Chicago Police announced Thursday evening that a second arrest has been made in the murder of Associate Judge Raymond Myles. Here is the link to the WGN-TV News coverage of the story.
In an article posted to the DNAInfo.com website, Kelly Bauer and Erica Demarest quote Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson as saying that the suspect, 45-year old Earl Wilson, was "no stranger to the criminal justice system."
Bauer and Demarest noted that, according to Supt. Johnson, "Wilson was convicted in 1992 of attempted murder and sentenced to 18 years in prison. He was released in 2004 and later arrested multiple times for domestic battery, illegal gun possession and possession of stolen vehicles."
The use of the word "arrested" seems significant. Were there further convictions arising from these 'multiple arrests'? What sentences were imposed? What portion of these sentences were served? When was Wilson's most recent arrest? When was the last case involving Wilson resolved? At the time of the murder, was Wilson on probation? Parole? It would be interesting to know the answers to these questions, I think.
Friday, April 28, 2017
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Judge Cooke resigns
Judge Richard C. Cooke has resigned from the 6th Subcircuit seat to which he was elected just last November.
This morning, the Tribune reported that Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans and the Executive Committee of the Circuit Court Executive Committee had decided to refer Judge Cooke to the Judicial Inquiry Board on account of his 0alleged failure to serve as assigned. The Chief Judge's office summarized the allegations against Judge Cooke in an email to FWIW earlier today:
But not today.
This morning, the Tribune reported that Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans and the Executive Committee of the Circuit Court Executive Committee had decided to refer Judge Cooke to the Judicial Inquiry Board on account of his 0alleged failure to serve as assigned. The Chief Judge's office summarized the allegations against Judge Cooke in an email to FWIW earlier today:
Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans entered an order assigning Circuit Judge Richard C. Cooke to the First Municipal District. The order was entered on November 22, 2016, with an effective date of December 5, 2016.FWIW reached out to Judge Cooke for comment but, for the record, Cooke would only confirm that he has resigned and that he may have additional comments to make about this matter at a later date.
Upon receipt of that assignment, Judge E. Kenneth Wright Jr., presiding judge of the First Municipal District, assigned Judge Cooke to the Traffic Section on December 6, 2016.
After the initial observation and training period, Judge Cooke did not report to his assignment to the Traffic Section and has been presiding over marriage ceremonies since January 20, 2017.
Chief Judge Evans referred Judge Cooke’s noncompliance with his judicial assignment to the Executive Committee of the Circuit Court of Cook County.
On Tuesday, the Executive Committee referred the noncompliance with his judicial assignment to the Judicial Inquiry Board.
But not today.
Judge Jessica A. O'Brien reassigned to administrative duties pending further notice
Pursuant to action taken last evening by the Executive Committee of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Judge Jessica A. O'Brien, recently indicted by a federal grand jury in connection with an alleged mortgage fraud scheme, has "been reassigned to administrative duties in the office of the Presiding Judge of the First Municipal District, Judge E. Kenneth Wright, Jr." until further notice.
The announcement was made today in a press release issued by the Office of Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans.
The court's action yesterday confirms the temporary assignment of Judge O'Brien to administrative duties after the April 12 indictment was announced.
The court's statement today provides, in pertinent part:
The announcement was made today in a press release issued by the Office of Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans.
The court's action yesterday confirms the temporary assignment of Judge O'Brien to administrative duties after the April 12 indictment was announced.
The court's statement today provides, in pertinent part:
A judge may be temporarily reassigned to restricted or other than judicial duties whenever there are charges or implications of improper conduct, depending on the severity and nature, under “Illinois Supreme Court Rule 56. Temporary Assignment to Other Duties.” In the Circuit Court of Cook County, administrative duties can include conducting marriage ceremonies and reviewing petitions for reduced court-filing fees for indigent parties.
Regarding any questions directed to the Office of the Chief Judge about any case in any court system, Illinois Supreme Court Rule 63 states: “A judge should abstain from public comment about a pending or impending proceeding in any court, and should require similar abstention on the part of court personnel subject to the judge’s direction and control.”
A non-judicial fundraiser in which judicial wannabes may be interested
Tickets for the event are $250 apiece, but sponsorships are available ($500 - $1,500 - $5,600). Checks should be made payable to the Committee to Elect Joseph Berrios Assessor. To reserve tickets, or for more information, email Chris@CraticShaffer.com or call (773) 355-9927.
No, I am not suggesting that persons buying tickets for this shindig would have a leg up on slating or anything crass like that.
But I pass this information along because many judicial candidates, or potential judicial candidates, don't often know about events like this one. You'd think that anyone setting up a political committee would be inundated with solicitations from every politician breathing. But, strangely enough, at least from what I've seen, not only do political pros not want 'nobody nobody sent', they don't want the nobodies' money either. So, unless the judicial wannabes were politically wired to begin with, they never find out when the pros commune.
Many non-wired judicial aspirants have tried difficult cases, settled thorny disputes, volunteered in their communities, wowed the many bar associations -- but when they show up for slating, the political pros regard these accomplished men and women like skunks at a garden party: who invited them? Events like this one at least give the wannabes an opportunity to encounter the political pros on their own turf, to cultivate potential relationships that may---in time---if there are enough vacancies to go around---if all of a politico's proteges have been accommodated---result in some level of support for the wannabe's ambitions.
If that sounds rather cynical, I suppose it is. Let me rephrase: The most personable would-be candidate can not charm anyone he or she can't meet. Events like this one may provide an opportunity for would-be candidates to meet, and maybe even impress, the powers-that-slate.
Tuesday, April 25, 2017
Campaign website established for Judge Joanne Rosado
The Illinois Supreme Court appointed Judge Rosado to the Kennedy vacancy in the 11th Subcircuit earlier this year. According to her campaign bio, before her appointment, Rosado tried "over 40 felony jury trials, including several first degree murder cases, and over 100 felony bench trials" as a Cook County Assistant Public Defender. She joined that office in 2002.
According to her campaign bio, Rosado has served with the Chicago Coalition for Law-Related Education, coaching a Mock Trial team in the Chicago Public Schools. One Bogan High School team that Rosado coached placed among the top four finalists (out of thirty teams). She has also served as a Board Member of the Puerto Rican Bar Association. A graduate of John Marshall Law School, Rosado also attended DePaul University and Resurrection High School.
Campaign website, May 11 fundraiser announced for Judge Cecilia Anne Horan
The Thursday, May 11 fundraiser for Judge Horan will be held at the Old Crow Smokehouse, 149 W. Kinzie. Colette Kopon, Moses Suarez, Giulia Volini, and Cook County Commissioner Larry Suffredin are listed as the sponsors for the event, which will run from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m.
Tickets are $150 each, but sponsorships are available ($250 - Supporter, $500 - Patron, $1,000 - Sponsor, $1,500 - Host, and $2,500 - Chair). For more information about the event, or to reserve tickets, call (773) 562-9559 or email eric@blueprintcampaignconsulting.com.
The Illinois Supreme Court recently appointed Judge Horan to the countywide Hartigan vacancy. Prior to her appointment, Horan was a partner at Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP. Horan is the President of the Lesbian and Gay Bar Association of Chicago and, according to the biography on her campaign website, serves on the board of directors of her neighborhood organization, West Edgewater Area Residents (WEAR). A lifelong Chicago resident, Horan is a graduate of Taft High School and Columbia College. She was licensed to practice law in Illinois in 1997.
Some photos from last week's fundraiser for Judge Shoffner
A reader was kind enough to send in these pictures from last Thursday's fundraiser for Judge Robin D. Shoffner. The candidate is shown in the left photo with the two sponsors of her event, 3rd Ward Ald. Pat Dowell and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle.
As a practical matter, I don't get out to many (most!) events plugged here on FWIW, but -- for future reference -- if you have photos of an event that you'd like to share, email me at jackleyhane@yahoo.com and I will run them if and when I can. (That means no promises and no commitments, but I'll do what I can when time and space and the day job permits.) Be sure and provide as much information as you can about who is in the photos, where they were taken, and so forth.
Thursday, April 13, 2017
An arrest made in the murder of Judge Myles
Per Erica Demarest and Tanveer Ali on DNAInfo.com, Joshua Smith has been arrested for the murder of Associate Judge Raymond Myles. A bond hearing for Smith will be held today. Smith previously served time for armed robbery, according to the DNAInfo post.
Also according to the DNAInfo post, at least one other suspect is being sought. According to police officials quoted by Demarest and Ali, Judge Myles was targeted for robbery -- but apparently not because of his occupation.
Related: WGN-TV coverage of Smith arrest.
Also according to the DNAInfo post, at least one other suspect is being sought. According to police officials quoted by Demarest and Ali, Judge Myles was targeted for robbery -- but apparently not because of his occupation.
Related: WGN-TV coverage of Smith arrest.
Some days it's hard to be Dr. Pangloss
Presented without further comment:
- Federal Grand Jury Indicts Illinois Attorney in Mortgage Fraud Scheme (DOJ press release);
- Judge indicted for alleged fraudulent mortgage scheme (Chicago Daily Law Bulletin);
- Cook County judge Jessica O’Brien indicted on federal financial fraud charges (Injustice Watch);
- Cook County Judge Jessica Arong O’Brien faces fraud charges (Chicago Sun-Times).
Monday, April 10, 2017
Judge murdered this morning outside his South Side home
Cook County Associate Judge Raymond Myles was shot multiple times early this morning outside his home in the West Chesterfield portion of Chicago's Roseland Community. He was pronounced dead at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn soon thereafter; a lady accompanying the judge was wounded in the attack and is expected to survive. The Chicago Tribune Breaking News coverage can be accessed at this link.
DNAInfo,in a story reported by Kelly Bauer and Erica Demarest, indicates that the incident might have started out as an attempted robbery.
Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans issued the following statement concerning the passing of Judge Myles:
DNAInfo,in a story reported by Kelly Bauer and Erica Demarest, indicates that the incident might have started out as an attempted robbery.
Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans issued the following statement concerning the passing of Judge Myles:
I join all of the judges today in the Circuit Court of Cook County in expressing our sadness regarding the tragic passing of our colleague and friend, Associate Judge Raymond Myles. I offer my deepest condolences to his family, friends and colleagues in the Criminal Division.
Judge Myles joined the court in October 1999 when the Illinois Supreme Court appointed him to fill a vacancy that he held for just over a year. The circuit judges appointed him as an associate judge in June 2001, and he has served in the Criminal Division since March 2009.
Judge Myles joined the bench with a wealth of experience in law and extensive service to the community. I have always known Judge Myles to be focused and determined in the pursuit of justice, and his conduct earned him the confidence and respect of the people who appeared before him.
All of our colleagues at the Leighton Criminal Court Building will miss Judge Myles, who they came to know for his kindness and his impartial administration of justice.
Wednesday, April 05, 2017
CCBA sponsors May 2 judicial reception
There will be an open bar and complimentary hors d'oeuvres will be served.
Tickets are $65 each for CCBA members, $100 for others (except that students, with ID, will be admitted for $25). All sitting judges will be admitted gratis.
Tickets can be purchased on the Cook County Bar Association website.
April 20 fundraiser for Judge Robin D. Shoffner
Tickets for the event are $150 each, and sponsorships are available (for $250, $500, or $1,000). For more information about the event, or to order tickets, email info@craticshaffer.com.
Judge Shoffner currently sits by Supreme Court appointment to the Fabri vacancy in the 8th Subcircuit.
Monday, April 03, 2017
FAQs about FWIW
This is a post I reprint (and revise) every now and again. It seems so early, but the 2018 cycle is clearly underway. If this cycle is like every other recent one, there are some new readers joining us these days, including prospective judicial candidates and their supporters. These new readers may have questions about this blog. (A lot of this stuff is already addressed in the blog Sidebar, but it may not hurt to spell it out here, too.) Also, this seems like a good opportunity to restate some of the groundrules for regular visitors.
This is a non-partisan blog. FWIW readers are often passionately partisan, and the current political situation seems likely to inspire more outspoken engagement than ever, at least in recent memory. However, I want to cover all candidates running for judge in Cook County. Because Democratic candidates have historically enjoyed such tremendous success in this county, to the point where Republicans do not bother to contest many races, most of the posts here will be about candidates in the Democratic primary. But I will gladly cover---and have covered---Republican candidates, too. If a candidate has a website, and I can find it, or someone sends me the link, I will link to it and, when we have enough accumulated, post another link in the blog Sidebar.
This blog does not make endorsements. Over the years I've been doing this, I always seem to know at least some of the candidates, whether I've had cases with or against them, or because we've met through bar functions, or because we've met through this blog. I will mention significant connections, but I don't think the public cares how many candidates I've met, and I am certain the public does not care who I intend to vote for. On the other hand, while I won't make individual endorsements, I have been a lawyer for 37 years and I have fairly well-developed opinions about what I want for my clients when I appear in court. I reserve the right to talk about that -- in general terms -- in future posts.
Just because I know a candidate, or some of their supporters, does not mean I will provide more or better exposure for them here. Certainly not on purpose. Readers will undoubtedly see more 'stuff' about some candidates than others, but that is only because some candidates make more of an effort to ask me to publicize events. I have a day job. So I don't see everything that every candidate puts up on their own websites or Facebook pages. Also, some of the stuff I do get (and because I've been doing this awhile I'm on a lot of email blast lists) are for events that the candidate may or may not want to publicize. A good (and frequent) example is a fundraiser in a private home. I won't put anyone's home address out in the Internet for all to see unless I'm asked to. The best way for candidates to get me to publicize their events is to email me an invite at jackleyhane@yahoo.com -- with a request for me to run a post about the event.
Every election cycle, some candidates will complain that I haven't 'reported' their bar ratings -- and I don't, generally, unless there's something I think newsworthy about them. However, I will report everyone's bar ratings all at once -- when the bar groups (the CBA and the Alliance) release their ratings to the public.
I've made an editorial decision to try and present all candidates in the most positive light that I can, especially in my first post about a campaign. But not all candidates are created equal: Some are older, some are younger, some have tons of relevant experience, other have very limited experience. Some may even have run afoul of the disciplinary authorities. When the bar association evaluations come out, later in the election cycle, some candidates will have entirely favorable ratings, but others will not. Bar associations can and do differ over the merits of particular candidates. All of this is fair game for FWIW. But I'm not going to go out of my way to slam anyone.
In past election cycles I have given candidates the opportunity to make their own case (click here to bring up posts written by judicial candidates in prior campaigns). I plan to do this again; expect an announcement around the first of the year.
I believe the best candidates will distinguish themselves when as much information as possible about every candidate is presented for the voters' consideration. In addition to bar evaluations, I will advise of newspaper endorsements (if they're made) or community group or union endorsements (when I can verify them). I'll re-post video interviews when I can. All of this stuff will be collected in Organizing the Data posts (explained more, below) as the primary date comes closer.
Judicial candidates and committees do not pay for posts appearing on this blog. Every year, someone asks. Later on, you may see candidate ads in the spaces I set aside for Google ads on this page, but I do not book those ads. I personally do not accept candidate ads. I will accept ads from persons or companies looking to offer products or services to judicial candidates; see the blog Sidebar for additional information.
In this very early stage of the election cycle, judicial election posts on FWIW are read primarily by candidates, their supporters, and persons who are thinking about running for judge in the future. A lot of judges tell me that they visit here regularly; so do persons affiliated with the various bar association judicial evaluation committees. As the primary date draws close, this site will be increasingly visited by voters looking for information. The information that candidates and their supporters have provided, post by post, will be collected and 'packaged' for the voters. Candidates may want to look at past Organizing the Data posts to get a feel for the kind of information has been collected and posted. I'm always looking to enhance the functionality of this site and I reserve the right to make any improvements within my abilities.)
FWIW covers Cook County judicial elections because the newspapers and other media outlets provide so little coverage. Having run for judge twice myself (in 1994 and 1996) I appreciate just how little opportunity judicial candidates have to get their credentials before the public. I've already stated my editorial bias in favor of trying to present candidates in the best possible light, at least in my initial post about any given campaign. However, I reserve the right to fact-check information provided, to add information I've discovered on my own, to combine or even ignore duplicative releases. In short, I reserve the right to edit and to report within the limits of my abilities and resources.
Comments on this blog are 'moderated.' This means I read any comment that anyone cares to leave and decide whether or not it will get posted. A lot of readers tell me that they enjoy the comments here -- but they don't see all the droppings left by the trolls in my inbox. Frankly, it's depressing -- and I think it's getting worse over time. I suppose the proliferation of trolls is yet another symptom of our current hyperpartisan political climate.
I believe in the First Amendment. But this is my blog, not Bughouse Square, and if you think I'm clinging irrationally to Victorian sensibilities, that's just too bad. I reserve my right to 'flush' any comment, including the toxic gunk left by the trolls.
Commenters: Be civil. If you must be partisan or mean, be clever. Or funny. Or creative. Or else go away. I'd really appreciate it you would leave a name, but I've come to realize I'm probably the only person dumb enough to put my name out here. Maybe (as some commenters have done) you could pick, and use, a nom de plume.
This is a non-partisan blog. FWIW readers are often passionately partisan, and the current political situation seems likely to inspire more outspoken engagement than ever, at least in recent memory. However, I want to cover all candidates running for judge in Cook County. Because Democratic candidates have historically enjoyed such tremendous success in this county, to the point where Republicans do not bother to contest many races, most of the posts here will be about candidates in the Democratic primary. But I will gladly cover---and have covered---Republican candidates, too. If a candidate has a website, and I can find it, or someone sends me the link, I will link to it and, when we have enough accumulated, post another link in the blog Sidebar.
This blog does not make endorsements. Over the years I've been doing this, I always seem to know at least some of the candidates, whether I've had cases with or against them, or because we've met through bar functions, or because we've met through this blog. I will mention significant connections, but I don't think the public cares how many candidates I've met, and I am certain the public does not care who I intend to vote for. On the other hand, while I won't make individual endorsements, I have been a lawyer for 37 years and I have fairly well-developed opinions about what I want for my clients when I appear in court. I reserve the right to talk about that -- in general terms -- in future posts.
Just because I know a candidate, or some of their supporters, does not mean I will provide more or better exposure for them here. Certainly not on purpose. Readers will undoubtedly see more 'stuff' about some candidates than others, but that is only because some candidates make more of an effort to ask me to publicize events. I have a day job. So I don't see everything that every candidate puts up on their own websites or Facebook pages. Also, some of the stuff I do get (and because I've been doing this awhile I'm on a lot of email blast lists) are for events that the candidate may or may not want to publicize. A good (and frequent) example is a fundraiser in a private home. I won't put anyone's home address out in the Internet for all to see unless I'm asked to. The best way for candidates to get me to publicize their events is to email me an invite at jackleyhane@yahoo.com -- with a request for me to run a post about the event.
Every election cycle, some candidates will complain that I haven't 'reported' their bar ratings -- and I don't, generally, unless there's something I think newsworthy about them. However, I will report everyone's bar ratings all at once -- when the bar groups (the CBA and the Alliance) release their ratings to the public.
I've made an editorial decision to try and present all candidates in the most positive light that I can, especially in my first post about a campaign. But not all candidates are created equal: Some are older, some are younger, some have tons of relevant experience, other have very limited experience. Some may even have run afoul of the disciplinary authorities. When the bar association evaluations come out, later in the election cycle, some candidates will have entirely favorable ratings, but others will not. Bar associations can and do differ over the merits of particular candidates. All of this is fair game for FWIW. But I'm not going to go out of my way to slam anyone.
In past election cycles I have given candidates the opportunity to make their own case (click here to bring up posts written by judicial candidates in prior campaigns). I plan to do this again; expect an announcement around the first of the year.
I believe the best candidates will distinguish themselves when as much information as possible about every candidate is presented for the voters' consideration. In addition to bar evaluations, I will advise of newspaper endorsements (if they're made) or community group or union endorsements (when I can verify them). I'll re-post video interviews when I can. All of this stuff will be collected in Organizing the Data posts (explained more, below) as the primary date comes closer.
Judicial candidates and committees do not pay for posts appearing on this blog. Every year, someone asks. Later on, you may see candidate ads in the spaces I set aside for Google ads on this page, but I do not book those ads. I personally do not accept candidate ads. I will accept ads from persons or companies looking to offer products or services to judicial candidates; see the blog Sidebar for additional information.
In this very early stage of the election cycle, judicial election posts on FWIW are read primarily by candidates, their supporters, and persons who are thinking about running for judge in the future. A lot of judges tell me that they visit here regularly; so do persons affiliated with the various bar association judicial evaluation committees. As the primary date draws close, this site will be increasingly visited by voters looking for information. The information that candidates and their supporters have provided, post by post, will be collected and 'packaged' for the voters. Candidates may want to look at past Organizing the Data posts to get a feel for the kind of information has been collected and posted. I'm always looking to enhance the functionality of this site and I reserve the right to make any improvements within my abilities.)
FWIW covers Cook County judicial elections because the newspapers and other media outlets provide so little coverage. Having run for judge twice myself (in 1994 and 1996) I appreciate just how little opportunity judicial candidates have to get their credentials before the public. I've already stated my editorial bias in favor of trying to present candidates in the best possible light, at least in my initial post about any given campaign. However, I reserve the right to fact-check information provided, to add information I've discovered on my own, to combine or even ignore duplicative releases. In short, I reserve the right to edit and to report within the limits of my abilities and resources.
Comments on this blog are 'moderated.' This means I read any comment that anyone cares to leave and decide whether or not it will get posted. A lot of readers tell me that they enjoy the comments here -- but they don't see all the droppings left by the trolls in my inbox. Frankly, it's depressing -- and I think it's getting worse over time. I suppose the proliferation of trolls is yet another symptom of our current hyperpartisan political climate.
I believe in the First Amendment. But this is my blog, not Bughouse Square, and if you think I'm clinging irrationally to Victorian sensibilities, that's just too bad. I reserve my right to 'flush' any comment, including the toxic gunk left by the trolls.
Commenters: Be civil. If you must be partisan or mean, be clever. Or funny. Or creative. Or else go away. I'd really appreciate it you would leave a name, but I've come to realize I'm probably the only person dumb enough to put my name out here. Maybe (as some commenters have done) you could pick, and use, a nom de plume.