In a series of orders entered yesterday, the Illinois Supreme Court recalled eight judges to service in Cook County, most of them starting December 15 and all of them ending on December 7, 2026, when the new class of elected judges will take office.
Two of the judges recalled and assigned to service in Cook County never served as a judge here. Judges Carla Alessio Policandriotes, formerly sat in the 12th Judicial Circuit (Will County), and Joseph Mac Leberman, served in the far Downstate 1st Circuit. (Since this article first appeared, the Supreme Court has entered a Corrected Order -- now linked -- indicating Judge Policandriotes will return to the bench on December 22.)
One of the orders entered yesterday was vacated today, due to "clerical error."
The other judges recalled yesterday (who are still being recalled as of today) are:
If I'm not mistaken, this is the first time in over a decade that any judges have been recalled to service in Cook County.
- Jeanne R. Cleveland,
- Sebastian T. Patti,
- Donald J. Suriano,
- Diane M. Shelley (corrected order), and
- James R. Brown
Section 12(c) of Article VI of the 1970 Illinois Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to appoint judges to vacancies, but, in addition, Section 15(a) of Article VI gives the Court the authority to recall and assign "[a]ny retired Judge or Associate Judge, with his or her consent... to judicial service for which he or she shall receive the applicable compensation in lieu of retirement benefits."
This language explains why each of the recall orders linked here begins with an acknowledgement that the judge has consented to the recall: Judges, once retired, can't be drafted into additional service against their wills.
It is not just the retired judge who must consent to the return engagement: While it may not be spelled out in the Illinois Constituton, the Court would not ordinarily return a judge to service against the wishes of the chief judge in the circuit to which the retired judge would be assigned. (Weasel words are used here because I can't assert as an absolute fact that the Court has never placed a particular retired judge back in harness despite the objections of a chief judge. Usually, however, the Court only returns judges to service where the chief judge in a circuit persuades the Court of a need for additional help -- if it were otherwise, a recalled judge might show up for work and find that he or she has nothing to do. If the chief judge is seeking help, it would stand to reason that the chief might also have some input into who might provide that help.)
While anyone browsing the archives of Supreme Court orders will find recall orders entered from time to time outside Cook County, the last time that I know of anyone being recalled here was in 2013 (I know I can rely on FWIW readers to correct me if I am in error here) (also, if anyone goes back to the linked 2013 article, the links therein are broken -- but that is not my fault -- the Court has changed websites in the intervening years).

5 comments:
Cook County does not have a judge shortage. What it has is a "circuit judges not coming to work and doing their jobs" problem. You can fire a cannon down the hallway on most floors of 26th, the Triple Nickel and the Daley Center after 1:30 and not hit a single "public servant" wearing a robe. The operative word being CIRCUIT judge. They get elected and think they don't have to work for their pay. But Chief Judge Charlie Beach won't make them work - just like Tim Evans, he needs their votes in 3 years if he wants to remain king of the hill.
Can you explain the point of recalling former judges versus appointing new judges?
Golly, Anon, Beach has been on the job for two weeks today and you've already written him off as a bum? I know we live in an impatient, instant-on world, but this is ridiculous. The guy probably hasn't had a chance yet to use all his new keys. How long should the grace period be for a new Chief Judge? If two weeks is too long... two days? Two hours? Wow.
555 is busy all day long. This is a nonsense post by an uneducated commenter. In fact 555 judges have late duty assignments (all OP petitions filed by 4: 30 are heard the same day.) Typically the late duty judge is in session on average till 7pm. Then there is the 555 “overnight” duties which is 9pm to 3am.
Anonymous commenter should get out of his mom’s basement and into the sunlight.
It is a weird quirk in the system. A new judge can only be appointed to a vacant spot that had been previously created by the legislature. But the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the separate authority to recall a retired judge even if there are no current vacancies.
Post a Comment