly in response, thinking, but never actually vocalizing, Duh. That's why we do it this way.

But, again, don't blame me. This is not my system. I'm just offering navigation aids here for those looking to set sail on a sea of political insanity.

What follows is a list of known judicial vacancies that will be on the 2026 ballot. This list is entirely unofficial, and almost certainly incomplete. I've indicated those vacancies filled by temporary appointment or where an appointment process has been announced. There will be more vacancies and more appointments both.

Any and all errors of omission or commission in the following list are mine alone and I will be grateful for additions and corrections provided. This list will likely be updated several times in the coming months.

Countywide Circuit Court Vacancies

Vacancy of the Hon. Cynthia Y. Cobbs -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Mary Ellen Coghlan -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. William H. Hooks -- Linda Sackey
Vacancy of the Hon. Paul Karkula -- D'Anthony (Tony) Thedford

Subcircuit Vacancies

1st Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Robert Balanoff -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Carl A. Walker -- Unfilled

3rd Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Thomas W. Murphy -- Unfilled

8th Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Celia L. Gamrath -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Mary L. Mikva -- Unfilled

11th Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Pamela McLean Meyerson -- Unfilled
Vacancy of the Hon. Mary Colleen Roberts -- Kim Przekota

13th Subcircuit
Vacancy of the Hon. Shannon P. O'Malley -- Unfilled

16th Subcircuit
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Patricia Mendoza -- Unfilled
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Callie L. Baird -- Unfilled

19th Subcircuit
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. John A. Fairman -- Unfilled

20th Subcircuit
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. David E. Haracz -- Michael Zink
Converted from the Vacancy of the Hon. Stephanie K. Miller -- Unfilled

Friday, February 21, 2025

Go jump in the lake... for a good cause

The Diversity Scholarship Foundation will participate in the 25th Annual Polar Plunge in support of the Special Olympics on March 2, 2025. That means that DSF members are looking to recruit people... you, perhaps... to jump into Lake Michigan on the first Sunday in March.

The Weather Channel currently predicts that the high temperature in Chicago will reach 30 degrees on March 2 (I looked it up). The normal high for March 2, according to the National Weather Service is 41 degrees. It's not good beach weather either way.

But it is for a good cause: All of the proceeds raised through through the DSF team page will go directly to the Special Olympics. The DSF will have a tent for attendees, with food donated by the World-Famous Billy Goat Tavern, and refreshments.

The DSF is asking individuals who are actually going to plunge to donate a minimum of $200. (If this is out of reach, DSF says any amount will be welcome). The DSF is inviting everyone to participate — no need to be a bar president or even an attorney — and persons are welcome to attend without plunging.

Or, of course, you could just make a donation by clicking on the DSF team page from the comfort and privacy (and warmth) of your home or office and not risk pneumonia. But you would thereby forego a potentially helpful, if frigid, networking opportunity. The choice is yours....

CBA Symphony Orchestra & Chorus in concert on Saturday March 1

The Chicago Bar Association Symphony Orchestra & Chorus will perform in concert on Saturday, March 1, at 7:30 p.m., at St. James Cathedral, 65 E. Huron.

The program will feature the American premiere of Johann Friedrich Fasch's Magnificat in G major... just about 300 years after it was written. Of course, it was not possible to 'drop' new music on YouTube in 1724....

The program will also feature choral works by Thompson, Toch, and Gilbert & Sullivan. Stephen Blackwelder will conduct; Jeremy Vigil will be featured on the piano.

The orchestral portion of the concert, under the baton of CBASO Music Director Jennifer Huang, will feature Beethoven's Leonora Overture No. 3, Weber's Der Freischütz Overture, Saint-Saëns' Danse Macabre, and Smetana's The Moldau.

Advance tickets are available at this Eventbrite link. Adult tickets are $15 each, if sold in advance; law students and persons under 18 can obtain tickets for $10.

Tickets will also be available at the door (and online ticket sales will cease on the day of the event). Adult tickets will be $20 at the door, $15 for law students or persons under 18.

Thursday, February 20, 2025

CBA announces this year's Dickerson honorees; awards luncheon set for February 27

The Chicago Bar Association has announced the names of six indivduals who will receive the Earl Dickerson Award this year at a luncheon at the Union League Club on February 27. This year's honorees are:
  • Ronald Austin, Jr., Principal, Grant Austin LLC,
  • Hon. Fredrick H. Bates, Circuit Court of Cook County,
  • Margaret Mendenhall Casey, Deputy Corporation Counsel, City of Chicago’s Office of Corporation Counsel,
  • Hon. John A. Fairman, Circuit Court of Cook County,
  • Hon. Judith C. Rice, Presiding Judge, Domestic Violence Division, Circuit Court of Cook County, and
  • Ami N. Wynne, Partner, Morgan Lewis
The CBA established this award in honor of the late Earl B. Dickerson who was an outstanding lawyer and among the first African-American members of The CBA. The CBA remembers Dickerson's life and professional career as having been devoted to the law and helping others gain equality and justice. With its Dickerson Awards, the CBA recognizes and honors minority lawyers and judges whose careers at the bar emulate Dickerson's courage and dedication in making the law the key to justice for all in our society. A complete list of all prior winners of the Dickerson award can be obtained from the CBA's Dickerson Awards web page.

Tickets for the awards luncheon are $75 apiece; tables of 10 are available for $750. Tickets can be obtained at this page of the CBA website. Interested persons can purchase ads in a commemorative ad book. A full-page ad (4.5" wide x 7.5" high) is $500. Questions about the ad book, or any other questions about the event, should be directed to Michele Spodarek.

Judge Andrea M. Buford appointed Acting Presiding Judge of the Child Protection Division

Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans has appointed Judge Andrea M. Buford as Acting Presiding Judge of the Child Protection Division.

Buford replaces Judge Robert Balanoff in this role; Balanoff retired from the bench at the end of January.

In a press release issued in conjunction with the announcement of the appointment, Judge Evans said, "Judge Buford has a great deal of experience in this highly sensitive and vital division of the Cook County Circuit Court. She is known for her compassion, knowledge and hard work, and I am sure she will do an excellent job in her new position."

A lifelong Chicago resident, Judge Buford was appointed to the bench by the Illinois Supreme Court in April 2013. She was elected to that same countywide vacancy in 2014 and was retained in 2020.

Judge Buford has also served as the Chair of the Special Supreme Court Committee on Juvenile Courts and currently sits on the Supreme Court Committee on Equality, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Responsibility, and the Illinois Judicial College Committee on Guardians Ad Litem. She was recently invited to join the judicial subcommittee on the implementation of The Safe Model, a collaboration between the Department of Children and Family Services and the Administrative Office of Illinois Courts, to change the trajectory of cases and allow children to be returned home sooner with supportive services in place.

Before her elevation to the bench, Judge Buford focused her practice primarily on civil defense litigation, representing corporations and municipalities. She has served as president of the Cook County Bar Association, president of the Cook County Bar Association Foundation, President of the Illinois Judicial Council, and as Economic Development Chair for the NAACP. The recipient of numerous awards, Judge Buford was named one of the most influential Chicagoans by N’DIGO Magazine. She also served as a Commissioner on the Illinois Court of Claims, and as a Hearing Officer for the State Board of Education, the Illinois Department of Human Services and the Illinois State Board of Education. She was appointed Federal Foreclosure Commissioner, a Special Assistant Attorney General and a Special Assistant Corporation Counsel.

In that same press release, Judge Buford said she is grateful to Judge Evans for the new appointment: "I am honored that he has entrusted me with this most important assignment. Our Division is in a position to help our most vulnerable children and families. We have a chance to influence their future choices. I’m also inheriting a division of extremely competent and compassionate judges who understand the gravity of our position."

Judge Buford's predecessor as Presiding Judge, Judge Balanoff, had served as a circuit judge since 2004 (when he was elected to a 1st Subcircuit vacancy), and led the Child Protection Division since December of 2020.

"We will miss Judge Balanoff's tremendous experience as a judge in the Circuit Court of Cook County. He has been a wonderful colleague and friend. I wish him all the best in his next chapter," said Judge Evans.

Illinois Bar Foundation Gala set for Friday, October 17

October 17 is a long way off, but the Illinois Bar Foundation is already asking you to save the date for its 26th Annual Gala, honoring Mt. Vernon attorney Mark D. Hassakis of Hassakis & Hassakis P.C.

The Gala will be held at Chicago's Four Seasons Hotel, 120 E. Delaware, starting at 6:00 p.m. The Gala is one of the pricier events on the social calendar, with individual tickets going for $500 each (judges and employees of non-profits can buy discounted tickets for $400 each). VIP tickets are available for $1,000 each -- and there are sponsorship opportunities aplenty, up to and including a non-exclusive $50,000 Gala Cornerstone Sponsorship. Tickets and sponsorships may be obtained from this link.

The Gala's honoree, Mark D. Hassakis, is a Past President and longtime booster of both the Illinois State Bar Association and the Illinois Bar Foundation. Sponsors assert that Hassakis may well hold the record for bringing the greatest number of new leaders into the IBF family. Keeping with that theme, sponsors say that this year’s Gala will celebrate the history of the IBF as well as the spirit of connection and friendship that brings the IBF community together each year.

UPDATING: Deadline for the CBA's Flash Fiction contest extended to March 3

Updated after publication to include extended entry deadline
Members of the CBA, including law students (but excluding CBA board and officers, CBA staff and CBA Record Editorial Board members) are invited to submit short stories (up to 1200 words) by Monday, March 3, for the CBA Record's 2025 Flash Fiction Contest.

Topics do not need to be related to the legal field but must be original works, rated PG, and previously unpublished. Use of ChatGPT or similar AI prohibited. The CBA will retain nonexclusive rights to all materials published by the CBA. The winning entry will be published in the CBA Record and the winning author will receive a $100 Amazon gift card. Second and third place winners will have their work published on the CBA's website.

Submissions will be judged by the members of the CBA Record Board of Editors, last year's flash fiction first-place award winner, and a celebrity judge (yet to be revealed).

Entries should be sent to CBARecord@chicagobar.org. No person may submit more than two entries. Further information may be found at this page of the CBA website.

Friday, February 07, 2025

Cook County Democratic Party skipping ahead to 2026, too

Remember how I told you that the bar associations were essentially skipping 2025 and plunging straight into 2026? First, the Alliance and then the CBA announced efforts to beef up their respective judicial evaluation committees.

They're looking for evaluators now because 2026 judicial candidates will shortly be popping up, like dandelions in the early spring.

The candidates will be surfacing earlier than ever this year because of our insane primary system.

Persons who are now thinking of running for judge are running for a job whose starting date is the first Monday in December 2026. For those of you who don't wish to take off your shoes to calculate, that's 668 days from today. Essentially one year... on Mars. That vast length of time still may be difficult to comprehend. Let's try it this way: At the next status hearing on your Law Division case, tell the honorable motion judge that you want 668 days to get your depositions done. Then duck. Not a civil attorney? How about this: April 11, 2023 was 668 days ago. How much water has gone under the bridge since then for you, Dear Reader?

Normal people, in the real world, don't usually deal with timescales like this when dealing with potential employment. You, Dear Reader, may have sought work previously. At least I don't think FWIW attracts many readers who are still living with Mom and Dad. When seeking employment, you have looked at positions currently open, or coming open soon. Where a job is made available, you have presumably sought the earliest possible start date, allowing only for a courteous transition from your current situation (the proverbial two weeks' notice, typically, with adjustments appropriate to the circumstances).
For those serious about running in the next election cycle, your part is not to question the rationality of our system (that way lies madness); rather, your part is to figure out how to survive in the real world, and remain employed, while pursuing this chimera. You have to pretend, for one thing, that the election calendar makes sense, though it doesn't, because you must master it.

Remember: Assuming that this election is consistent with our recent elections, the identities of those persons who will get to be judges 668 days hence will be determined in 403 days, on March 17, 2026. To get on the ballot -- to have a chance to run in the Democratic primary -- you will have to start circulating petitions in August of this year -- only six months down the road.

Makes it a bit more immediate, don't it? (Even if it doesn't make it one iota less insane....)

The Cook County Democratic Party lives with this calendar. With everything moved up a month or so for the 2026 campaign season, slating may be in June this year... in four months or so... pre-slating may be in April... perhaps no more than 60 days hence.

Which brings us back to the March 29 Road to the Robe presentation. No speakers have been announced for this event, but, in the past, the persons who have presented were truly well-versed in Cook County election law and procedure. Anyone thinking of running in 2026 would do well to consider attending this event. The information you need to register is on the graphic above.

But... remember this: The Cook County Democratic Party is not just putting on an educational event; it is actively shopping for candidates. This is one way of finding out who is running... and who the Party may be interested in backing.

Friday, January 31, 2025

In response to a reader's question: No, the primary is not moving in 2026 -- but filing deadlines will come sooner in 2025

A reader asked me to look into a rumor that legislation had passed in Springfield to move the 2026 primary "up" -- that it would be held sooner than has been customary -- and that, as a consequence, candidate filing might begin as early as August of this year.

Readers may remember that Illinois has fiddled with the primary dates before. It was moved back to Mel Brooks' birthday (June 28) in 2022 (a Covid consequence). In 2008, the primary was held on February 5. This was done to improve the presidential chances of a certain Illinois senator; a big win in his home state helped Barack Obama on the road to the White House. The early date was retained for 2010, when the primary was held on Groundhog's Day, but the primary was returned to mid-March in 2012.

So it was not out of the question that something had been rammed through Sprinfield in the dead of night. That's when they generally do things there, or at least, that's generally when they do anything they think to be important.

And we just started a new General Assembly this month... meaning there was an opportunity for last-minute shenanigans in the dying moments of the expiring one. Which, no doubt, there were -- but not with the election calendar.

The 2026 primary will be held on the Feast of St. Patrick itself. (Insert your own questions here about how, if the primary is held on March 17, snakes can still get on the ballot.)

However there was some tinkering done with the election calendar in Springfield last year and this does impact Cook County judicial hopefuls.

Pursuant to P.A. 103-0586, which amends, inter alia, Section 7-12(1) of the Election Code, 10 ILCS 5/7-12(1), petition filing will open Monday, October 27, 2005 and close on Monday, November 3. The special judicial filing period (for vacancies occurring in the three weeks prior to November 3) will begin on Monday, November 17 and end on Monday, November 24. And petition circulation, which under Section 7-10 of the Election Code, 10 ILCS 5/7-10, can not begin until August 5, that being the 90th day "preceding the last day provided in Section 7-12 for the filing of such petition."

Basically, the primary election stays put... but the election calendar gets moved up by 28 days.

That means challenges will come sooner, and be resolved sooner, and won't necessarily collide with Christmas, and judicial review of electoral board decisions may actually be concluded before the start of early voting.

FWIW readers will remember the mischief that followed in the last election cycle, when people were already voting, or trying to, and the courts were still grappling with a couple of cases.

Now, none of the dates here should be accepted by you as set in stone -- other than the March 17 primary date. I have counted backwards from that date as the language of the Election Code commands, and have done the best I can, but the dates set out here are unofficial.

As for the statute itself, it did pass in an eyeblink, roughtly 48 hours after a second "amendment" was made to a bill originally purporting to amend the Children and Family Services Act. SB2412 did not become a shell bill until it arrived in the Illinois House. And then it aged in the House for a while, 11 months or so, like stinky cheese. I wrote about the bill at the time of its passage, even noting the potentially beneficial impact of this legislation on our congested election calendar. But, when the reader's inquiry came in, I did not immediately remember the new statute, or the prior article. I apologize for this lapse.

Thursday, January 30, 2025

Chicago Bar Association recruiting new JEC members


The Chicago Bar Association is actively recruiting new members for its Judicial Evaluation Committee. And the CBA is making a full-on, multi-media effort in support of this recruitment drive. That's a full half-hour video, above, profiling the CBA JEC, and explaining how the JEC helps to foster judicial competence and independence. And, below? This is a clip from CBA JEC Chair Michelle Carey, explaining how she got involved in the JEC and how she believes it is helping her career:


I suppose the shorter clip is for the Millennials or Zoomers who prefer to consume information in Reel- or TikTok-sized bites.

(Or would that be "bytes"? Less accurate, surely, but it looks more technical....)

Anyway, CBA members of every generational cohort can download the application to join the CBA JEC from the CBA website.

Questions about CBA JEC service should be directed to Phyllis Lubinski at plubinski@chicagobar.org.

Przekota appointed to 11th Subcircuit vacancy


The Illinois Supreme Court, on the recommendation of Chief Justice Mary Jane Theis, has appointed Cook County Assistant State's Attorney Kimberly Przekota to the Roberts vacancy in the 11th Subcircuit.

The appointment is effective February 20 and will terminate on December 7, 2026. The Supreme Court's press release concerning the appointment may be found here.

In the 2024 election cycle, Przekota was a candidate for an 11th Subcircuit vacancy, in what proved to be the closest judical race in the county.

According to ARDC, Przekota has been licensed as an attorney in Illinois since 2008. Her appointment was pursuant to a process announced by Chief Justice Theis last December.

Thursday, January 16, 2025

Cook County Judicial wannabes: It's already 2026

Happy New Year! Gosh, 2025 was short, wasn't it?

Alright, actually, the calendar still says 2025 and you haven't done a Rip Van Winkle. But if you are thinking about running for judge in Cook County in 2026 -- and I know many FWIW readers are thinking quite a bit about that -- the Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening wants you to be thinking also about getting your evaluations in order for the forthcoming election cycle.

Specifically: Members of the Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening will begin accepting completed questionnaires, effective immediately, from candidates who will be seeking vacancies (actual or potential) in the 2026 Cook County primary election. If you are thinking instead about filing for associate judge, this would be a good opportunity for you to submit your credentials as well.

Joyce Williams, the Alliance Administrator, told FWIW in a statement, "We are hoping to evaluate as many individuals as possible at this time to ensure potential candidates will be able to better utilize their ratings."

You may request the Alliance’s questionnaire via the following:
(The links will take you to the ISBA website. The questionnaires will be provided when you have completed the proper form.)

And for those of you who are not thinking about running for judge in 2026, please consider volunteering for the Judicial Evaluation Committees of any Alliance group you may belong to. In fact, consider joining one or more Alliance groups that you haven't already joined and then volunteer for JEC service.

You don't want to volunteer for JEC service if you may run for a vacancy in 2026, because the Alliance groups (and the Chicago Bar Association, for that matter) will automatically give a negative rating to any JEC member who runs. On the other hand, if you are thinking in terms of 2028 or 2030 or beyond, JEC service now will only help prepare you for your own eventual run. If you browse through the archives here, you will see that a great many of our sitting judges today had JEC service, sometimes quite extensive JEC service, in their backgrounds.

Different Alliance groups have differing procedures about how to join their JECs, so visit the website of the Alliance groups for which you wish to volunteer.

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

By now you've read or heard about the latest judicial suspension...

So I will not pile on.

If you aren't familiar with the case, Maya Dukmasova's article for Injustice Watch or Tim Hecke's article for CWBChicago will tell you everything you need to know about what got the judge into trouble. The order reassigning the judge in question may be found here.

I could not find a link to the statement issued by the Cook County Bar Association about the matter, but someone sent me an image:
The Chicago Bar Association also issued a statement. I won't embed the Tweet (I've seen these called Xeets recently, but that just bothers me), but here's the link if you want to read it.

I'm not here to defend the judge, or excuse her for sending the image.

I don't know the judge. I have no way of knowing what kind of a person she is. I have no magic x-ray machine with which to ascertain a person's innermost motivations or beliefs. I wish I did. With a machine like that I'd feel much better about hiring a contractor to remodel my kitchen. I cautiously observe -- generally, and not specifically commenting on the current controversy in any way -- that it would presumably be very difficult for an unreconstructed racist to work successfully as a Cook County Assistant Public Defender for over 25 years before going on the bench. One would expect that such a person would be unmasked much, much sooner than that.

On the other hand -- and I'm talking about me now, not about the judge in question -- I have a colleague -- a friend -- who, when I would get depressed about the practice; or about certain of my fellow practitioners; or about ungrateful, non-paying clients, would try and cheer me up by pointing out the absurdities of the situation. We have to laugh at things, she would tell me, if only to keep from crying.

No less an authority than the Mayo Clinic says that laughter can relieve stress. I would guess that many people might see the judge's most recent assignment as somewhat stressful.

Ah -- you say -- stress is no excuse: People who are stressed should not circulate tasteless cartoons, they should use tried and true stress relief measures, like abusing alcohol or drugs.

No... wait... that doesn't sound right.

Here's my take on it, for what it's worth: Judges have responsibilities and obligations that non-judges do not share. For example, judges should not engage in what is called "shitposting." Or even forwarding someone else's shitpost. My prediction is that the present situation will most likely be addressed internally -- the Supreme Court has judicial mentoring programs, for example -- and not necessarily by the Judicial Inquiry Board and the Courts Commission. Although it is a trite cliche to say so, in this case I think it applies: Time will tell.

Friday, January 10, 2025

Next Tuesday: Protecting Jews on Campus CLE

The Decalogue Society of Laywers will be presenting a CLE seminar next Tuesday, January 14, from 5:15 to 6:45 p.m. entitled "Protecting Jews on Campus." The poster for this event is reproduced above.

Registration for this Zoom event closes Monday, January 13, at noon. Register via this page on the Decalogue website or by clicking https://dsl.memberclicks.net/20240114cle.

Monday, January 06, 2025

Dr. Klumpp looks at the data: What were the major influences on the 2024 Cook County judicial retention vote?

FWIW is once again pleased to present a Guest Post by Albert J. Klumpp, a PhD in public policy analysis with a national reputation for expertise on judicial races. His article, "California's Judicial Retention Elections: Past, Present, and Future," appeared in the December 2024 issue of the Orange County Lawyer Magazine. Dr. Klumpp has been a generous contributor to FWIW for many years.

by Albert J. Klumpp

This past November 20, I provided FWIW with a preliminary analysis of Cook County’s November 5 judicial retention voting, based on preliminary vote totals and available information. Now that final, official vote totals are available, and using better information in certain categories, I’ve completed a full analysis including ward- and township-level results. As promised, here are some of the details.

■ Voter Participation: Roughly 68% of Cook County voters completed the retention ballot. The figure is higher than long-term historical numbers but is the lowest since 2016—indicating that the surge of voter interest in judicial retention that happened in 2018 is fading somewhat, as it typically has done in similar situations in retention jurisdictions. The highest and lowest participation rates:
■ Voter Approval: The baseline approval rate countywide, controlling for all other factors, was 74.8%. This is a typical value based on recent history. Locations with the highest and lowest baselines:
■ Name Cues: The final figures for name-based voting are virtually identical to the preliminary ones: 1.7% for female; 1.0% for Irish; 1.4% for Black. For Hispanic names the analysis produced a figure of 0.4% but it was not statistically significant. All of the Hispanic-majority locations did favor Hispanic names, but the historical pattern countywide is that heavily ethnic names of whatever origin tend to lag very slightly behind other names. Those two factors tend to offset, as they did here. The highest name-based votes for each category:
Notably, nearly all of the highest pro-female numbers came from Hispanic-majority locations. I had not noticed such a thing before and will have to check past results to see if it is a regular occurrence.

■ Bar Associations: The ratings of local bar associations together influenced 18.2% of the vote. Considering that the figure two years ago was 15.0%, and that for the second consecutive election major newspapers did not report bar ratings, this result was unexpectedly high. The analysis also confirms that ratings from the smaller bars were more influential than ever before, providing nearly half of that 18.2% figure. As I explained in my most recent post, the most prominent sources of bar ratings found in mobile-device searches did not limit themselves to the major bars but rather offered voluminous presentations covering all of the bars. The heaviest users of bar ratings:
■ Social Media Sources: The Girl, I Guess voter guide is continuing to grow in influence. Six years ago when it debuted, it captured 3.4% of the retention vote. Four years ago the figure increased to 4.2%, and two years ago it increased again to 5.3%. Last month the figure increased for a third straight time, to 6.1%. The guide was statistically detectable in 41 wards and 26 townships.

The Chicago Votes! young voters guide, which in 2022 incorporated the original “Cheat Sheet” guide first seen in 2020, this time simply recommended a No vote for every judge who was flagged by Injustice Watch for a negative rating or controversy. Usage of the guide, and also of the Injustice Watch information for anyone who employed the same decision strategy, was 2.7%.

The largest figures for each source:
And two final tables showing the combined information use from all sources:
As FWIW readers know, there are other sources of ratings on retention judges besides these. But typically their impact is too small to detect statistically and so I do not attempt to do so. One limited exception is the Fraternal Order of Police ratings. Countywide the FOP ratings were not detectable, but they did have influence in the 11th, 13th, 38th, 41st and 45th Wards. The 41st produced the highest number, 4.3%.

As usual, these figures are statistical estimates with margins of error, but everything cited above (without qualification) is considered highly statistically significant.

I’ll have one final post about this election cycle, to examine campaign spending for judicial vacancies. That one has to wait for the final quarterly reports to be filed by candidates who were in several partisan contests.

Bonnie McGrath remembered

Bonnie McGrath, who passed away unexpectedly just before Christmas (which would have been her 74th birthday), came to the law later in life, having done other things first.

It is not that unusual for lawyers to choose their profession after trying something else for a time. Many lawyers, including a number of judges, have taken up the law after serving as a police officer; one of my many ex-partners worked first as a teacher. After earning degrees in community health education and public health, Bonnie McGrath worked as a telephone installer for a number of years before taking up journalism. She was not licensed as an attorney in Illinois until 1993.

McGrath did not follow a traditional path to the bar.

An obituary posted on the CBS2 website documents some of McGrath's many intersts and, inter alia, links to a tribute posted on Project Onward's Instagram page.

FWIW readers will recall McGrath's several judicial campaigns: She ran countywide in 2010, 2016, and 2020. During that last campaign, McGrath said she was making her sixth run. In addition to the three mentioned here so far, I know McGrath sought an 8th Subcircuit vacancy in 2018. I've somehow missed one, because the only other one I can remember was her countywide run in 1998.

In 1998 McGrath ran as "Bonnie Fitzgerald McGrath" and got roasted for it. Her journalistic contacts and credentials -- including stints with the Chicago Tribune -- did not stop the Tribune from making her the 1998 poster child for all that the Tribune thought wrong about judicial elections.

In those far-off days the Tribune could be counted on doing one, and usually only one, 'news' story in every election cycle, focusing on the real or imagined sins of one particular judicial candidate, which story would then serve as an anchor for the Tribune's biennial scold about Why We Need Merit Selection of Judges. One year, the Tribune singled out a particular judicial candidate because several members of her successful family donated a lot of money to her campaign (she lost, which would have undermined the dire warning of the editorial about money buying judgeships, but the Tribune never noted the irony). In 1998, it was Bonnie's turn, her alleged sin being the attempted exploitation of voter ignorance by adopting "Fitzgerald" as a nickname or middle name just in time for a primary election falling (as it usually does) around the Feast of St. Patrick.

(IIRC, McGrath said she did it on the recommendation of her election lawyer. Who knows? It might even have worked... if the Tribune's Eye of Sauron had not come to focus on her campaign. But that was long ago: Anyone trying a similar tactic today would almost certainly be removed from the ballot. See, here, here, and, most recently, here.)

And why were voters ignorant of the relative qualifications of judicial candidates you may ask? If the Tribune's editors ever asked themselves such a question, they never recognized that the newspaper's policy of running one, and only one, 'news' story during a judicial election cycle, focusing in on only one of many candidates, might be a contributing factor.

But, if McGrath got no special considerations from her fellow journalists, the experience did not sour her on continuing to write, and publish, in the Reader, the Tribune, and elsewhere. In her statement on FWIW concerning her 2020 campaign, McGrath noted that she'd won 25 major journalism awards. She also pointed out, "I won three awards for legal writing from the Chicago Bar Association, and one of my articles was cited in a law review. I did regular columns in the Illinois Bar Journal and the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, and have been on the Chicago Bar Association editorial board for 28 years."

McGrath was still a member of the board of editors of the CBA Record at the time of her passing. I first met her, many years back, when I served a much shorter term on that editorial board. I used to link to her blogsite on Chicago Now from the sidebar here on FWIW. When the Tribune folded Chicago Now a couple of years back, McGrath moved to Substack.

In preparing this article I spent a lot of time trying to locate a lengthy piece that McGrath published on Chicago Now concerning why she stopped participating in judicial evaluations. I can't find it. The links to that article that McGrath provided when she commented here or provided a guest post no longer work.

McGrath had substantive and thoughtful arguments about the biases and limitations of bar association judicial evaluations... but adhering to her principles and declining to participate necessarily resulted in her being rated "not recommended" when she made her later runs.

Despite the automatic opposition of the bar associations to her judicial campaigns, Bonnie McGrath continued to participate in bar activities. In addition to the CBA Record, McGrath chaired several CBA Committees over the years, including the Criminal Law and Bench/Bar Relations committees. Some years back, she was also president of the Decalogue Society of Lawyers.

Bonnie was an interesting person, with a wide and varied acquaintance, and a talent for sharing what she saw and what she remembered... like this Substack piece from 2023, "In 1969, I had to listen to 16-year-old Mandy Patinkin sing Broadway tunes in his South Shore living room because his mother made me...." She will be missed.