Wednesday, August 31, 2022

Polish Supreme Court justice to give probate lecture next Wednesday

The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Elder Law will welcome Justice Mariusz Zalucki of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland to the Supreme Court Courtroom, 160 N. LaSalle St., 18th Floor, on Wednesday September 7, from noon to 1:30 p.m., for a lecture on "the challenges of present will formalities," addressing the handling of probate matters in the EU and providing observations about U.S. cases with, of course, an emphasis on Illinois law. A panel discussion will follow.

Illinois Supreme Court Chief Justice Anne M. Burke will provide a welcome for Justice Zalucki. Justyna H. Regan of Miller Canfield will provide an introduction. The subsequent panel discussion will be moderated by McHenry County Circuit Court Judge Michael J. Chmiel. The other panelists are Kerry Peck, the Chair of the Supreme Court Commission on Elder Law; Judge E. Kenneth Wright, Jr., Presiding Judge, 1st Municipal District; Judge Daniel B. Malone, the Presiding Judge of the Probate Division; and Agnes Ptasnik of Chuhak & Tecson, P.C.

There is no charge to attend the lecture and discussion, but seating is limited and advance registration is required. Registrants can also choose to attend via Zoom; a link will be provided upon registration. MCLE credit will be available for this program.

To register, email smithkaa@millercanfield.com. In your email, specify whether you wish to attend in person or via Zoom. Persons seeking MCLE credit will need to provide their ARDC numbers.

Miller Canfield, Peck Ritchey, and Chuhak & Tecson are underwriting this event. Co-sponsoring the event, along with the Supreme Court Commission on Elder Law, are the Advocates Society, the International Network of Boutique and Independent Law Firms, the Illinois Judges Association, the Illinois State Bar Association, and the Chicago Bar Association.

Tuesday, August 30, 2022

Upcoming Illinois House Democratic fundraisers that may be of interest to prospective Cook County judicial candidates

As I mentioned earlier today, there never will be a shortage of politicians ready, willing, and eager to separate the wannabe judge from any discretionary income he or she may have. What follows in this post is by no means an exhaustive list of the opportunities for the hopeful candidate to diminish his or her estate.

For the most part, I have tried to edit out most non-Cook County representatives and all non-Cook County venues. Not that a Downstate representative would not also be grateful for your support -- but his or her clout among the local judicial slatemakers would presumably be minimal, at best. Attendance at any or all of these events will not accord you a heavier political presence; the only thing guaranteed is a lighter wallet. But if you, by dint of your magnetic personality, can charm indifferent, if not hostile, strangers with snappy patter or sparkling small talk, here are some of the upcoming opportunities helpfully provided by politicians eager to hold elected office:
Rooftop Fundraiser with Rep. Nick Smith
Tuesday, September 13 | 5:30 - 7:30 p.m.
Joy District Rooftop | 112 W Hubbard St, Chicago
Sponsorships: $5,000 | $2,500 | $1,000 | $500
Make checks payable to:
Friends of Nicholas Smith
P.O. Box 286152
Chicago, IL 60628

Rep. Jones and Rep. Mayfield's Baseball Fundraiser
Saturday, September 17 | 6:10 p.m.
Wrigley Field | 1060 W. Addison, Chicago (Left Field Porch Area)
Sponsorship: $5,000 | $2,500 | $1,500 | $1,000 | $500 | $250
Make checks payable to:
Friends of Rita Mayfield, PO Box 344, Waukegan, IL 60079
Jones for State Representative, 289 Paxton Ave, Calumet City, IL 60409
RSVP before September 10 by calling (847) 975-3491

Rep. Bob Morgan Fall Brewery Social
Tuesday, September 20 | 5:30 - 7:00 p.m.
District Brew Yards | 417 N Ashland Ave, Chicago
Young Professional Ticket: $100
Sponsorship: $2,500 | $1,000 | $500 | $250
Online contributions: actblue.com/donate/220920dby
For more information or to RSVP directly, please contact Erin Schuler at mailto:eschuler@newchicagollc.com or (312) 448-8014

Rep. Fred Crespo Re-Election Fundraiser Tuesday, September 20 | 5:30 - 7:30 p.m.
Chicago Chop House | 60 West Ontario, Chicago (valet parking provided)
Individual Ticket: $150
Sponsorship: $1,500 | $500
Make checks payable to:
Citizens for Fred Crespo
313 Ronnie Drive
Buffalo Grove, Illinois, 60089-1149.
To RSVP contact Corryn Bradley at corryn@danshomon.com or call 708-490-9964

Speaker Welch Fall Fundraiser Wednesday, September 21 | The Old Post Office | 433 W. Van Buren St., Chicago
VIP Reception: 5:00 - 5:30 p.m.
Event: 5:30 - 7:30 p.m.
Individual Ticket: $250
Sponsorship: $20,000 | $12,000 | $6,000 | $3,000 | $1,000
You may also make checks payable to:
People for Emanuel "Chris" Welch
10055 W. Roosevelt Rd, Suite D
Westchester, IL 60154
Online contributions: actblue.com/donate/speakersept21
RSVP to Katy@kjdstrategies.com

Courts of Appeals and District Courts in Seventh and Eighth Circuits host 3rd Annual Bill of Rights Day Contest for students in grades 5-12

Admittedly, this runs a little far afield for FWIW fare, but the court sponsorships are the hook that makes this post relevant to FWIW readers.

We probably don't have too many students in grades 5-12 stopping by here on a regular basis, although surely some teachers do, and a number of FWIW readers have teachers in their lives with whom this post might be shared.

The idea is to get kids thinking about, and creating art and essays about, the importance of the Bill of Rights. That is a good and useful thing to do.

One grand prize winner from each of two age groups, grades 5-8 and grades 9-12, will recieve a $500 cash prize and the opportunity to take part in a vitrual event on Wednesday, December 7 with Federal judges and other experts, and have their name and submission shared on the websites of the participating United States District Courts. Semi-finalists from each District Court will receive a $50 prize.

The deadline for submissions is 5:00 p.m. Sunday, October 30.

Semi-finalists from each district will be notified before Thanksgiving and grand prize winners will be announced at the December 7 virtual event.

Teachers have an additional incentive to encourage their charges to enter this contest: When a teacher's name is included on the student's submission, the teacher will be entered into a gift card raffle. Teachers get additional chances in the raffle for each submission made by one of their students.

Of course there are a host of rules and regulations that contestants will have to navigate in order to make their submissions. But this page will provide that information for interested students and teachers.

LIC volunteers sought; September training sessions announced

The Chicago Bar Association's Edward J. Lewis II Lawyers in the Classroom Program has placed attorney voluneers in grammar school classrooms for over 30 years now, helping students "to better understand the U.S. Constitution, our legal system, and law-related careers," according to the program webpage.

To prepare for the academic year just underway, the LIC is requesting all interested attorneys (and returning volunteers) to sign up for one of two Attorney Information and Training Sessions. Both will be conducted online, one on September 9, and the other on September 16. The links in the preceding sentence will take interested persons to registration forms for the specific date.

According to the LIC, these sessions are intended "to prepare attorneys for their classroom assignments, [and] will focus on classroom standards, curriculum, collaboration with teacher partners, useful teaching strategies and how the program will be administered this school year."

For questions about the program, contact LIC Director Tiffani Watson at twatson@chicagobar.org.

Illinois Bar Foundation Chicago-area presidential reception set for September 21

The Illinois Bar Foundation is planning a Chicago-area presidential reception on Wednesday, September 21, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., at the Rolling Green Country Club, 2525 East Rand Road, Arlington Heights.

The IBF will honor Anna P. Krolikowska (ISBA President 2021-22) and Lisa M. Nyuli (IBF President 2020-2022) at this event.

Tickets for the event are $50 apiece and include "heavy hors d’oeuvres and open bar."

Sponsorships are also available:
  • Friend - $250
    Includes 2 event tickets, recognition during the formal presentation, name/logo on promotional materials and signage;

  • Patron - $500
    Includes 5 event tickets, recognition during the formal presentation, name/logo on promotional materials and signage;

  • Benefactor - $1,000
    Includes 10 event tickets, recognition during the formal presentation, name/logo on promotional materials and signage.
Proceeds from the event benefit the IBF. The IBF's mission, according to its website, "is to ensure meaningful access to the justice system, especially for those with limited means, and to assist lawyers who have fallen on hard times."

To obtain tickets, or register as a sponsor, click here.

The IBF will also have a Downstate reception, honoring Dennis J. Orsey and the late Jack C. Carey, on Wednesday, September 28, at the DoubleTree Hotel in Collinsville. Click on the link in this sentence for more information about the Downstate event.

Out of the Darkness Chicagoland Walk set for September 17 at Montrose Harbor

Oh, sure, there are political events upcoming, and I'll have a post up about some of these soon, if time permits. There will never be a shortage of politicians willing to take your discretionary income.

But if you, Mr. or Ms. Judicial Wannabe, are looking for a different way to increase your 'brand awareness' or whatever we're calling these things currently, you may wish to consider participating in the Out of Darkness Chicagoland Walk, sponsored by the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, on Saturday, September 17, at Montrose Harbor.

There are -- just as there are in political fundraisers -- sponsorship opportunities:
  • Hope - $1,000
    Your logo on event materials, including official t-shirt, website, and e-newsletters;

  • Support - $2,500
    All Hope benefits plus metnions in social media and in event announcements and Talk Saves LivesTM Suicide Prevention for Workplace Settings for your workplace;

  • Prevention - $5,000
    All Support benefits plus featured placement of logo/sign on walk route, featured social media posting and email outreach;

  • Change Maker - $10,000
    All Prevention benefits plus onsite walk tent with permission to distribute materials.
And, if you've really got some spare cash laying around, ask whether the Lifesaver sponsorship opportunity is still available. Persons working for big firms or companies may find that there are matching donation opportunities -- or you could set one up. All sponsorship information is available at this link. For more information about the September 17 Chicago walk, visit this page or email Diana Cazares at chicago@afsp.org.

Saturday, August 20, 2022

A few small changes have been made to this site's Sidebar

The 2022 candidate lists have been purged: All the unsucessful primary candidate websites have been removed, as have the websites of all successful candidates who face no opponent.

Get out your magnifying glasses, folks: The remaining list is very, very short. Because only in the far northwest suburban 13th Judicial Subcircuit is there any remaining judicial race for Cook County voters to decide.

When all the votes were counted in the race for the Democratic nomination for the Groebner vacancy in the 13th Subcircuit, Joe Gump edged out James "Jack" Costello by 161 votes, 11,789 to 11,628.

Gump, pictured at left, will face Republican nominee Gary William Seyring, shown below, in November.

So the new Sidebar candidate list is only two names long.

With the sole exception of this one race, people who didn't bother to vote in the Democratic primary in June were effectively denied the opportunity to participate in this year's Cook County judicial elections.

Friday, August 19, 2022

Decalogue and AABAR present 7th Annual Building Bridges Awards Ceremony September 13

The Decalogue Society of Lawyers and the Arab American Bar Association of Illinois will cohost the 7th Annual Building Bridges Award Ceremony on Tuesday, September 13, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., at the offices of Freeborn & Peters LLP, 311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3000.

Two "Champions of Voting Rights" will be honored at this year's presentation, Jan Schwartz. of the National Council of Jewish Women, and Atour Sargon, a member of the Lincolnwood Board of Trustees.
Admission to the event is free, but registration is required. To register, click on this link.

Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Advocates Society Annual Scholarship Fundraiser set for September 8

The Advocates Society, the Association of Polish-American Attorneys, will hold its Annual Scholarship Fundraiser on Thursday, September 8, from 6:00 to 10:00 p.m., at Maggiano's Little Italy, 516 N. Clark Street.

The event will feature a family-style, sit-down dinner starting at 7:00 p.m., with beer and wine included. The program and live auction will begin at 8:00 p.m. There will also be a silent auction, which closes at 9:00 p.m. All proceeds benefit the Polish-American Advocates Scholarship Foundation, a 501(c)(3) Non-Profit Organization.

The theme of this year's fundraiser is "A Salute to Polish Judges" and the Advocates will confer its President's Award on former Judge Joan Smuda (pictured at right) at the event.

Early bird tickets for the event are available (until August 26) for $150 apiece. After August 26, tickets will cost $175 apiece. To obtain tickets, visit this page of the Advocates website.

And, of course, there are sponsorship opportunities.

For $250 a sponsor receives one ticket, mention in the program book (name or logo), a logo placement on the Advocates website, a "shout-out on social media," and "verbal recognition" at the event. Click here to register as a sponsor. Persons looking to donate an item for the silent auction should complete this form and return it as directed. To just make a straight donation to the scholarship fund, click here. Questions about the event should be sent to advocatessociety@gmail.com.

It is unlikely that any regular FWIW readers would be eligible to apply

But some FWIW readers may know people with whom this information may be profitably shared:
All the details are available at this page of the Diversity Scholarship Foundation website; conveniently, the application begins on that page as well. Here are some of the requirements:
  • Applicants must have completed two semesters of law school coursework to qualify for a scholarship unless applying for the LSAT scholarship as an undergraduate student.
  • Failure to be present during the December 1 award presentation and through the end of the program will result in forfeiture of the scholarship.
  • As part of the application, prospective scholarship recipients will will have to provide a résumé and a school transcript.
  • Individuals who have previously received a scholarship from DSF may not be eligible, but applications will be accepted for consideration.
The deadline for scholarship applications is 5:00 p.m. Friday, September 30. Questions not answered by the website may be addressed to dsfchicago.scholarships@gmail.com.

CCBA, SSBA offer free domestic relations webinar

You can't beat the price.

The Cook County Bar Association and the South Suburban Bar Association have teamed up to offer a free CLE presentation, available via Zoom on Wednesday, August 24, from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m., entitled "Appearing Before Hearing Officers in Domestic Relations Matters."

Three judges are scheduled to speak at the program, Lionel Jean-Baptiste, Fredrick H. Bates, and Ericka Orr. A hearing officer based in the 6th Municipal District, Bob Stokas, will also present. While the program is free, advance registration is required. To register, visit this link.

Here is the flyer for the program:

Tuesday, August 16, 2022

Decalogue Society announces upcoming CLE presentations

The Decalogue Society is offering members at least 18 hours a year of free CLE. Of course, it's not entirely free if you have to buy a membership... but let's not quibble. This link will take interested persons to the Decalogue membership application.

Featured among the Decalogue's upcoming CLE presentations is a program entitled "Government Funding and the Separation of Church and State." This Zoom webinar will be held on Tuesday, September 20, from 5:15 to 7:15 p.m. Here's the flyer for the event:

Registration for this event is required by September 16.

Fundraiser for the Polish Museum of America at August 27 Chicago Fire match

I don't believe I've ever plugged a soccer game (sorry -- I meant match) on FWIW, but Audrey Cosgrove, the President of the Advocates Society, asked if I might promote the Saturday, August 27 match between the Chicago Fire and CF Montreal, at 7:00 p.m. at Soldier Field. Still, it's not as much of a stretch as you might think: One of my many ex-partners, Mark Boyle, was at one time the Soccer King of the South Side. Or at least a contender for the throne.

The match will be a fundraiser for the Polish Museum of America, with a portion of ticket proceeds to be donated to that institution.

This link will give interested persons all the information they need, including a variety of ticket options.

(Things sure have changed, though. The last time I saw the Chicago Fire play at Soldier Field, Virgil Carter was the quarterback....)

Monday, August 15, 2022

Fall Rush? All Bar Networking Social set for August 25

The All Bar Networking Social will take place on Thursday, August 25, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., at the Hubbard Inn, 110 W. Hubbard St.

Why did I mention "rush" in conjunction with this event? Well, according to event organizers, "Each association in attendance will have a representative who will be available to explain their respective legal organization’s goals and benefits of membership."

Unlike the fraternity or sorority rushes you may recall from your undergraduate days, however, you, the prospective attendee, will be able to pledge more than one bar association. In fact, that's kind of the whole idea: Meet representatives of a whole bunch of bar associations and join a new bar group, or two, or 10 -- and without fear of hazing.

Participating bar groups include the Advocates Society, the Alliance of Illinois Judges, the Arab American Bar Association of Illinois, the Asian American Bar Association of Greater Chicago, the Black Men Lawyers' Association, the Black Women Lawyers' Association of Greater Chicago, the Chicago Bar Association, the Cook County Bar Association, the Decalogue Society, the Filipino American Lawyers Association, Hellenic Bar Association, the Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois, the Illinois State Bar Association, LAGBAC (Chicago’s LGBTQ+ Bar Association), the Northwest Suburban Bar Association, the Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois, the South Asian Bar Association of Chicago, the Seventh Circuit Bar Association, and the Women's Bar Association of Illinois.

Also, the American Arbitration Association is on the list. It's not a bar association, but someone will be there from that group, too.

Back in the day, did Student Council get a booth at Fall Rush?

Regardless, tickets for the event are $40 apiece and are available at this link.

IVI-IPO 78th Annual Independents' Day Dinner set for Thursday

The Independent Voters of Illinois - Independent Precinct Organization will hold its 78th Annual Independents' Day Dinner on Thursday, August 18, at Maggiano's Little Italy, 516 N. Clark. A reception will begin at 6:00 p.m.; dinner will follow at 7:00.

Fortieth Ward Ald. Andre Vasquez will emcee the event, at which the IVI-IPO will confer the following awards:
  • Legal Eagle Award: April Preyar,
  • Barbara Merill-Rudy Lozano Labor Award: El Milagro Worker Committee,
  • Harold Washington Award: Drs. Alison Arwady and Ngozi Ezike,
  • Saul Mendelson Social Justice Award: Sean Tenner, Founder, Abolition Institute,
  • Kit Pfau Voting Rights Award: Jan Schwartz, Promote the Vote Illinois, and
  • Lifetime Achievement Award: Jesus Salazar.
Tickets for the event are $90 per person for members and $130 per person for non-members. The non-member price includes a year's membership in the IVI-IPO. Tickets are available at this link.

Courthouse insecurity? July incident, Supreme Court committee suggest new concerns about judicial safety

Someone sent me the link to the August 3 Dan Mihalopoulos article on the WBEZ website, "A Cook County judge expressed fears before a ‘very serious breach’ at the Daley Center."

The article refers to a letter, written in June by Associate Judge Joseph D. Panarese to the Illinois Supreme Court, which warned, "The vast majority of my colleagues do not feel safe at work or at home anymore," and asked the justices "not [to] overlook the dangerous situations that we as Judges are confronted with every day."

The WBEZ article uses Judge Panarese's letter as an omen, or foreshadowing, of an incident that occurred on the 4th floor of the Daley Center on Thursday, July 28.

According to a July 29 letter from Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans to Cook County Sheriff Thomas J. Dart, the incident involved "someone who was walking through the public hallways loudly and belligerently demanding to see ajudge and who then pulled a locked courtroom door open breaking into the courtroom, eliminating all physical obstacles to the private areas where judges and judicial staff work." According to a memo sent by Judge Evans to all judges, the incident was resolved without any "physical harm" when 'quick-thinking' Traffic Division judges pulled courtroom "staff into their chambers and called for assistance."

What makes the incident particularly unsettling is the fact that it occurred in the middle of the day, at approximately 1:00 p.m., according to the Chief Judge's memo, and, according to the Chief Judge's letter to Sheriff Dart, there "appeared to be no deputies available to respond."

In the letter to Sheriff Dart, Evans wrote, "The gradual decrease in staffing in recent years seems to have left all courtroom floors in the Daley Center and other courthouses with the same degree of vulnerability."

Apparently the decrease in the number of courtroom deputies is not a new problem.

Indeed, on July 6, after the Panarese letter but three weeks before the Daley Center incident, the Illinois Supreme Court entered an order establishing a new Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Security and Safety.

In a press release announcing the new Committee, Chief Justice Anne M. Burke is quoted as saying, "Threats to the judiciary continue to increase and the Committee will help us address them."

The Chair of the new Committee will be Jim Cimarossa, the Marshal of the Supreme Court of Illinois. Appointed as members of the Committee are First District Appellate Court Justice Mathias W. Delort, Second District Appellate Court Justice George Bridges, Twelfth Circuit Court Judge Susan T. O’Leary, Cook County Circuit Judge E. Kenneth Wright, Twenty-Second Circuit Court Michael J. Chmiel, and retired Judge Mark A. VandeWiele.

Additional appointed members will include the Executive Director of the Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission (ARDC), a representative of the Illinois State Police, a representative of the Illinois Sheriffs’ Association, and a representative of the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police.

Saturday, August 13, 2022

What to do about impaired judges: A Ken White story about events nearly 30 years ago

Ken White is a California attorney and podcaster. His Twitter account, @Popehat, is active, pungent, and often enlightening. And he also has a Substack. His most recent Substack piece, "Who Judges the Judges?" is a powerful remembrance about his ultimately unsuccessful efforts to help a federal judge confront his alcoholism.

Lawyers don't usually write about these things. I do not believe that Mr. White was employing some rhetorical device in confessing his reluctance, even now, after all of the principal parties involved are dead; I believe his reluctance was sincere -- and deeply ingrained in most of us.

Most of us, that is, if one excludes the anonymous trolls who would see this post as an opportunity to try and smear sitting judges in the comments to this post, were I to permit comments.

Which I won't, thank you.

Instead, I'll offer a commercial for the Illinois Lawyers’ Assistance Program (LAP). The services provided by LAP are entirely confidential. Quoting now from the LAP website:
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 1.6(d) mandates confidentiality for all information received by LAP volunteers and trained interveners during interventions and related meetings. Both the volunteer and client are assured that anything disclosed is specifically protected by the attorney client privilege. The only exception relates to a client signing a release of information asking LAP to report on his or her behalf to another organization or individual. Additionally, the Interveners and Reporter Immunity Law guarantees immunity for LAP Volunteers and those who participate in its work.
It's a conundrum, I realize. The more we care, the more reluctant we may be to talk about a judge's, or a colleague's, alcohol or drug abuse. Gossips may snipe about this judge or that one knocking back more than a couple of barley pops at a golf outing, or slurring just a bit when making small talk at an awards dinner. But if someone is important to us -- a dear friend, a family member -- we are first inclined to look the other way, or even make excuses when we hear damaging rumors. But these persons most inclined to be silent are often those best equipped to determine whether a person has developed a real problem.

As in so many things, the helpful thing is not to say nothing, but to say the right thing, at the right time, to the right people. Mr. White tried, a generation ago, and failed. Sadly, failure is always a possibility because, ultimately, the person who is drinking too much, or abusing medication, must take responsibility for his or her own problems. No matter how much people around him or her may care. Or plead. Or even beg.

LAP is no magic bullet. But it is a powerful tool. It might have been helpful for Mr. White 30 years ago. Mr. White's willingness to come forward now might provide that last necessary nudge for someone to seek help now. For yourself, perhaps, or for someone about whom you care. LAP's email address is gethelp@illinoislap.org.

Thursday, July 28, 2022

Things I found out, including things that have been handed to me

From the silver platter department, this 'heat map' of the vote distribution in the race for the Rogers vacancy in the 4th Subcircuit, courtesy of Frank Calabrese:

Following up on last week's story about the appointment of Arlene Y. Coleman-Romeo to a countywide vacancy that I thought was going to be assigned to a new subcircuit under the Judicial Circuits Districting Act of 2022: It will be. It just hasn't happened yet.

In response to a query from FWIW, the Supreme Court's press officer injected a note of caution that I do not believe to be required here (note the use of the word "if"): "The vacancy created by Maras’ retirement will be filled by election in 2024 so if it needs to be allotted to a subcircuit, that allotment will occur closer to the 2024 election. Per statute, the Chief Justice certifies vacancies prior to each election and in that certification indicates which subcircuit each vacancy is allotted to."

The inference here is that the Supreme Court currently has no allocation order (such as was created when the initial 15 subcircuits came into existence in the early 1990s). If there isn't one, however, there will be.

Speaking of vacancies, FWIW hears that the number of Associate Judge vacancies has increased from 10 to 14 at this point and that interviews of the current class of applicants are about to begin. Interviews will be scheduled as bar association ratings are completed for each applicant.

There were 212 applicants in this current round -- but some of these were successful candidates in the recent primary and therefore have no need to pursue one of the AJ vacancies.

Thursday, July 21, 2022

Arlene Y. Coleman-Romeo appointed to countywide vacancy

In an order entered yesterday, the Illinois Supreme Court appointed Arlene Y. Coleman-Romeo to the countywide vacancy created by the recent retirement of Judge Marcia Maras.

The appointment is effective September 16 and terminates on December 2, 2024.

Licensed in Illinois since 1987, according to ARDC, Coleman-Romeo has been engaged in private practice with A. Y. Coleman & Associates.

Coleman-Romeo has previously applied for associate judge, most recently in March of this year.

Tuesday, July 19, 2022

So... we're doing THIS again?

The Office of Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans announced today that another three judges and six employees have tested positive for COVID-19. The three judges were last at the Daley Center, according to today's announcement -- which follows yesterday's announcement (accessible at the same link) that five more employees of the Chief Judge's Office had tested positive for the virus, one for the second time.

According to the Chief Judge's announcements, when employees or judges have tested positive more than once, they are counted only once in the total. By this reckoning, 112 judges have tested positive for COVID-19, as have 1,109 employees "working under the auspices of the Office of the Chief Judge," and 209 JTDC residents.

It isn't just courthouse employees who are coming down with the bug-we-liked-to-think-was-gone.

Although he's taking some time off, Rich Miller of CapitolFax.com found time to Tweet today about Governor J.B. Pritzker's announcement that (despite being vaccinated and "double boosted") he, too, has caught the Covid:
New variants, each more contagious than the previous one, are apparently spreading like wildfire. It appears that new hospitalizations have not yet reached a critical phase, however, suggesting that (a) the new variants aren't as virulent as those that came before, (b) vaccinations have ameliorated the worst effects of the new variants even though the virus is spreading among the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike, (c) we're just sick and tired of talking about this disease, and/or (d) some or all of the above.

The Mayo Clinic has a nifty map of Illinois that shows, on a county-by-county basis where, and to what extent, the virus is spreading these days. It has published figures suggesting that there are, on average, over the past seven days, over 1,800 new Covid cases each day in Cook County:



(Mayo is defining "average daily cases" as "the average number of new cases a day for the past seven days. This seven-day rolling average is calculated to smooth out fluctuations in daily case count reporting.")

The virus is apparently not as tired of us as we are of it.

Wednesday, July 06, 2022

Supreme Court announces creation of new Committee on Judicial Security and Safety

The Supreme Court's press release today is reprinted here in full:

The Illinois Supreme Court announced today the creation of the Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Security and Safety (the Committee).

The Order announcing the creation of the Committee is available on the Court website by clicking here.

“The Supreme Court is committed to ensuring the safety of our judges and justices,” Chief Justice Anne M. Burke said. “Threats to the judiciary continue to increase and the Committee will help us address them.”

The Committee is tasked with providing the Court with developments and recommendations related to the judicial threat environment and protective operations, intelligence, and information.

The committee will also coordinate with the Court’s judicial and law enforcement partners to monitor and review current and anticipated future judicial security needs and make appropriate recommendations to the Court.

The Chair of the Committee will be Jim Cimarossa, the Marshal of the Supreme Court of Illinois. Appointed as members of the Committee are First District Appellate Court Justice Mathias W. Delort, Second District Appellate Court Justice George Bridges, Twelfth Circuit Court Judge Susan T. O’Leary, Cook County Circuit Judge E. Kenneth Wright, Twenty-Second Circuit Court Michael J. Chmiel, and the Hon. Mark A. VandeWiele (ret.).

Additional appointed members will include the Executive Director of the Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission (ARDC), a representative of the Illinois State Police, a representative of the Illinois Sheriffs’ Association, and a representative of the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police.

IJF Golf Outing Set for July 22

The Odyssey Golf Course, 19110 S. Ridgeland, in Tinley Park, is the site for this year's Illinois Judges Foundation Golf Outing.

The event will take place on Friday, July 22, starting with a noon lunch and a 1:00 p.m. shotgun start. An awards dinner will follow at 6:00 p.m. The $150 per person cost includes golf cart rental, lunch, dinner, and drink tickets. Drink tickets may be used at the dinner or on the course. For persons not willing to subject themselves to the humiliation of playing golf before witnesses, or for those who simply can not break away during the day, dinner-only tickets are available for $60 per person. Registration for either option may be accomplished at this page of the IJF website.

Readers may not be surprised to learn that sponsorships are also available for this event:
  • Hole Sponsor - $200.00
  • Silver Sponsor - $500.00
  • Gold Sponsor - $1,000.00
  • Platinum Sponsor - $2,500.00
  • Awards Sponsor - $1,500.00
  • Beverage Cart Sponsor - $1,500.00
  • Lunch Sponsor - $1,500.00
Platinum sponsors get eight free golf tickets (a $1,200 value). Registration for any of these sponsorships can be accomplished via the same page of the IJF website at which tickets are offered. Anyone wanting more information about these sponsorship opportunities should email Dawn Gonzalez.

The Odyssey Golf Course is operated by the Odyssey Golf Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that provides both the therapeutic and recreational benefits of golf to veterans, active military personnel, and children and adults with special needs. For more about the work of the Odyssey Golf Foundation, click here.

The Illinois Judges Foundation is the charitable arm of the Illinois Judges Association. The IJF funds educational, civic, and scholarship projects which advance the rule of law, the legal profession, and the administration of justice, and encourages judicial participation in these endeavors.

Mitchell won't have to wait until December

The resignation of Justice Shelly Harris from the Illinois Appellate Court becomes effective today, July 6.

Circuit Court Judge Raymond W. Mitchell won the Democratic Party's nomination for the Harris vacancy last week and faces no Republican opponent in November.

Absent a meteor strike or something else totally unexpected, therefore, Mitchell will therefore be sworn in on the first Monday in December as Justice Harris's successor.

But he won't have to wait that long to take up Justice Harris's duties: Last Friday, the Illinois Supreme Court entered an Order, effctive today, appointing Mitchell to the Harris vacancy. (Here's the press release announcing the promotion.)

Tuesday, July 05, 2022

Illinois Latino Judges Association Installation and Awards Ceremony set for July 29

The Illinois Latino Judges Association will hold its annual Installation and Awards Ceremony on Friday, July 29, from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m., at Chicago Kent College of Law, 565 W. Adams.

Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans will be a special guest. Refreshments and "delicious Latino fare" will be served. Ticket prices are $25 for members, $50 for non-members, and are availabe at this Eventbrite link.

Saturday, July 02, 2022

Dr. Klumpp: Bar ratings more significant than ever in this judicial primary

This morning FWIW is honored to present this Guest Post by Albert J. Klumpp, a generous and frequent contributor to FWIW over the years, a research analyst with a public policy PhD, and the author of several scholarly works analyzing judicial elections.

by Albert J. Klumpp

By all accounts this was supposed to be a boring primary, particularly as it related to judicial candidates. Low turnout and nothing unusual.

Low turnout? Yes, without question. But nothing unusual? Hardly.

Turnout, as FWIW has already noted, was exceptionally low. At roughly 19 percent, it was the second-lowest for a modern-era primary, above only the 2014 primary—which similarly had little of competitive interest at the top of either party’s ballot.
As for the judicial contests, the voters who did turn out did not neglect them. In fact, the ballot dropoff for the twelve countywide judicial contests was the lowest ever, at only 16 percent.
A high participation rate in bottom-of-the-ballot contests is typical in a low-turnout election. With fewer casual voters turning out, the more diligent voters who always turn out and complete the entire ballot comprise a higher percentage of the electorate. But even so, this primary’s voters were singularly attentive to the judicial section of the ballot.

And the choices made by those voters were unlike any seen in a previous primary. Yes, the usual influences were present. Slating, for instance: candidates slated by the county Democratic party saw a boost of roughly 14 percentage points, one of the highest numbers in recent years. This is not a surprise. When turnout is lower, slating usually—not always but usually—is more valuable, since party loyalists who are reliable voters comprise more of the electorate.

The subcircuit contests showed this as well. Of the sixteen subcircuit contests, I was able to identify ten in which one candidate received all or most of the local political support, and nine of those ten candidates were winners.

Gender also played a significant role. Lower-turnout elections tend to see less of a pro-female vote, and this year there were no female candidates at the top of the ballot to attract female voters. Nevertheless, the gender vote in this primary was roughly 17 percentage points, a surprisingly high number. Possibly the timing of the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion ruling was a factor, but this is only speculation.

Neither gender nor slating, though, was the biggest influence on the judicial voting. Nor were name cues. The advantages of Irish, Black and Hispanic surnames were difficult to estimate in this primary because of the small number of candidates, but they clearly were smaller than in previous years. Likewise, ballot position was less influential; the first ballot position seemed to be worth roughly four percentage points, but again this turned out to be difficult to measure due to the low number of candidates.

One other relevant factor was the “Girl I Guess” progressive voter guide that has been a detectable presence in the two most recent November retention elections. It influenced roughly six percent of the vote. This is an impressive achievement for a single individual, but it was not part of any larger grassroots movement that was the primary cause of anyone’s victory or defeat.

So what was the biggest single influence? Amazingly, bar association ratings.

This was a first for any primary in Cook County’s history. Just as with slating, there is a reliable segment of the electorate that votes based on independent evaluations of judicial candidates. Usually the percentage size of this segment reaches double digits, although in the three previous primaries it did not. In this primary, between the Chicago Bar Association’s ratings and those of the Alliance of Bar Associations, candidates who held or shared higher ratings than their opponents gained an advantage of a whopping 29 percentage points.

With one very marginal exception (Paul Joyce had one more HR rating than Michael Weaver), all twelve countywide contests were won by candidates who held or shared the highest bar ratings in their contests. And only three of the sixteen subcircuit winners had lower bar ratings than their opponents. Two of those three were in subcircuits where bar ratings have always had little or no impact (the 1st and the 14th), and the third was the Raines-Welch victory in the 4th, which was dominated by name recognition and a huge campaign fund.

To be clear, the 29 percent figure represents only about 120,000 voters, only a fraction of the number of information-using voters in the 2018 and 2020 retention elections. The high percentage is in part due simply to the low overall turnout. But what makes the figure remarkable is that it was done with no help from either of the major Chicago newspapers. The Tribune and Sun-Times both completely ignored the judicial part of the ballot, providing no endorsements of their own and not even reporting bar association ratings. This was the first time in at least a half-century (and likely much longer) that the Chicago print media offered no voter guidance in a judicial election.

In analyzing the 2018 and 2020 retention elections for FWIW I noted evidence that the Internet and smartphones seemed to be driving an increase in information-based voting on retention judges. This primary further suggests that the ease of access to websites and search engines, even while in the voting booth, is becoming an important influence on judicial voting in Cook County. Of course, this depends on voters being motivated to seek out information in the first place, but in the current climate of concern over criminal justice issues, some voters clearly have the motivation.

Finally, two bits of fine print. One is that all of the percentage figures cited above are statistical estimates with margins of error, but all except for those I indicated as uncertain are formally statistically significant. Two, the analysis does not account for campaign spending totals, which are unavailable at this time. Campaign spending can have a substantial impact on subcircuit contests and may have affected the subcircuit results discussed above, but that analysis will have to wait until the candidates’ campaign finance reports become publicly available.

Thursday, June 30, 2022

Inaugural Induction Ceremony for the Order of Themis set for July 13

The inaugural induction ceremony for the newly-formed Order of Themis, the Hellenic Judges Association, will take place on Wednesday, July 13, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., at the Rooftop at Avli on the Park, 180 North Field Blvd.

Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans will conduct the induction of the officers and directors of this new organization.

Tickets for the event are $125 each and will include appetizers, beer, and wine. A cash bar will also be available. Sitting and retired judges will recieve a one-year membership in the Order of Themis with the purchase of a ticket.

Tickets are available through this Eventbrite link but, if you want to show off your techno-skills, you can probably accomplish this same task by scanning the QR code in the image above. I make no warranties in this regard however.

Looking at the numbers, such as they are, in the Subcircuit races

For Part 1 of this survey, see this post which looks at turnout numbers as a whole and results in countywide races for the Circuit and Appellate Courts.

All of the caveats set out in Part 1 apply here -- numbers will change -- margins will shrink or grow as VBM ballots are received and accounted for. I'm using a calculator and wearing my glasses but accept full responsibility for any addition errors that may occur when I combine results in subcircuits that extend across City and suburban boundaries. Where the margins are now small, when the final results are known, some races may appear to have 'flipped.'

They will not have 'flipped' of course; it is only the order in which ballots are received and counted that makes it look as if races have 'flipped' -- as FWIW readers surely know. The results in the 13th Subcircuit, on the Democratic side at least, will probably not be determined until the last timely votes are relinquished by the postal authorities... although, what was a seven vote margin for Gump is now over 100 votes in Gump's favor.

With all this in mind, we start looking at subcircuit results.

City and Suburban Subcircuits
City-only Subcircuits
Suburban-only Subcircuits

Looking at the numbers, such as they are, in Cook County judicial races

Part 1

The Chicago Board of Elections reports that there are 1,498,813 registered voters in our fair city. I know for a fact that this figure is off by at least two: Two of my daughters still show up as registered voters in my home precinct, registered at my home address, although both are properly registered, and actually vote, in the suburbs where they in fact live.

But we will use the City's figure anyway. According to the CBOE, 297,802 of these 1,498,813 registered voters performed their most basic civic duty, voting in this week's primary. That's a turnout figure of 19.9%.

The Cook County Clerk's Office, which manages suburban elections, says there are 1,630,741 registered voters in what the first Mayor Daley used to call 'the county towns.' Of these, 311,752 are reported to have voted in Tuesday's primary. That's a 19.1% turnout.

Put it together: There are 3,129,554 reported registered voters in Cook County. Of these, 19.5% came out Tuesday (or earlier) -- 609,554.

But wait: It gets worse.

Ours is a partisan primary system, of course. One must choose a Democratic or Republican ballot, or some other, in order to vote in the primary. I kind of want to meet the six reported persons who took out "nonpartisan ballots" in the City of Chicago in this primary. They might be an interesting group. There were 1,077 "nonpartisan" voters in the suburbs, but there were referenda and other questions on some suburban ballots that might have brought out persons who would otherwise have stayed home, lest their partisan affiliation become known to their neighbors.

There were 878 Libertarian voters in the City and another 1,127 in the suburbs, and the suburbs also had 72 Green Party voters.

Day after day, night after night, in every TV program, on every channel, for several months now, until Tuesday, Chicago area viewers were subjected to an endless barrage of commercials for and against Irwin, Bailey, or Sullivan. Republican commercials for, or against, one of these three. Democratic commercials for Bailey and against Irwin. Pritzker spent millions. Ken Griffin spent millions. Dick Uihlein spent millions.

And for what? Or, more specifically, for whom?

There were a grand total of 130,550 voters who took Republican ballots in this primary, 32,834 in the City and 97,716 in the suburbs. That's 4.2% of all registered voters.

In any event, that leaves 475,844 voters who took Democratic ballots in this primary election, 264,084 in the City and 211,760 in the suburbs. That's 15.2% of the registered voters in the county as a whole.

And these few, these hardy few, decided all of the judicial elections in Cook County for 2022 (save one).

Because all the winners of the Democratic judicial primaries (except in one 13th Subcircuit race) are all unopposed in November.

This is great -- and I do not mean to suggest otherwise -- for the individual candidates who won their races and are now assured of taking office come the first Monday in December. But how can this be healthy for society as a whole?

In other words, no one should be criticized for playing by the rules -- that's what we're all supposed to do -- but maybe we should reflect, from time to time, whether the rules might need just a little revision. Like, for example, whether we might be better served with non-partisan primaries for judges, so that the 130,000 or so of our neighbors who were browbeaten into voting for Irwin or Bailey or Sullivan are not denied any voice in the selection of judges. (And the six City voters who took non-partisan ballots would not be shut out either.)

Some of the above numbers may change, a little, by the time the results are certified. The rough percentages will not. And there are still mail-in ballots that may have posted in a timely fashion that remain in the clutches of the United States Postal Service.

As of yesterday, the Cook County Clerk reports, there were still 27,387 votes 'uncounted' in the suburbs. Of this number, only 126 are mail-in ballots that are received but not yet tabulated. Some of these others are provisional ballots, not counted because registration was in question, or for other reasons like that, but the bulk of this large number, some 26,319, represents ballots which were sent out, at voters' request, but which have not yet been returned.

Not all of these are coming back. But the law requires that we wait two weeks to be absolutely sure.

I don't have City figures; if they are published, I haven't found them, but it seems safe to say they may be similar.

So the following figures may also change but, as you will see, in these races, the margins appear sufficient to overcome any likely last-minute mail-in ballots.

What follows are the countywide results for the Circuit and Appellate Courts (subcircuit results will follow in the next post). I have combined City and suburban totals. I have used a calculator and I have my glasses handy; these careful precautions notwithstanding, all errors of addition are mine (click to enlarge or clarify any image):

Appellate Court
Circuit Court (countywide)

In case you were wondering....

The Cook County Clerk did publish am Official List of Write-In Candidates for Suburban Cook County. None were candidates for any judicial vacancy in any party primary.

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Wright leading in 5th Subcircuit race

With 86.38% of the available votes counted, Timothy W. Wright III is holding a 4,000-vote lead over his nearest rival in the four-person race for the Shelley vacancy in the 5th Subcircuit.

Former Judge Jackie Marie Portman-Brown was a candidate in this race. She was defeated for retention in the 2020 general election.

In the race for the Portman-Brown vacancy in the 5th Subcircuit, appointed Judge David L. Kelly still holds a just-better-than 2,000 vote margin over Jenetia Marshall.

Rochford to face Curran for Supreme Court seat?

CapitolFax.com is linking to the Tribune tonight for election returns. And here's a screen grab from the Tribune showing Judge Elizabeth Rochford ahead, as I believe was expected, in her bid for the Democratic nomination for the new Second Judicial District seat on the Illinois Supreme Court. Over 80% of those votes are counted.

More surprising, perhaps, is that former Lake County Sheriff Mark Curran is leading, albeit narrowly, in his bid for the Republican nomination for that seat. Note, however, that only 61% of these votes are shown:

DuPage County was always the 'big dog' in the old 2nd Judicial District; Lake County was always the scrappy little brother. Now Lake County is probably the biggest county in the new judicial district (Kane must come close but I haven't looked it up). So maybe it's not that big a surprise that both candidates for the Supreme Court would come from Lake County. We'll see how it shakes out... tomorrow.

13th Subcircuit - Seyring to face TBA in November. Probably.

Unless you live in the far northwest corner of Cook County, if you took a Republican ballot today, you had no one to vote for in either Appellate Court race, or in any of the 10 countywide races. And only if you live in the far northwest corner of Cook County did you have any judicial candidates to choose from at all: There were three vying for the Republican nomination there.

And it appears that Gary William Seyring bested two challengers to win the Republican nomination for the Groebner vacancy in the 13th Subcircuit. His margin is 1,693 votes, at this point, over Dominic J. Buttitta, Jr. Only six of the 208 precincts in the 13th have yet to report in this race.

So this result should probably hold. But... who knows what is lurking in the postal system?

For the record, there were 18,676 total Republican ballots taken out in this traditionally Republican area.

On the Democractic side, some 25,081 ballots were taken out. And, at this moment, with only six precincts still outstanding, Joe Gump has a seven vote margin over James "Jack" Costello, 10,494 to 10,487.

Yikes.

I will venture a prediction here: Either Costello or Gump will eventually prevail and wind up facing Seyring in November. Probably.

How's that for fearless?

Countywide cliffhanger?

Chicago Ald. Howard B. Brookins, Jr. has a margin of barely 100 votes over Lisa Michelle Taylor in suburban returns in the race for the countywide Brennan vacancy. In City returns, however, with 93.62% of the available votes counted, Brookins trails Taylor by 11,000 votes.

Is this a cliffhanger? In a race with turnout that ranged from dismal to abysmal, and who-knows-how-many votes that may actually be coming back to the election authorities in the mail, it may turn out to be a cliffhanger. Or not.

In the other countywide race that seemed close earlier in the evening, Elizabeth "Beth" Ryan has a 10,000 vote margin in City returns and an almost 15,000 vote margin in the suburbs. Which seems pretty safe.

Close races in the 9th and 11th Subcircuits?

Barry Goldberg has a just-better-than 400 vote margin in City returns in his bid for the Jacobius vacancy in the 9th Subcircuit, but he's ahead by better than 4,500 votes in the suburbs. It looks like this is going to be a tough gap for any of the other three candidates to close.

This 9th Subcircuit race is closer than the other one, where Judge Sanjay Tailor is cruising to a win, but it may not be all that close.

A close race does appear to have occurred in the 11th Subcircuit, where Chicago Ald. Chris Taliaferro has about a 400 vote margin over Aileen Bhandari in City returns (with 98.48% of the available votes counted) but about an 1,800 vote deficit in the suburbs. VBM may well be decisive in this race.

Brad Trowbridge looks like he's won in the 8th Subcircuit

Stephen Swedlow is besting Jennifer Bae by better than 5,000 votes in the race for the Lipscomb vacancy in the 8th Subcircuit. Swedlow seems to have had a lot of backing from the local politicos, so perhaps the margin may be seen as disappointing to some.

But that's silly. All that matters (or should matter) to the candidate is getting one more vote than the next highest finisher.

Bradley R. Trowbridge has a better than 10,000 vote margin over the next closest competitor in the three-way race for the Gordon vacancy in the 8th. Third time may be the charm in his case.

Marcia O'Brien Conway looks like a winner in 7th Subcircuit race

The margin is over 3,000 votes in the suburban returns. But there are more City than suburban precincts in the 7th and her margin is only about 400 votes in the City returns. But 87.17 of the City votes have been counted, and all of the available suburban votes have been tallied, too.

So I won't climb too far out on the limb just yet. But this margin seems healthier than some.

Kantas, Raines-Welch ahead in 4th Subcircuit races

It turns out that the endorsement of the Mayor of Riverside was not decisive in the race for the Rogers vacancy. Shawnte Raines-Welch, the wife of the Speaker of the Illinois House, did not have that endorsement, but she apparently had a lot of others: She has about an 1,800 vote margin over Chloe Georgianna Pedersen, her nearest challenger in this four-person race.

With such a small margin, what may be decisive is VBM returns. I'm not climbing out on any limbs. But 98% of the available votes have been counted.

In the race for the Gavin vacancy, Nick Kantas has a better than 2,220-vote margin over his challenger. Still not climbing out on limbs.

But those are the numbers for now.

Most sitting judges doing well in subcircuit races, but not all

Associate Judge Kerrie Maloney Laytin leads by a wide margin in the race for the Vega vacancy in the 6th Subcircuit. Judge Sanjay Tailor is likewise comfortably ahead in both City and suburban returns for the Cleveland vacancy in the 9th Subcircuit.

Judge David L. Kelly is ahead, too, but by a much narrower margin, in his race for the Portman-Brown vacancy in the 5th Subcircuit. While many other races report 90% or more of the votes counted at this still-early hour, only 79.8% of the votes have been counted in this race. Kelly's margin is only 1,825 votes.
In the 1st Subcircuit, however, Judge John W. Wilson is trailing Maria M. Barlow by 2,600 votes in City returns and another 1,200 in the suburbs.

Barrett apparent winner in 15th, Martinez in the 14th

Bernadette Barrett has coasted to victory in her bid for a 15th Subcircuit vacancy. I hope I've learned my lesson about VBM so I won't try to 'call' races unless it looks really clear. This one looks clear.

The margins are narrower in the contested 14th Subcircuit race. but it appears that Viviana Martinez will defeat both of the other candidates in the race for the Jaglielski vacancy.

There... see? I'm learning.

Donnelly, De La Cruz, and Gudino all leading in their countywide races

In both City and suburban returns.

Michael Weaver is also leading in his three-way race.

So... preliminarily... party slating accounts seems to have carried eight of ten slated candidates to victory.

Starting subcircuits next.