Showing posts with label 2024 November Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2024 November Election. Show all posts

Thursday, March 06, 2025

Dr. Klumpp analyzes spending in 2024 Cook County judicial campaigns

FWIW is once again pleased to present a Guest Post by Albert J. Klumpp, a PhD in public policy analysis with a national reputation for expertise on judicial races. Dr. Klumpp is the author of many articles which have appeared in legal publications in Illinois and nationwide. His article, "California's Judicial Retention Elections: Past, Present, and Future," appeared in the December 2024 issue of the Orange County Lawyer Magazine. Dr. Klumpp has been a generous contributor to FWIW for many years.

by Albert J. Klumpp

To finish my work on the 2024 election cycle, here as promised is a look at the campaign spending numbers for all of Cook County’s judicial candidates. Inevitably there will be a few late-arriving bills that have yet to be reported for general election contests, but otherwise the following figures summarize all of the primary and general election spending reported by the 70 individuals who ran for the various judicial vacancies open last year.

Unfortunately the summary figures aren’t entirely comparable with those of past years because of a lack of competition. Of the 45 vacancies open for election, 25 of them were won by a single candidate who faced no opposition in either stage of election. Meaning, more than one-third of the 70 candidates had no one to campaign against. This kept the aggregate numbers lower than they could have been.

Nonetheless, the candidates reported a total of $7,458,054 in campaign spending. The largest contributor to that figure was an infrequent Illinois Supreme Court vacancy, which saw more than $2 million in spending. Here is a table showing the top fifteen spenders:
Obviously the most notable aspect of this table is the massive spending advantage that Joy Cunningham held over her lone opponent, Jesse Reyes, in the Supreme Court contest. When past figures are adjusted for inflation, Cunningham’s total represents the fifth-highest amount spent among the 46 candidates who have sought Supreme Court vacancies in Cook County since 1980. For readers who are curious, here are the top fifteen:
Cunningham’s large financial advantage was undoubtedly a major factor in her success, but as this table demonstrates, money alone is no guarantee of success. Eight of these 15 candidates were unsuccessful, including two of the top three.

Spending for the lower courts was mostly unexceptional. Celia Gamrath’s reported total of $356,556 was the highest amount spent by any of the six Appellate Court candidates, but two of those candidates faced no opposition. And while it ranks as the eighth-highest total among the 203 Appellate Court candidates since 1980, it is well below the biggest spenders.

Similarly, among Circuit Court candidates there were no extreme spenders as there were in the previous three cycles. For countywide vacancies, the biggest spender was Pablo DeCastro, but his reported total of $185,371 ranks only 38th among countywide candidates since 1980 and can be attributed to the unusual situation (in this election cycle) of facing opponents in both the primary and general elections. And the biggest spender among subcircuit candidates (Paul O’Grady, 15th Subcircuit) ranks only 22nd among sub-county candidates since 1980. (O'Grady was defeated by Luciano Panici, who spent nearly as much.)

But despite the lack of extreme spenders in this cycle, and despite the lesser competitiveness, the aggregate numbers did nothing to change the trend in campaign spending that I have noted in the past, both here in FWIW and in published work. The chart below reports median spending numbers, adjusted for inflation, on a decade-by-decade basis:
The chart shows that spending per candidate has grown steadily since the 1990s despite a gradual decrease in the number of candidates per contest. In fact, it may be that the increase in spending is increasingly discouraging potential candidates. This is a question that I hope to answer in my current research project.

In the meantime, and to conclude, the usual fine print: The amounts reported here come from reviewing every quarterly campaign finance report filed with the Illinois State Board of Elections by every candidate. They include items reported as in-kind contributions, and exclude items that are not directly relevant to the vote-getting objective of the campaign (for instance, loan repayments that are technically required to be reported as expenditures). All pre-2024 totals were adjusted for inflation using basic Consumer Price Index data.

Friday, November 15, 2024

Too good to be entirely true: Cook County Jail detainees did not support Trump (or the retention judges) as much as we thought...

The news that President-Elect Donald Trump got a plurality of the votes cast in the precinct wherein the Cook County Jail is located got a lot of traction. FWIW jumped on the bandwagon, too, running a piece about that and then (staying on brand) looking at the judicial retention results reported in that precinct.

That's a map of the 19th precinct of the 24th Ward at the top of this piece. And it does indeed contain the Cook County Jail. But the boundaries are not coextensive.

My second look at this story was prompted by a question left in the comment queue. Last Friday night a sharp-eyed reader asked, "Hmm. Don't jail detainees vote absentee out of their home ward/suburb, therefore their totals would be included in those totals and not the 19th precinct of the 24th Ward???"

I didn't publish the comment until today, as I was preparing this article.

I didn't publish the comment because I didn't know the answer. I knew detainees voted from the jail. I knew Injustice Watch made a point of distributing its voter guide at the jail.

But that didn't answer the question. Sophia Ansari, Director of Public Relations and Communications for the Cook County Sheriff, explained that the FWIW reader had the gist of it: Ansari wrote FWIW that "individuals in custody vote based on their home addresses. One thing to clarify is that individuals in custody who are registered to vote in Cook County are voting in person, as the jail is an early voting polling place." So those votes would not have been counted in the 19th Precinct of the 24th Ward.

Moreover, Max Bever, the Director of Communications for the Chicago Board of Elections, confirmed that the Election Day polling place for the 19th Precinct of the 24th Ward is at Spry School, located on South Marshall Blvd. -- not in the jail. Jail detainees would not have been voting at the school.

But it is not entirely fake news: Bever told FWIW in an email, "1,479 Chicago voters [cast] a ballot from Cook County Jail for the November 5, 2024 General Election." The jail was an early voting site, and, according to Bever, there were "two weekends of Early Voting for Pre-Trial Detainees, held on Saturday, October 19; Sunday, October 20; Saturday, October 26; and Sunday, October 27." But 416 of the detainees "used Same Day Registration," Bever said, "which often indicates they used the jail as their address to vote." Therefore, Bever concluded, "it would be more accurate to say that some Pre-Trial Detainees’ ballots would be cast within the 19th Precinct of the 24th Ward, while other voters were previously registered elsewhere, or could provide proof of ID for an address outside the precinct for registration."

So the story is still that Trump carried the precinct in which Cook County Jail is located... but most of the votes counted there were not cast by detainees.... The story is not quite as intriguing as it may have first seemed.

Hat Tip to the Anonymous FWIW reader (why are they always anonymous?) who gently nudged me down the path of enlightenment.

Friday, November 08, 2024

Trump won the Cook County Jail vote. How do you think the judges fared there?

I got the story from Rich Miller's Capitol Fax. He got it from a Threads post by chi_urbanist. Here's the graphic:
Quoting Miller now, "Trump won the 19th Precinct in the 24th Ward 594-572 (49%-47%), with 47 people voting for RFK, Jr. Four years ago, Joe Biden won that precinct with 96 percent of the vote, to Trump’s 3."

Why? Who knows? Maybe, as the saying goes, game recognizes game.

Be honest, now: You did not see that coming, did you?

Neither did I.

But it got me wondering: What did the jail population think of the judges on the retention ballot?

My hypothesis, going in, was that prisoners might have little love for the judges who will preside over their cases. I rather expected, in fact, that the detainees might agree -- on this one point at least -- with some of the police officers who put them there. Remember, Second City Cop always recommends a "No" vote on every retention judge.

What would you guess?

I'll pause here while you think about it... scroll down when you're ready... and no cheating!

.

.

.

.

.

.

As it turns out, if the fate of the retention judges was decided by the inmates' votes alone, only 23 out of the 75 Circuit Court judges for whom votes were actually counted would have been retained. Both of the Appellate Court justices would have been retained.

I was a little surprised that prisoners would give better than 60% "Yes" votes to so many. I don't know that I could be so generous were I incarcerated.

And the lowest favorable vote was just below 50% -- 49.95% for a female judge married to a former CPD lieutenant -- meaning that, in every case but that one, more than half the inmates voted to approve each and every judge for a new term.

Now the high was only 67%, and I'm sure some might think that this vote must be for someone sitting in the Criminal Division with a turn-'em-all-loose reputation, right? But, in actual fact, the judge who got the most favorable rating from the jail inmates is assigned to the Domestic Relations Division at the Daley Center. Sixteen of the 23 judges getting better than 60% "Yes" votes out of the jail precinct were female.

In the one contested countywide judicial vote, inmates chose Democratic candidate Pablo deCastro over Republican Tien H. Glaub by a margin of 72.2 to 27.8%.

I don't pretend to be able to discern any 'big picture' statement from these returns. Don't jump to conclusions, perhaps, but that's not very original. Maybe someone else can explain....

Tuesday, November 05, 2024

deCastro defeats Glaub in the only contested countywide judicial race

Tien H. Glaub, the only Republican candidate to run for a countywide Circuit Court seat is down to Judge Pablo F. deCastro by 270,000 votes Citywide (with about two-thirds of the votes counted) and by another 210,000 or so votes, according to suburban tallies, with about 93% of the votes counted there.

The Illinois Supreme Court appointed deCastro to the countywide Flannery vacancy this past April. At the time, he had no Republican opponent. Glaub did not run in the Republican primary; she filed for the vacancy in June.

Democratic sweep in contested judicial subcircuit elections

With over 90% of the votes already counted, 90 minutes after the polls closed, it appears that the Democratic nominees in the four contested subcircuit elections have prevailed.

The closest race is in the 18th Subcircuit, but John Hock is ahead of Lynn Terese Palac by over 4,000 votes with 94% of the votes counted (136 of 144 precincts reporting):

The margins are even larger in the three 12th Subcircuit races, where Alon Stein appears to have bested Maria McCarthy, Frank J. Andreou holds a better-than-9,000 vote margin over Pamela Curran Smith, and James "Jack" Costello is up by more than 12,000 votes over Matthew Taylor:

Only five precincts are unaccounted for in this report from the Cook County Clerk's website.

Both the 12th and 18th Subcircuits are located entirely outside the City of Chicago.

Monday, November 04, 2024

Resources for Cook County judicial voters

Bumped up for greater visibility and revised 11/4

Cook County voters will have a say in the election of five new judges this November, one countywide, three in the north suburban 12th subciruit, and one in the suburban 18th subcircuit. (Scroll down for links on specific contested races.)

Technically, there are many more Cook County judicial vacancies that will be filled when the results of this election are certified, but there are no contests for any of these vacancies. All of these, including a new jusitice of the Illinois Supreme Court and four justices of the Illinois Appellate Court, were chosen by voters in the Democratic Primary in March and are now running unopposed.

But Cook County judicial voters do get to determine whether 78 local jurists get to remain on the bench. Two Appellate Court justices are seeking new 10-year terms and 76 Circuit Court judges are asking voters to retain them for new 6-year terms. (Well... 75, actually, but there are 76 names on the ballot. Let's not confuse things more than we have to.)

That's a lot of judges.

Voters may glaze over, just a bit, at the 'bedsheet ballot' for retention judges. If you are one of these, allow me to let you in on a deep, dark secret: We lawyers tend to glaze over on the retention ballot, too.

Here's why: The busiest lawyer will not have appeared before every retention judge. Our lawyers, our judges, and our courts are too specialized in Cook County for that to ever happen. And even if the busiest lawyer has appeared before many, he or she will have appeared before some on too few occasions to form any reasonable opinion of those judges' fitness for another term.

To responsibly exercise our franchise, even us lawyers need help. We rely on our brothers and sisters on the many bar association Judicial Evaluation Committees to gather information and form opinions on those judges we do not ourselves know.

The Chicago Bar Association and the 13 bar groups that together comprise the Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening conduct separate investigations on retention judges, including contacting attorneys that the judges have identified as appearing before them. The Alliance groups conduct joint investigations and hearings, but each bar group forms, and expresses, its own opinion about each judge. Some bar groups provide written explanations of their findings; most do not. While the bar groups consider the same information, not all always reach the same conclusions about the merits of particular judges.

Thus, particularly where there are differences of opinion among the bar groups, lawyers, just like non-lawyer voters, have to make up their own minds.

And lawyers, just like everyone else, have to cast about for other sources of information that may be persuasive. (Gosh, I hope I won't get in trouble with the Guild for spilling these secrets....)

One type of resource that a lot of us rely on -- besides asking our friends who have practices that bring them before judges we don't usually get to see -- or the Retention Judges' own website -- are the opinions of non-lawyers that spend a lot of time in courtrooms -- think police and reporters.

This doesn't mean we necessarily agree with what these worthies may think -- I am certain that some people scour the FOP endorsements carefully to make sure they don't accidentally vote for someone that the police union likes. On the other hand, other people may carefully consider the Girl, I Guess Guide to make certain that they don't vote for someone that the guide endorses. People are often contrary critters. (And what happens when the FOP and the Girl, I Guess Guide agree that a particular candidate is good... or bad... is there any danger of explosion?)

The interactive Injustice Watch Check Your Judges Guide is a valuable and increasingly influential resource for voters -- lawyers included -- seeking information in judicial elections. This year, just as the bar groups were releasing, or about to release, their retention candidate evaluations, On October 2, Injustice Watch published a story about two retention candidates, Judges Shannon O'Malley and E. Kenneth Wright, Jr., "Two Cook County judges claim homestead exemptions in Will County." The story, by Kelly Garcia and David Jackson, makes the case that neither Judge O'Malley nor Judge Wright actually live in Cook County. (My column about the controversy is here, if you're interested.)

The story threw a monkey wrench into the plans of the various JECs. The CBA pulled its initial favorable ratings of Wright and O'Malley; it has since issued a negative rating on O'Malley (story to come). The Injustice Watch disclosures were cited in the narrative evaluations issued by the Chicago Council of Lawyers and the Illinois State (links follow).

Injustice Watch is not the only publication regularly covering the courts. The focus of CWBChicago's reporting is also on the criminal courts.

This year, for the first time, CWBChicago made a specific endorsement in a retention race (asking for a 'no' vote on the retention of Judge Carol Howard). Voters may find this collection of CWBChicago articles helpful in evaluating other judges on the retention ballot.

Now here's where things get a bit circular. Injustice Watch reports all the bar ratings. FWIW reports all the bar ratings. VoteForJudges.org reports all the bar ratings. We all link to each other. Charlie Meyerson's Chicago Public Square Voter Guide Guide (not a typo - it's a guide to voter guides) also links to bar recommendations, Injustice Watch, and Girl, I Guess.

Visit some or all of these to reassure yourself that you've got all the relevant and available information... but, in addition, check out these prior FWIW posts which you may also find useful:
Prior FWIW articles on the 2024 Retention Election:

Prior FWIW articles on 2024 contested Cook County judicial races

Why you might want to consider voting the ballot from the bottom up

Yes, I know: All eyes are supposed to be on Pennsylvania now, and Michigan, and Nevada and North Carolina, too. Maybe even Iowa and Arizona. I don't know who could actually keep their eyes on all those widely-scattered places, all at the same time. Marty Feldman perhaps?

But, as a practical matter, the person ultimately elected as POTUS will have far less actual influence in most of our lives than the persons we are about to elect (or retain) as judges, or the persons we will elect to the General Assembly or as members of the Chicago School Board.

Look at it this way: You will probably never get invited to a State Dinner at the White House, but you may get a speeding ticket. One of your wayward relations may get pinched for vandalism. Someone may fall on your sidewalk and sue you; you will certainly pay property taxes. That was why the late Avy Meyers used to say it was so important to pay attention to the races at the bottom of the ballot, to the point of voting the ballot from the bottom up. I suggest this idea is equally valid today as it was in Avy's lifetime.

I've recently read and re-Tweeted a couple of long threads on X about "subsidiarity," a nice 25-cent word that the Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines as "a principle in social organization holding that functions which are performed effectively by subordinate or local organizations belong more properly to them than to a dominant central organization." In other words, it is a principle which suggests that decision making is best done on the most local level possible. Apparently (and maybe all of you knew this already, but I didn't) "subsidiarity" has a long, important history in Catholic social teaching, too.

There weren't many Catholics in America at the time of the Revolution, but the patriots' rallying cry of "No Taxation Without Representation" sounds to me like an application of this principle of subsidiarity: Each of the Colonies had their own legislatures to raise revenues for local needs; but the Colonies objected vociferously, and, ultimately, violently, to decisions about their defense and boundaries and obligations being made in London where the Colonists had only lobbyists to advance their interests. (Ben Franklin worked in London for many years as an agent of several Colonies, for example.)

And, if decisions are best taken at the most local level possible, voters should naturally be more concerned with their local leaders that with those who would strut and fret upon the national stage. That sounds suspiciously like what Avy Meyers used to say and, of course, Avy wasn't Catholic either.

If we were more focused on selecting the best possible candidates on the local level, maybe we'd have better candidates to choose from at higher rungs on the cursus honorum as well.

I can dream, can't I?

Wednesday, October 16, 2024

Organizing the Data: Countywide Flannery vacancy

There are only five judicial vacancies on the Cook County ballot this November in which voters have any choice whatsoever. All of the other races were decided in the March Democratic primary. Four of the contested races are in the 12th and 18th Subcircuits. This post looks at the candidates for the only contested countywide vacancy.

We didn't know that this would be a contested vacancy during the primary season. The Republican candidate was appointed by the Republican party and filed paperwork on June 3. There were no objections filed against the candidate.

Candidates are listed in punch number order. This year, that means the Democratic candidate is listed before the Republican candidate.

This post may be updated with new, additional, or corrected information, as it becomes available.

One final note: Each candidate may have endorsements from persons or groups not shown below. These are typically found on the candidate's websites. FWIW only publishes endorsements that it can independently verify.


Pablo F. deCastro - #76


Campaign Website

Pablo F. deCastro: In his own words

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Pursuant to section 34 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, The Executive Committee has voted to issue a “Qualified” rating for Pablo F. DeCastro’s current Circuit Court Judge candidacy.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Pablo F. deCastro was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 1994. Since 2012, he has been a solo practitioner in the Law offices of Pablo deCastro, where he focuses on criminal defense. He also handled criminal defense cases as a partner at Rascia and deCastro (2007-2012) and as an associate attorney at Serpico, Novelle, Petrosino and Rascia (2000-2012). Previously (1994-2000), he had been an Assistant Public Defender in the Office of the Cook County Public Defender. He is a member of numerous bar associations and legal societies, including the American Bar Association, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Criminal Justice Act Panel, and the Northern District of Illinois Criminal Justice Act Panel, where he serves on the Attorney Selection Panel.

Mr. deCastro is considered to have good legal ability and to be a zealous advocate for his clients. He is praised for his temperament and is active in pro bono matters. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. Pablo deCastro has been licensed since 1994. Since 2012 he has been a sole practitioner focusing on criminal defense. From 1994-2000 he was an assistant public defender, and before opening his own practice he was in the private sector also focusing on criminal defense. He has substantial criminal jury trial experience and civil bench trials as well as federal experience. He teaches at the University of Chicago Law School Intensive Trial Practice program, is a member of several bar associations, and currently serves on the Panel Attorney Selection Committee for the Federal Defender’s Office Panel Attorney Program.

Respondents generally described him as being very smart and capable, a zealous advocate who knows the rules of evidence. He is known to be very committed to diversity, professional and calm. ISBA finds Pablo F. deCastro qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qaulified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements
Chicago Federation of Labor
AMVOTE PAC
Teamsters Joint Council No. 25
Teamsters Local 700
IBEW Local 134
IUOE Local 399
Girl, I Guess
Personal PAC
------------------------------------------------------

Tien H. Glaub - #76


Campaign Website


The Chicago Bar Association says:
Pursuant to section 34, rule 27.4 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, The Executive Committee has voted that Tien H. Glaub’s prior finding of NOT RECOMMENDED shall stand.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Tien H. Glaub did not participate in the judicial evaluation. The Council finds her Not Recommended
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Not Recommended

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Not Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Not Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Not Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Not Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Not Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Not Recommended

Friday, October 04, 2024

October 24 fundraiser for Judge de Castro

It wasn't supposed to be this way. Pablo de Castro won his Democratic primary race this past March and then, in April, since he (and all countywide Cook County judicial candidates) had no Republican opposition, the Illinois Supreme Court gave de Castro an early start on his judicial career.

Now, however, de Castro finds that he is not unopposed after all.

Thus, Judge de Castro's supporters are planning a fundraiser for his fall campaign. The event is set for Thursday, October 24, starting at 7:00 p.m., at Sketchbook Brewing Co., 4901 Main St., Skokie. Jazz singer and songwriter Kurt Elling will perform.

Tickets are $150 each. Sponsorships are available (Friend - $250, Supporter - $500, Host - $1,000). Tickets are available at this DemocracyEngine link on the candidate's website. And, who knows? Perhaps that QR code in the graphic above may also do something, for those who know how to work such things....

Thursday, October 03, 2024

Seventy-seven of 78 Cook County jurists recommended for retention by the Chicago Bar Association

Updated 10/4/24 after CBA's release of explanation for its recommendation regarding Judge Marino

The Chicago Bar Association released its "Judge Smart" Guide for the upcoming election.

The headline here has the main story: The CBA has recommended retention for 77 of the 78 Cook County jurists seeking new terms. That number includes both of the Appellate Court justices seeking retention, as well as 75 out of the 76 Circuit Court judges seeking new six-year terms. The only judge not recommended for retention was Judge Lisa Ann Marino.

The CBA JEC has released the following explanation of its rating regarding Judge Marino:
Judge Lisa Marino has been found “Not Recommended” for retention as a Circuit Court. Judge Marino was admitted to practice in 1988 and was elected as a judge in 2012. She has been sitting in the First Municipal District, Housing Section, since 2016. Significant concerns about Judge Marino’s knowledge of the law, temperament, and diligence resulted in the “Not Recommended” finding.
The CBA did not recommend Marino for retention in 2018; as in 2024, in 2018 Marino was the only retention judge receiving a 'not recommended' rating from the CBA. Marino's biography on the Cook County Retention Judges website correctly notes that the CBA did rate Marino qualified when she was elected to the bench in 2012.

The CBA no longer explains its reasons for rating retention judges qualified.

The CBA "Judge Smart" Guide also discloses the CBA's rating for Republican countywide candidate Tien H. Glaub. (Glaub was not a candidate in the Republican primary and was not therefore not evaluated at that time.) But Glaub did file for associate judge in 2021, and the CBA did issue an unfavorable rating then. That rating was not changed for this election:
Pursuant to section 34, rule 27.4 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, The Executive Committee has voted that Tien H. Glaub’s prior finding of NOT RECOMMENDED shall stand.
FWIW has not yet done an Organizing the Data post on the now-contested countywide Flannery vacancy, pending the release of all bar evaluations of Glaub's candidacy.

Voters can read the CBA's evaluations for all candidates on the November ballot, but with the exception of the race for the Flannery vacancy and four suburban subcircuit races, all judicial elections on the November ballot in Cook County are uncontested.

FWIW has published Organizing the Data posts in those four subcircuit races. These posts contain the CBA's explanation of its ratings of the competing candidates. These posts may be found at these links:

Thursday, September 26, 2024

CBA issues updated ratings for 12th Subcircuit candidates

FWIW has confirmed this morning that the Chicago Bar Association has found 12th Subcircuit candidate Pamela Curran Smith (pictured at left) "Qualified" in her bid for the Quinn vacancy.

My earlier post profiling the Quinn vacancy has been updated accordingly.

Readers scrolling to the comments in the linked post will see that that candidate called me out for publishing the CBA's "not recommended" rating; she expressly denied that she "declined to participate" in the CBA's screening process. I had relied on the rating issued with the CBA's Voters' Guide for the March 2024 primary in preparing my post.

In my experience, bar ratings, once issued (and once the regular appeal process has been exhausted), do not change between the primary and general elections. I can recall an instance where a candidate rating was withdrawn (only to be reinstated later) -- but, until now, I can not recall a single instance where this kind of change has occurred.

The operative words in the preceding sentence are "until now."

In the course of investigating the question this morning I learned, from a reliable CBA source, that there were a few candidates who received "Not Recommended" ratings during the primary season because "we did not receive their completed questionnaires in time to conduct an investigation. Part of this turned out to not be completely their fault and we decided in all fairness to allow them to submit their questionnaires and go through our process."

Ms. Smith was one of the candidates who was allowed to proceed with the screening process after this determination was made.

The CBA also today provided FWIW with an updated "Qualified" letter to 12th Subcircuit candidate Alon Stein (Dickler vacancy). He was rated "Qualfied" for the primary as well, and, as I had done with Ms. Smith, I had used the language from the CBA's primary voters' guide in my Organizing the Data post. However, since the language of the CBA's explanation of its rating has changed, I have updated that post as well, to reflect the CBA's current language.

Finally, the CBA has advised FWIW that its general election voters guide (the Smart Guide) should be available soon. FWIW will have that guide when available.

Tuesday, September 24, 2024

Organizing the Data: 18th Subcircuit - Converted from Associate Judgeship of Linn

There are only five judicial vacancies on the Cook County ballot this November in which voters have any choice whatsoever. All of the other races were decided in the March Democratic primary. One of these contested races is in the new northwest suburban 18th Subcircuit. This post looks at the candidates for that vacancy.

Candidates are listed in punch number order. This year, that means the Democratic candidate is listed before the Republican candidate.

This post may be updated with new, additional, or corrected information, as it becomes available.

One final note: Each candidate may have endorsements from persons or groups not shown below. These are typically found on the candidate's websites. FWIW only publishes endorsements that it can independently verify.


John Hock - #92

Campaign Website

John Hock: In his own words

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
John Hock is "Qualified" for the office of Circuit Judge. Mr. Hock was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2009. He is an Assistant State's Attorney for Cook County currently working on post-conviction matters. He previously served as a public defender. Mr. Hock is well regarded by his peers and judges before whom he has appeared for his even temperament, integrity, and work ethic.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
John Hock was admitted to the Florida bar in 2007. He has been with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office since 2022 and is assigned to the Special Litigation Unit where he manages a caseload of serious felony cases. He did civil litigation in Florida from 2007 to 2009. He then worked until 2011 for the Will County Public Defender’s Office. From 2011 to 2013, he worked for a private law firm doing civil litigation, and from 2013 to 2022 he worked for the Lake County Public Defender’s Office. He is considered to have good legal ability. He has substantial litigation experience in both civil and criminal law matters. He is reported to have a good temperament. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. John Hock was admitted to the Illinois bar in 2009 and was admitted to practice in Florida in 2007. He was employed with a civil litigation firm in Florida until 2009, when he obtained his Illinois license and started with the Will County Public Defender. After working for Cremer Law focusing on commercial and international litigation for two years, he spent nine years with the Lake County Public Defender. Since 2022 he has been an assistant state’s attorney with Cook County, focusing on post-conviction matters in the Special Litigation Unit. He has been a presenter on legal topics and a committee member for the Northwest Suburban Bar Association.

Attorneys consider him to be an expert in his field of prisoner petitions. He handles all cases without bias, follows the law, and is diligent in his work. ISBA finds John Hock qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Not Evaluated (through no fault of candidate)

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements
Chicago Federation of Labor
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399
Teamsters Joint Council No. 25
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 134
Teamsters Local 700
------------------------------------------------------

Lynn Terese Palac - #93


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Lynn Palac is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Palac was admitted to practice law in 1999. Ms. Palac has been practicing law in Cook County for 25 years and has significant litigation and trial experience, primarily in criminal cases. Ms. Palac is well regarded by judges and opposing attorneys for her legal knowledge, pleasant demeanor, and work ethic. She is also praised for her community involvement.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Lynn T. Palac was admitted to practice in 1999 and served as an Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney for 10 years before she left that office to do criminal defense work. She also is employed by Catholic Charities where she provides training in domestic violence and domestic relations cases.

Lynn T. Palec is considered to have good legal ability and temperament. She is praised for her litigation skills. The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Ms. Lynn Terese Palac has been licensed since 1999. After spending ten years as an Assistant State’s Attorney, she worked with several firms focusing on criminal, traffic and family law, before opening her own practice in 2015. She is also a Supervising Attorney for Catholic Charities Legal Assistance, where she trains other attorneys and represents clients of Catholic Charities, mostly in the domestic violence area. She is a member of several bar associations and has been Chair of the Northwest Suburban Bar Criminal Law Committee.

While attorneys considered her to be fair, punctual and a hard worker, concerns were raised about the depth and breadth of her litigation experience since leaving the State’s Attorney’s Office in 2009. ISBA finds Lynn T. Palac not qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Organizing the Data: 12th Subcircuit - Schleifer vacancy

There are only five judicial vacancies on the Cook County ballot this November in which voters have any choice whatsoever. All of the other races were decided in the March Democratic primary. Three of these contested races are in the north suburban 12th Subcircuit. This post looks at the candidates for the Schleifer vacancy in that 12th Subcircuit.

Candidates are listed in punch number order. This year, that means the Democratic candidate is listed before the Republican candidate.

This post may be updated with new, additional, or corrected information, as it becomes available.

One final note: Each candidate may have endorsements from persons or groups not shown below. These are typically found on the candidate's websites. FWIW only publishes endorsements that it can independently verify.


James "Jack" Costello - #95


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
James "Jack" Costello is "Qualified" to serve as a Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Costello was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2007 and has been an Assistant Cook County State's Attorney since that time. Mr. Costello has significant trial experience and is well-regarded for his diligence, legal ability and experience, and excellent demeanor.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
James Costello was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 2007. He has spent his career as an Assistant State’s Attorney in the Cook County State’s Attorney Office, where since 2019 he has served in the Special Prosecutions Bureau, Public Corruption and Financial Crimes Unit (he is currently First Chair). He has also served in the Felony Trial Division (2016-2019), the Felony Review and Preliminary Hearings Unit (2013-2016), the Misdemeanors/Traffic/Preliminary Hearings Units at the Markham courthouse (2009-2013), and Criminal Appeals in the Daley Center (2007-2009).

Mr. Costello is considered to have good legal ability and is especially praised for his temperament. He is reported to be knowledgeable and fair with lawyers and litigants. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. James Costello has been licensed since 2007. He is a career prosecutor currently assigned to the Public Corruption/Financial Crimes Unit; before his assignment there in 2019, he worked in the Felony Trial Division, Misdemeanor/Traffic, and Appeals. He has been a speaker and guest lecturer at both law schools and high schools and coached mock trial teams. He is a board Member of the Arlington Heights Historical Society.

Mr. Costello has substantial jury and bench trial experience in criminal matters, including in complex cases. Attorneys praised his legal skills and ability, and analytical skills. He is reported to be high integrity, even keeled and fair. ISBA finds James Costello qualified for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Not Evaluated (through no fault of candidate)

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements
Chicago Federation of Labor
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399
Teamsters Joint Council No. 25
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 134
Teamsters Local 700
------------------------------------------------------

Matthew Taylor - #96


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Matthew Taylor is “Not Recommended” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Taylor was admitted to practice law in 2004. His practice includes criminal law, real estate law and estate planning. Although Mr. Taylor has been practicing law for 19 years, the scope of his practice and court experience is limited. At this point in his career, Mr. Taylor does not possess the requisite depth and breadth of legal experience to effectively serve as a judge.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Matthew Jay Taylor was admitted to practice in 2004 and has always practiced as a sole practitioner. He was a suburban police officer for 10 years prior to becoming a lawyer and currently works at the College of DuPage Suburban Law Enforcement Academy. He is the village prosecutor for 3 municipalities. His law practice includes real estate, probate, misdemeanor defense, child custody issues, and work in the Chancery Division of the Circuit Court.

Mr. Taylor is considered to have good legal ability and is reported to have good temperament. He is praised for his knowledge of the law and for always being prepared. He has substantial litigation experience in both civil and criminal law matters. He is a well respected practitioner. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. Matthew Taylor has been licensed in Illinois since 2004. While he has always been a sole practitioner, focusing on misdemeanor criminal and traffic cases, estate and probate matters, and real estate matters, he was a full-time Palatine police officer until he retired from the department in 2017. He is currently the village prosecutor for Palatine and continues to teach at the Suburban Law Enforcement Academy. He has bench trial experience, mainly in municipal and misdemeanor matters, but no jury trials. He is a member of various bar associations and has been a coach for the York High School mock trial team, as well as being involved in other community and charitable activities.

Attorneys did report that he has good knowledge of the law and is considered to be sensitive to diversity with high character and integrity. Though concerns were raised over the depth and breadth of his entire legal experience, he is well respected by the judiciary, his peers and his opponents and is known for his handle situations with grace and decency. ISBA finds Matthew Taylor qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Not Evaluated (through no fault of the candidate)

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Not Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Not Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Not Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Organizing the Data: 12th Subcircuit - Quinn vacancy

Updated 10/15/24 to correct FWIW error on Frank Andreou's Decalogue rating
Updated 9/26/24 with corrected CBA rating on Pamela Curran Smith

There are only five judicial vacancies on the Cook County ballot this November in which voters have any choice whatsoever. All of the other races were decided in the March Democratic primary. Three of these contested races are in the north suburban 12th Subcircuit. This post looks at the candidates for the Quinn vacancy in that 12th Subcircuit.

Candidates are listed in punch number order. This year, that means the Democratic candidate is listed before the Republican candidate.

This post may be updated with new, additional, or corrected information, as it becomes available.

One final note: Each candidate may have endorsements from persons or groups not shown below. These are typically found on the candidate's websites. FWIW only publishes endorsements that it can independently verify.


Frank J. Andreou - #93


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Pursuant to section 34 of The Chicago Bar Association’s Judicial Evaluation Committee’s Governing Resolution, The Executive Committee has voted to issue a “Qualified” rating for Frank J. Andreou’s current Circuit Court Judge candidacy.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Judge Frank Andreou was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 1995. He currently presides over Calendar D (motion call) in the Law Division of the Cook County Circuit Court where he hears cases involving commercial litigation, medical and professional malpractice, toxic tort, product liability, auto liability, defamation, and other cases. He previously handled traffic and misdemeanor cases before moving to the Law Division. Prior being sworn in as an Associate Judge in January 2020, he worked in private practice for 20 years and for the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office from 1995-1999.

Judge Andreou is considered to have good legal ability and is praised for his ability to have a thorough grasp of the issues being argued before him. He is praised for his fairness and his professional temperament. He is also reported to be punctual and always prepared. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Hon. Frank J. Andreou has been licensed in Illinois since 1995. In December 2019 he was selected as an associate judge first sitting in the Traffic Division and the Second Municipal District (Skokie). Since July 2023 he has been assigned to the Law Division – Motion Section. Prior to his ascension to the bench, he had been in private practice both on his own and with a firm, with substantial jury, bench, and appellate experience. He is a board member for the Illinois Judges Association and the North Suburban Bar Association, and Second Vice President of the Hellenic Bar Association, as well as being a member of other bar associations. He has also served on the District 27 School Board.

Attorneys highly praised his legal knowledge and ability, stating that his rulings were well-reasoned and describing his grasp of fact and law as amazing. Additionally, they were all positive about his integrity, temperament, and diligence. ISBA finds Judge Frank J. Andreou highly qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Highly Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Highly Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements
Chicago Federation of Labor
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399
Teamsters Joint Council No. 25
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 134
Teamsters Local 700
United Hellenic Voters of America
------------------------------------------------------

Pamela Curran Smith - #94


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Pamela Curran Smith is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. Smith was admitted to practice law in Illinois in 2006. Ms. Smith is in private practice and has a wide range of practice experience. She is well-regarded for her legal experience and knowledge, high integrity, and good communication skills. Ms. Smith has the requisite experience to serve as a Circuit Court Judge.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Pamela Curran Smith was admitted to practice in 2006. She is a partner with a small law firm doing criminal defense and personal injury litigation. She has substantial litigation experience. She is considered to have good legal ability, and is praised for her litigation skills. She is reported to have a good temperament. The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Ms. Pamela Curran Smith has been licensed in Illinois since 2006. Since then, she has been employed, and is now a partner, at the Law Offices of Sam Amirante and Associates, with a focus on criminal defense, tort and civil litigation. She has limited criminal jury trial experience and substantial criminal bench trial experience, including in complex matters. She is a member of various bar associations and serves as a committee chair with the Northwest Suburban Bar Association.

Attorneys reported that she possesses a thorough understanding of the legal process and is always ready and prepared, also that she treats all with respect, is professional and has high integrity. ISBA finds Pamela Curran Smith qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Organizing the Data: 12th Subcircuit - Dickler vacancy

Updated 9/26/24 to reflect amended wording in CBA rating for Alon Stein

There are only five judicial vacancies on the Cook County ballot this November in which voters have any choice whatsoever. All of the other races were decided in the March Democratic primary. Three of these contested races are in the north suburban 12th Subcircuit. This post looks at the candidates for the Dickler vacancy in that 12th Subcircuit.

Candidates are listed in punch number order. This year, that means the Democratic candidate is listed before the Republican candidate.

This post may be updated with new, additional, or corrected information, as it becomes available.

One final note: Each candidate may have endorsements from persons or groups not shown below. These are typically found on the candidate's websites. FWIW only publishes endorsements that it can independently verify.


Alon Stein - #91


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Alon Stein is “Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Stein was admitted to practice law in 2002 and is currently in private practice. He has experience in a wide variety of legal matters in numerous jurisdictions. The candidate is well-regarded for his significant trial experience, fine demeanor and excellent temperament.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Alon Stein was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 2002. Since 2013, he has been the Owner and Managing Attorney of Stein Legal Offices, where he focuses on commercial litigation but also handles constitutional matters and employment/wages litigation. Previously, he handled civil litigation, commercial litigation, and appeals as Of Counsel (2013-2017) for The Nathanson Law Firm and as an Associate (2004-2013) and Of Counsel (2013-2015) for Kamensky Rubinstein Hochman & Delott, LLP. From 2002 to 2004, he was an Associate at Blau & Bonavich, where he represented customers suing their brokers in arbitration and plaintiffs in employment actions. He is a member of several bar associations, including the Illinois State Bar Association and the Chicago Bar Association.

Mr. Stein is considered to have good legal ability. He has substantial litigation experience in more complex matters in both state courts and before administrative agencies. He is praised for his litigation skills and for his diligence. The Council finds him Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Mr. Alon Stein has been licensed since 2002. Since 2013 he has been the owner of Stein Law Offices focusing on commercial litigation and representation of small to mid-sized businesses. Prior to that, he worked for Kamensky Rubinstein Hochman & Delott, again handing mostly commercial litigation for healthcare practices. He has litigated in federal court as well as neighboring counties and Wisconsin and has served as arbitrator for Cook County. He has written and spoken on legal topics, is a current officer of the Advocates Society, an Assembly Member to the Illinois State Bar Association, and on the Board of Managers for the Decalogue Society.

Attorneys gave positive feedback on his legal knowledge and litigation ability, stating that he has a high degree of knowledge and is a great advocate. He is courteous and respectful to all, with high integrity and diligence. ISBA finds Alon Stein qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Endorsements
Chicago Federation of Labor
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399
Teamsters Joint Council No. 25
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 134
Teamsters Local 700
United Hellenic Voters of America
------------------------------------------------------

Maria McCarthy - #92


Campaign Website

Bar Association Evaluation Narratives

The Chicago Bar Association says:
Maria McCarthy is “Highly Qualified” for the office of Circuit Court Judge. Ms. McCarthy was admitted to practice law in 1989. Ms. McCarthy served as a Cook County Assistant State’s Attorney for nearly 20 years, where she had more than 65 jury trials, 500 bench trials, and handled 25 appeals. After retiring from the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, she served for two years as the First Assistant to the Winnebago County State’s Attorney. Currently, Ms. McCarthy has her own law firm handling criminal matters. Additionally, for nearly 20 years, she has taught trial advocacy at two law schools, criminal law and procedure at a community college, and constitutional law to police officers. Ms. McCarthy is highly regarded for her knowledge of the law.
The Chicago Council of Lawyers says:
Maria McCarthy worked early in her career for Freeborn & Peters in Chicago where she defended companies in civil litigation. But she worked as an assistant state’s attorney in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office for 30 years. From 2009 to 2019, she was Supervisor of the Third Municipal District. Prior to holding that position, she was the Supervisor of the Homicide/Sex Unit in Chicago, the Supervisor of the Domestic Violence Division and was a Deputy Supervisor in the Traffic Division. She subsequently worked as the First Assistant in the Winnebago County State’s Attorney’s Office, where she supervised the Criminal and Civil Bureaus. In 2022, she was appointed Special Prosecutor in murder cases that are pending in Will County.

Maria McCarthy is considered to have good legal ability with substantial litigation experience in both criminal and civil matters. She is reported to have a very good temperament and is praised for her litigation skills. The Council finds her Qualified for the Circuit Court.
The Illinois State Bar Association says:
Ms. Maria McCarthy has been licensed since 1989. Since March 2022, she has been a partner in the firm of McCarthy & Valentini, where her current focus is her appointment as Special Prosecutor and Assistant Special Prosecutor on some criminal post-trial cases pending in Will County. Prior to that, she had been a career prosecutor in Cook County where she rose to be Supervisor of the Third Municipal District (Rolling Meadows) until 2019, when she left, and subsequently became First Assistant at the Winnebago County State’s Attorney office. She has extensive criminal jury and bench trial experience. She has been a speaker and panelist on legal issues and an Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy at Northwestern University School of Law and the John Marshall Law School, now known as the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law. She is a member of various bar associations and was the recipient of the Scales of Justice Award in 2019 from the Northwest Suburban Bar Association.

She is considered to have good ability and knowledge of the law by the attorneys contacted during the investigation, with a good temperament and character. ISBA finds Maria McCarthy qualified to be elected to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Other Bar Association Evaluations

Arab American Bar Association: Recommended

Asian American Bar Association: Recommended

Black Men Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Black Women Lawyers' Association: Recommended

Cook County Bar Association: Recommended

Decalogue Society of Lawyers: Recommended

Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois: Qualified

Chicago's LGBTQ+ Bar Association (LAGBAC): Highly Recommended

Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Women's Bar Association of Illinois: Recommended

Tuesday, September 17, 2024

And then there were 10....

Every single election cycle voters are amazed to find that they don't have any choices in most Cook County judicial races.

These voters didn't vote in the primary... on St. Joseph's Day... before the first day of Spring... before the emergence of the 17-year cicadas even. They think that, because the election is in November, that's when they get to make their choices. Some don't want to let their neighbors have any chance of finding out what party they favor. Some are resolutely independent and wouldn't ever vote in a primary.

But, at this stage of the election cycle, most of the decisions about who will be elected to the Cook County judiciary have already been made. I told FWIW readers that there were no judicial election contests set up in Cook County for November except for one in the new 18th Subcircuit and three others in the redrawn 12th.

Turns out, I was wrong.

There are the four subcircuit contests I knew about -- that's eight candidates -- and one countywide Circuit Court contest. That would make 10.

Here's the complete list of Cook County judicial candidates who face election contests in November (the links will take you to each candidate's website):
Pablo deCastro, the Democratic Party's candidate for the countywide Flannery vacancy, now has a Republican opponent.

Tien H. Glaub works for the City of Chicago's Department of Administrative Hearings as a hearing officer and, according to her new campaign website (linked above), "helps manage the administrative adjudication at the City of Chicago’s hearings facilities." She has been licensed to practice law in Illinois since 2008, according to ARDC.

Glaub was not a candidate in the Republican primary this past March.

Pablo deCastro was one of the 12 primary winners who were put on the bench by the Illinois Supreme Court this past Spring. At the time, I reported that deCastro, like each of the others, was unopposed in November -- and the Supreme Court appears to have believed that, too.

I am working to find out more as to how Glaub qualified for the ballot; I hope to be able to report further on this soon.

If you look at the Sidebar (on the desktop version of this site) you will note that the 10 names above are now the only listed Cook County judicial candidates. The former, longer candidate list has been archived on Page Two.

Besides Glaub, several other candidates in the new list were not on the primary candidate list. We'll look at these new websites in future posts.

Septmeber 25 fundraiser for John Hock

Supporters of John Hock's 18th Subcircuit judicial campaign are planning a fundraiser for their candidate on Wednesday, September 25, from 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., at the offices of Romanucci & Blandin, 321 N. Clark Street.

Tickets for the event are $250 each. Sponsorships are available (Supporter - $500, Patron - $1,000, Sponsor - $2,500, Benefactor - $5,000). RSVPs are required. To register, email eromanucci@rblaw.net. Tickets can be paid for by check (to John Hock for Judge) or through this Democracy Engine link.