Friday, August 12, 2011

ABA solicits nominations for best legal blogs

The American Bar Association is soliciting nominations for its annual list of the 100 best legal blogs (a/k/a "blawgs").

In an email, Sarah Randag, the Web Editor of the ABA Journal asks persons to use the linked Blawg 100 Amici form to nominate a blog "that you read regularly [and] that you think other lawyers should know about." Persons are encouraged to nominate more than one blog. But -- as you might expect from a national lawyers' organization -- they have thought through a number of possible angles:
[P]lease know that we disregard amici from:
  • Blawggers who nominate their own blawgs or blawgs to which they have previously contributed posts.
  • Wives and husbands who nominate their spouses’ blawgs.
  • Employees of law firms who nominate blawgs with their own firm’s branding.
  • Public relations professionals in the employ of lawyers or law firms who nominate their clients’ blawgs.
  • Pairs of blawggers who have clearly entered into a gentlemen’s agreement to nominate each other.
The Amici form asks for comments about the nominated blogs. There is a 500-character limit -- but this shouldn't pose a problem for dedicated Twitterers. Or is that tweeters? Twits?

The ABA asks nominators to keep these criteria in mind:
  • We’re only interested in blawgs in which the author is recognizable as a lawyer or law student in the vast majority of his or her posts.
  • The blawg should be written with an audience of lawyers or law students—rather than potential clients or potential law students—in mind.
  • The majority of the blawg’s content should be unique to the blawg and not cross-posted or cut and pasted from other publications.
  • We are not interested in blawgs that more or less exist to promote the author’s products and services.
Blog, er, blawg nominations are due by September 9.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Anonymous comments are once again permitted on this blog but, for crying out loud, please be civil. Comment moderation remains in effect. The management reserves its right to refuse to publish comments.