Tuesday, November 05, 2019

Thirty on the official Short List for 15 Associate Judge vacancies

This Short List is different.

No recent has list had so many carryovers from prior lists -- no consolation, of course, to a number of disappointed finalists from 2018 and prior who were left off this list.

Let's start with the carryovers. There are 11, 10 from the 2018 list.
  1. Amee Elizabeth Alonso
  2. Marina E. Ammendola
  3. Lloyd James Brooks
  4. Michael Angelo Forti (on 2014 list)
  5. John S. Fotopoulos
  6. Michael James Hogan Jr.
  7. Celestia Laurene Mays
  8. Diane Marie Pezanoski
  9. Leo Steven Rakowski
  10. Curtis Bennett Ross
  11. Levander Smith Jr.
Five of the 26 finalists on the 2016 list were carryovers from the 2014 selection. Two were selected.

Only two of the 34 finalists on the 2018 list were carryovers from the 2016 selection. Both were selected.

Then there's the fact that four candidates on this list are slated by the Cook County Democratic Party for countywide vacancies. Three of these four are already serving as judges (and all three were AJ finalists in 2018, too).

These are Judges Celestia L. Mays (appointed to, and slated for, the countywide Funderburk vacancy), Levander Smith, Jr. (appointed to, and slated for, the countywide Larsen vacancy), and Lloyd James Brooks (appointed to, and slated for, the O'Brien vacancy). Laura Ayala-Gonzalez is not yet a judge, but she is the Democratic Party's slated candidate for the countywide Ford vacancy.

The primary isn't until next March. Filing has not yet opened for these seats. Is this a commentary on the electability of these candidates in particular? Or is this the Circuit Court's way of signaling that Democratic Party slating generally no longer provides enough of an advantage for a favored candidate? Why are soft landings already being sought for candidates who have not yet even launched?

Other currently sitting judges on the Short List are Marina E. Ammendola (countywide Kevin Sheehan vacancy), Fredrick H. Bates (1st Subcircuit, Brooks vacancy), Tyria B. Walton (1st Subcircuit, Crawford vacancy), and Daniel O. Tiernan (14th Subcircuit, Lacy vacancy). One former judge, John S. Fotopoulos, is also on the Short List.

For last night's post I was able to confirm that at least one of the eight countywide alternates pre-slated by the Democratic Party, for vacancies that had, as of August, yet to open (and, as of tonight, still haven't opened) was on the Short List. Actually, there are three. In addition to Frank John Andreou, there are Diane Marie Pezanoski, and Eric Michael Sauceda.

Actually, putting alternates on the Short List makes sense, assuming some level of cooperation between the Democratic Party and the Circuit Court Nominating Committee: Making associates out of alternates should reduce the number of promises that might need to be remembered when the 2022 season starts up (that won't be until March 18, 2020).

In formally announcing the 2019 Short List, the Chief Judge's office noted that of the 212 applicants for this class, 18 withdrew from the process before interviews began. The Nominating Committee interviewed the remaining 194 applicants. One withdrew following the interview, leaving 163 of us sitting forlornly by their phones yesterday for the call that never came. The 30 applicants who did move on to the Short List are:
  1. Amee Elizabeth Alonso
  2. Marina E. Ammendola
  3. Frank John Andreou
  4. Laura Ayala-Gonzalez
  5. Fredrick Hayze Bates
  6. Aileen Bhandari
  7. Lloyd James Brooks
  8. Jennifer Frances Coleman
  9. John Abbrey Fairman
  10. Michael Angelo Forti
  11. John S. Fotopoulos
  12. Ruth Isabel Gudino
  13. Michael James Hogan Jr.
  14. Edward James Maloney
  15. Celestia Laurene Mays
  16. Katherine Angela O'Dell
  17. Monique Leneé Patterson
  18. Jennifer Joyce Payne
  19. Diane Marie Pezanoski
  20. Paul William Plotnick
  21. Leo Steven Rakowski
  22. Geri Pinzur Rosenberg
  23. Curtis Bennett Ross
  24. Eric Michael Sauceda
  25. Rouhy J. Shalabi
  26. John Anthony Simon
  27. Levander Smith Jr.
  28. Theresa Marie Smith
  29. Daniel Owen Tiernan
  30. Tyria Beatrice Walton
Here's what happens next: The Chief Judge notifies the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts of the names of the candidates selected by the Committee and requests the Director to begin the balloting process.

Within 14 days after the Chief Judge’s notification, the Director will mail a secret ballot with the names of each candidate to each of the roughly 250 Cook County circuit judges eligible to vote.

The judges will vote for one candidate for each vacancy to be filled. The judges must return the ballots to the Director within 14 days of the date the ballots were distributed. The Director then counts the ballots which are accompanied by a signed card, tabulates the results and certifies them to the Chief Judge – at all times maintaining the secrecy of the ballots.

It is my understanding that the circuit judges are free to vote for any applicant, whether on the short list or not. In the 2014 selection process, for example, the circuit judges elected a write-in candidate -- a sitting judge who had been bypassed by the Nominating Committee.

In 2016, the circuit judges also elected a write-in candidate, also a sitting judge who had been bypassed.

There was no successful write-in candidate in the 2018 selection process, but there was a tie for the 17th and final vacancy in that class.

The press release issued late this afternoon by the Chief Judge's office announces three different meet and greets for finalists on November 12, 13, and 14, at the Daley Center, the Leighton Criminal Courthouse, and the Cook County Juvenile Center. Other events will be scheduled at the other suburban courthouses to "further minimize disruption of court proceedings." But the finalists will also be trudging through the back hallways of all the county courthouses in the next few weeks, trying to personally lobby as many voting judges as they can.

For the record, the members of this year's Nominating Committee were Hon. Timothy C. Evans, Chief Judge; Hon. Mary Ellen Coghlan, Justice, Illinois Appellate Court; Hon. Grace G. Dickler, Presiding Judge, Domestic Relations Division; Hon. James P. Flannery Jr., Presiding Judge, Law Division; Hon. Sophia H. Hall, Administrative Presiding Judge, Juvenile Justice and Child Protection Resource Section; Hon. Moshe Jacobius, Presiding Judge, Chancery Division; Hon. Raymond L. Jagielski, Presiding Judge, Fifth Municipal District; Hon. LeRoy K. Martin Jr., Presiding Judge, Criminal Division; Hon. Sharon M. Sullivan, Presiding Judge, County Division; Hon. Shelley Sutker-Dermer, Presiding Judge, Second Municipal District; and Hon. E. Kenneth Wright Jr., Presiding Judge, First Municipal District.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Alright, this blog has been sleepy for a while, but it looks like everyone is waking up. Where is EP?

Anonymous said...

How amusing. People whining that this process isn’t fair. Go ride your unicorn and jump hurdles over rainbows while the adults plot and scheme for judicial robes.

Anonymous said...

It's interesting to note all of the repeat short list candidates who also made the last short list, but there also appears to be six first time short list finalists who have never even applied for associate judge before this cycle.

Anonymous said...

So how many of the people selected as fillers are self-aware to realize that they are not intended or expected to win. That’s why you are “filler.” Your purpose is to make this process appear to be a merit selection. So go run around and put up the good fight. Your consolation prize will be a Supreme Court appointment which, if you are black ( and especially if you are male) will likely be a short-term gig. Don’t be believe it: well, go into Jack’s archives for 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018. Tell us what you see. Good luck? No. God pity you.

Anonymous said...

How is Anon 11/6/19 @8:17 so certain that the first-time short-listers are also first-time applicants? Not disagreeing, but you seem awfully certain about the accuracy of that statement.

Anonymous said...

Don't vote for any of the appointed judges who have never run before. They wanted the appointment and said they would run. Well, run.

Jack Leyhane said...

I'm going to be criticized for refusing to publish various comments -- the angry follow-up comments, which probably also won't see the light of day, will accuse me of all sorts of things, including collusion with this person or that one in order to further my ambitions.

Let's see... I've been aspiring to the bench since 1993 and I've been covering judicial elections here since the 2008 election cycle. So my pandering has been really successful, hasn't it?

Actually, some of the comments I've been forced to flush have been publishable in part. However, I lack the ability to do that. So they must be flushed in toto.

The problem with so many of the comments I'm getting at this point is that they're libelous. Defamatory. "In Illinois, there are five categories of statements that are considered defamatory per se: (1) words that impute a person has committed a crime; (2) words that impute a person is infected with a loathsome communicable disease; (3) words that impute a person is unable to perform or lacks integrity in performing her or his employment duties; (4) words that impute a person lacks ability or otherwise prejudices that person in her or his profession; and (5) words that impute a person has engaged in adultery or fornication." Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill.2d 558, 579-580 (2006).

Although opinions are generally not actionable, even if they might open the holder of the opinion up for a punch in the nose, it is not enough to couch one's defamatory statements in terms of opinions (e.g., while I'm not a doctor, and I don't even play one on TV, in my opinion, Leyhane is obviously a leper). As the Solaia court stated, "there is no artificial distinction between opinion and fact: a false assertion of fact can be defamatory even when couched within apparent opinion or rhetorical hyperbole" (221 Ill.2d at 581). Nor can one "escape liability for defamatory factual assertions simply by claiming that the statements were a form of ridicule, humor or sarcasm" (Ibid).

Some of the comments in the queue are hitting 3 and even 4 of the 5 per se categories on multiple targets.

Never let it be said that FWIW does not have creative readers.

But why not put that creativity to better use? At least leave some room for arguable innocent construction. Better yet, make your point or float your rumor without also claiming that so-and-so is dying of plague and is also about to be indicted.

Anonymous said...

When the indictments break, Jack, you are going to have eat some serious crow. Without the soda bread.

Anonymous said...

Jack apparently doesn't like data points with context, everybody. So go into the FWIW Archives in 2009, 2010 and 2014 and see what you find for former candidate and current Associate Judge Linda Pauel. And then ask yourself: "did Tim Evans really help any of these appointed Circuit Judges who have been slated by the Crook County Democracked Party?" Early December will likely reveal the answer.

Anonymous said...

not sure why Jack would eat crow . Does he know who is to be indicted but is holding back ?
On another point, what about the Judges on the short list and those non-judges that have already announced they are running in March ?
Is it a fair question to ask them if you make AJ, will you not run in March ? Some would say why would they spend the time and money to do so ?
Well, some may want to be Full Circuit. Others want they extra pay. Some may just keep their name in the race but not spend any money and hope to get lucky while pulling votes from others. You really can't stop them but if they gave their word not to but did anyway, is that an ethics violation. Perhaps EP or ALL CAPS would know.

Anonymous said...

In happier news, RZA has announced that Wu Tang Clan should do a reunion tour with Rage Against the Machine. Perhaps we can have the Supreme Court candidates chime in about whether that is good or bad news. Points will be awarded on the originality of the candidate responses.

Anonymous said...

There is a write-in candidate.